It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX
alex, are you trying to say the photo is part of a cover up? get real. They release a hi res version of the face clearly disproving the face = artificial
proponents and now its just "a cover up"
Originally posted by Solo954
reply to post by BIONICLE ALEX
Why weren't those pics released back in the 70's? Just out of curiosity
Originally posted by NavalFC
nonsense, nonsense and MORE nonsense.
First off as far as the fading,its called resolution. and the picture ou posted has had its brighness and contrast adjusted from the original Nice try.
But high resolution allows you to see more detail.
Thats how it works. the best way to demonstrate this is take a kick ass game, say crysis , run it at low res and look at the textures, then high res. get the point?
As to the person asking why the high res one wasnt released in the 70s..
BECAUSE THE HIGH RESOLUTION ONES WERENT TAKEN DURING THE 70S THATS WHY THEY DIDNT EXIST YET
is this really so hard? as instrumentation, satellite photography and such improve the quality of the images is going to change! from faded low res pics to high res detailed pics.
Its no "cover up" its no "filtering"
its called progression of my technology, and the length some of you cover up proponents will go to prop up your ludcrious views is just ridiculous, here in demonstrated again, the high res photo Does not agree with wat you had in mind so its automaticlly a conspiracy. This is ridiculous, the academic community left your kind behind long ago.
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
and your proof?
Originally posted by RFBurns
Hey Naval...every single one of those images are from NASA, or ASU, or JPL.
Not a single one of them are from independant mars research websites!!!
So I guess your confirming alteration eh??
Good, we need the extreme skeptical confirmation to what we already know!!
Thanks man!!! We greatly appriciate it!!!
Cheers!!!!