#1 Mars, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 06:21 PM by NavalFC
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan



first off the image of the crater is eexaggerated and has manipulation done to it. However you know what? a high resolution image of this crater does infact exist!
dayton.hq.nasa.gov...

See, no strangeness

as far as the model moon..you mean to tell me you cant think of a single reason why scientists might want a 3d map of the moon> thats essentially what the model is, 3D. another thing, the line "how can we be sure the moon landings are real"

what nonsense. The 3d model/map wasnt exactly to scale! not big enough for people to stand on! it is high res images pasted onto a ball!

The moon hoax idea has been destroyed time and time and time again, most recently by myth busters.

get real.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 06:41 PM by ArMaP
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to
post by bigfatfurrytexan



first off the image of the crater is eexaggerated and has manipulation done to it. However you know what? a high resolution image of this crater does infact exist!
dayton.hq.nasa.gov...
That is not a higher resolution image, it's an extremely smaller resolution image.

I do not have the ID of that photo, but if someone posts it you will see that you are wrong about the resolution.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 06:56 PM by ArMaP
I have found the original photo, it's photo AS11-41-6156.



The rectangle marks the area of the image posted by bigfatfurrytexan.
Click the image to see it in its full size.

It's an official NASA photo.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:03 PM by NavalFC
reply to post by ArMaP



yes but even zoomed in as is in furry potos the boundaries are not as clearly defined and "bright".

furthermore this higher res photo shows just what it is: a crater , not an artificial structure.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:04 PM by NavalFC
reply to post by angel of lightangelo



alive as in what? alive as in being taken seriously by anyone who matters and being given consideration? No.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:11 PM by angel of lightangelo
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to
post by angel of lightangelo



alive as in what? alive as in being taken seriously by anyone who matters and being given consideration? No.


Isn't it nice that you have a place like this where you can freely express your opinion?


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:32 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to
post by ArMaP



yes but even zoomed in as is in furry potos the boundaries are not as clearly defined and "bright".

furthermore this higher res photo shows just what it is: a crater , not an artificial structure.


Seriously? there is a rectangle there as sure as i am sitting at my computer desk right now.

Really?

Wow...

So, are you just going to deny everything then? Who pays you for this service?




reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:51 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by NavalFC

as far as the model moon..you mean to tell me you cant think of a single reason why scientists might want a 3d map of the moon> thats essentially what the model is, 3D. another thing, the line "how can we be sure the moon landings are real"

what nonsense. The 3d model/map wasnt exactly to scale! not big enough for people to stand on! it is high res images pasted onto a ball!

The moon hoax idea has been destroyed time and time and time again, most recently by myth busters.

get real.


Mythbusters is the least scientific thing i have EVER seen on TV. "Mr. Wizard" would be VERY displeased. They use rough estimations of most of their tests, using specifics only when safety is a concern. So much so that I can't watch it anymore without getting a massive headache.

I don't believe the landing was hoaxed, and clearly stated such. I would question why you even mention it, but that would also question your integrity and that isn't where i want to go....yet.

Now...let me ask you: do you really think I implied that they put little men on that model? I think not.

What I was showing you is the extent that NASA may be willing to go to in their efforts to obfuscate. If i listen to the voice recordings from the astronauts, it seems pretty obvious that THEY saw something up there. And, to be honest, i cannot buy those wierd looking, white blob mountains (that all look nearly identical) that are in the surface images.

I would also point out that making a scale model replica of the moon (as it seems they did, given the images I posted) would make it MUCH easier to hide any surface features that would show some level of civlized footprints on the lunar surface, as it would remove the actual lunar surface altogether.

It is a "connect the dots" type of thing for me. The lunar models, the astronauts voice recordings, Gary McKinnon, and the expert analysis of one Jack Arnesson....it all adds up for me.



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:53 PM by NavalFC
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to
post by angel of lightangelo



alive as in what? alive as in being taken seriously by anyone who matters and being given consideration? No.


Isn't it nice that you have a place like this where you can freely express your opinion?


indeed. I see it as a place where I can directly combat some nonsense from point of origin and stop its spread so that maybe just maybe one day the UFO phenomenon cant be approached from a scentific poit of view and be taken seriously


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:30 PM by NavalFC
reply to post by RFBurns



are you joking? I am ALL OVER the place on this board. Im sorry I am not a God and can not post on all threads at once, If I could that would be awesome though
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 9 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 12 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 19 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags