reply to post by Andre Neves
If it was a device that enabled the invisibility, I'd first test it thoroughly for faults under a variety of conditions. Heat, cold, dust, sand,
rain, snow, etc. Then, I'd find a way to also conceal a camera/camcorder along with my own personal invisibility.
Then, I come here to ATS and poll users as to all the most sought after (secret, restricted, off-limits, classified, etc.) places they'd like to see.
If I was successful in concealing the camera along with myself, I'd bring back footage of all the top places that were chosen. Many would scream fake
as expected. So...
I'd find a way build (or we would all collectively design and build) some kind of 'sealed' or tamper-resistant camera so that none of the footage
inside could be altered to help prove the footage captured was indeed real. I've always wished that there was some sort of standard that could be
adhered to for UFO footage from cameras modified to be tamper-resisitant for just that purpose to help validate UFO footage.
Of course, I'd need to 'make some withdrawals' from certain places to help fund our 'research'. But, I would enjoy exposing the most secretive
places people know of and share the footage. And, perhaps discover other places and things along the way that virtually no one knows about and share
footage of those places too.
That's the fantasy I suppose.
However, if this kind of invisibility really were a reality, maybe most (like me) would also consider keeping a lower profile.
As previously stated; Invisibility by no means guarantees invincibility.