FEMA sources confirm coming martial law, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 24 times


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 08:45 AM by whiteraven
reply to post by Maxmars



Maxmars this quote

"More scoundrels have gotten protection from habeus corpus than innocent men" I believe is what Lincoln said when questioned by the press.


and the idea of going beyond the constitution sheds some light on Obama wanting to read more about Lincoln.

I wonder what is planned as Biden had said that "at first it will appear that we are in the wrong" and if that has to do with extending the US Federal goverment reach over the constitution?

I hope not as I would hate to see this type of Waco action again as most would.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 08:49 AM by Maxmars
reply to post by whiteraven



I hadn't thought of that. That is a troubling notion. Time will tell..., interesting times we live in, no?


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 09:15 AM by seek4 truth
I do not see why people can not get what is going on here? It is like the matrix only almost nobody excepts the truth. America has never been America as some of you fairy tale believing school children have been led to believe. It is at the very least a corporation and we are the products. Wake up fools! Nobody did anything before, nobody is going to do anything about it now. Hell most of you still have not figured out the least little bit of hidden truth. Most of you have no clue as to what is going on so you talk bad about them in one way then help them in another.

The constitution does not mean #, it is never enforced beyond what they need us to do, you can not use it in a court of law to defend yourself against the government, if you think you can, try it. Most of you people do not know half as much as you think you do!

If you ever pay attention you will notice people like Bush breaking the rules of this worthless document all of the time. Why? he works for the company owners!!! He was not elected by the people and if you think so you should just go bury your head in the sand because you can do nobody any good.

Bahhhh Bahhh misfit sheep!!! Deny ignorance, seek out the roots. Washington DC is the military branch of a trinity that rules the world. The people of America always have and always will do whatever they tell or trick them into doing. Why because as they say, we are just stupid Americans....You could not even imagine how deep this all goes, read the book "old world secrets the omega project codes".



[edit on 4-12-2008 by seek4 truth]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 09:17 AM by Mdv2
U.S. Defense Department plans to deploy as many 20,000 U.S. troops within the U.S. for homeland security and anti-terrorism efforts could result in a significant number being placed or having some kind of presence in Arizona and the Southwest, according to security experts.

There have been threats against the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station west of Phoenix, the Hoover Dam on the Arizona-Nevada border as well as the Las Vegas Strip and Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Arizona is also home to U.S. military intelligence operations at Fort Huachuca and has become a focal point with border security efforts along the Mexican border.

The Washington Post recently reported the Pentagon plans to have up 20,000 U.S. troops placed in domestic locations with the charge of responding to security matters.

Some of those troops -- which are under the U.S. Northern Command -- have already been active in Arizona, helping with security efforts along the Mexican border.

The Colorado Springs, Colo.-based Northern Command was created after 9/11 and is geared towards homeland security and civil defense within the U.S.

Civil libertarians on the left and right wonder what role the U.S. troops deployed on U.S. soil will play in security efforts and point to long-held precedents against having the military be involved in law enforcement matters.

The Northern Command has also been deployed to help with natural disasters such as hurricanes and has partnered with state national guard units, including Arizona’s, on various programs, according to Defense Department information.

“The military’s deployment within U.S. borders raises critical questions that must be answered,” said Jonathan Hafetz, staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project. “What is the unit’s mission? What functions will it perform? And why was it necessary to deploy the unit rather than rely on civilian agencies and personnel and the National Guard?” asked Hafetz in a statement.

A number of security experts and others declined comment but others expect a fair number of domestically deployed troops to have a presence in the Southwest because of the Mexican border and some high-profile targets.


www.bizjournals.com...

Sounds kinda weird to me.. deploying so many soldiers to counter what? The war on terrorism has been going on for a while now and suddenly there is a need to deploy such huge numbers of troops at home? Sounds fishy to me....


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 09:55 AM by jimmyx
reply to post by seek4 truth



why do you think that none of us has a clue, but you do. maybe the ones that do not post have already tried to make changes, but were involved in some pretty nasty retaliation, and have decided it's not worth risking their own families fate. there are people on this website that are working from the inside and have to be very careful of their own situations. when one tries to initiate changes, he must first look at all the possible ramifications of the actions taken. when powerful people are confronted, you have to be subtle, discreet, and have the ability to show how a "change" will benefit him or her. this all has to be thought out and prepared pre-contact. the risk/reward has to be evaluated for each individual. example...the risk of simply "losing face" or "not taken seriously" is much too high for some. being shunned from some circle of friends or business aquaintences is too much for others. even those that are well-off and their assets cannot be touched, may have been already "shown the other risks" to which they therefore impose their own inactivity or lack of involvement.
when it becomes serious, and not just some chatter on a website, courage is a lonely, fearful, and focused path.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:22 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Tinkabit



well we all know the past and current leaders of this country have displayed grossly poor judgment with regards to the country. This will be another gross blunder and a discusting display of poor judgment. If anybody thinks we can be strongarmed, without argument then your incorrect. Im sure there are thousands that think like me out there and organizing should be fairly simple. So lets not make the mistake of tryinig to contain Mr American. He dont like to be caged, has never been caged, and will not be caged by nothing, or no one.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:31 AM by vonholland
reply to post by Tinkabit



I suggest everyone go and learn Krav Maga at their local martial arts places. That, along with guns, can help.

anyone in philly area send me a u2u


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 12:11 PM by nenothtu
I've got some random, off the cuff thoughts here.

reply to Agit8dChop:

"And not one American can complain, because we assisted in the slaughter of many russian troops in Afghanistan.
And our adventure is by NO WAY any more justified than the russians."

I beg to differ. The Soviets were in Afghanistan to "defend world Socialism" (prop up a puppet regime ), not because of any threat to Mother Russia. The Russian Embassy staff killed in Kabul as a pretext for invasion were killed by Afghans who took excepetion to "world Socialism" invading THEIR back yard. Iran, by contrast, threatens anyone who cares to be threatened. They are a threat to all, and especially stability amongst their neighbors, unless said stability is dictated by the mullahs in Iran. I support the Russian invasion of Georgia, by the way. Folks in Abkhazia have the same rights to self-determination as anyone else.

reply to Reddupo:

"This right doesn't matter to sheep full of fear. You won't get a preemptive takedown of any NWO by the people, and if suddenly everyone grew courageous and a physical revolution began...well let's just say the difference in weapons technology is a wee bit larger than it was when we colonists fought the British."

That "technical superiority" is of course the reason that Al-Qaida has been eradicated from the face of the earth once and for all, right? I'm not buying the "technical superiority" argument. Technology can be turned into a liability much pronto. Folks tend to rely on it way too much, and when it breaks, all they can do is sit down and cry.

reply to switching yard:

" Unfortunately, I think that if there is a "national emergency" and they declare martial law, your ISP won't work and the broadcast "news" you get will be spin.

When you find that you cannot connect to the Internet and they are saying on the radio and TV that we're under martial law and stay tuned for a message from the president, well, when that happens... just realize that "the news" is what the power elite want you to believe, not necessarily the truth.
The Internet would be shut down completely. Guaranteed. They will probably say foreign hackers shut it down."

Anyone who lets the TV news or the internet think for them has lost their freedom already. See the above reply about "technological superiority". These are great tools, but nothing more. You should be prepared to do without them. When the news reports about "terrorists" that are NOT screaming "allahu akbar!", and who seem to be targeting TPTB, instead of average (defenseless) folks, you might want to rethink the "terrorist" label. Remeber, one man's "terrorist" is another man's "freedom fighter".

reply to ashamedamerican:

"Don't get me wrong, I'm not normally a violent type of guy.
I was raised by old dried up hippes, I'm all for peace and love on earth, but there comes a time when every human has to see their own worth, and refuse to let anyone step on them for any reason."

Just like it says in Ecclesiastes, there is a time for everything. I like you, man. You got nothing to be "ashamed" of.

reply to whiteraven:

"The phrase "that deaf, dumb and blind man sure plays mean pinball" comes to heart."

Yeah, what he said. I gave you a star for that one.

reply to whiteraven:

"and the idea of going beyond the constitution sheds some light on Obama wanting to read more about Lincoln. "

Didn't that character that played John Titor say something about a president that wanted to be the next Lincoln?

reply to jimmyx:

"when it becomes serious, and not just some chatter on a website, courage is a lonely, fearful, and focused path. "

Roger THAT.

reply to boomchank:

In reply to your entire last post, I'll mention one thing, not elaborate, and leave it at that. Solution #1: terrain.

nenothtu out
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 17 hours ago, 123 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 36 replies