Is this breaking news? And wouldn't this be better posted in the Aliens and UFOs forum? EDIT: Post moved.

Interesting video, though I've always believed that the general consensus was rather close-minded when it came to alien tech. When people say that it's not even feasible to travel across space because it violates the laws of physics, consider that the the physics that we base our reality on could be as simple as adding two and two for an advanced civilization.

[edit on 3-12-2008 by Mekanic]

Completely nonsensical.

First off its not a news article its a youtube video..the media often actually investigates things andlooks for evidenc, which this video gives none..

Secondly do you actually understand ay of the physics being alleged? I doubt it. But Ill start by saying that gravity is a function of mass and is not effected by super fluids with ultra high viscocity. said fluids are subject to the laws of gravity to, whether or not a fermion or a Boson.

Bosons are not these elite uber anti gravity particles this video makes them out to be

The difference?
The nucleus of an atom can be fermion or boson depending on whether the total number of its protons and neutrons is odd or even. Thats VERY basic. It does get deeper and you get into determining the state of individual sub atomic particles based on their spin, and boson particles act as force carriers (strong/weak nuclear etc) but they themselves do not act to create anti gravity.

So this notion of usng a super fluid being converted into a boson to creat a gravity well is completely bogus.

Do you really believe that all the scientists across the US are still spo far behind in technology, yet this one guy on youtube figured out what they couldnt? wow.. he should get a patent!

Another bogus caim is with the quasi crystals which he says he craft were made out of, and indeed this is a hole in the Roswell story itsef:

The witnesses allege the Roswell material was so strong, that it could not be cut with a blow torch or bent with a sledgehammer, yet it blew into pieces so easily with a crash???? this doesnt make sense.
Also quasi crystals are not in destructible. This does not explain the aleged Roswell material, and like I said leaves holes.

This video is pure bunk, the author through in some highly technical language that most of the viewership wont understand but will be extremly enamored by to the point of belief, and it is utter nonsense.

"UTTER NONSENSE" "REDICULOUS"


I see your spreading love and joy from thread to thread there eh?



Typical.


How bout you show somethiing else besides the same trolling routine?



Cheers!!!!

I would be the last on this lone world in the entire universe to stand in your way to challenge anything.

Now that you know where I stand, at least let the rest try to come to their own conclusions. So far, dispite what you post in the topics, they all seem to end with the same thing...nonsense.

So what makes the previous posts any different when they all end with the same thing from you? I just want to know if you have anything else to end a post with other than nonsense.

JFYI...I used to be a worse skeptic than you are displaying here. But one day I woke up and looked out the 8x11 box and went byond the puppet strings of "Nasty Anomaly Scene Airbrushers" game a long time ago.

And also JFYI...not all things I see here I find to be real either. But I dont end every single post I have about them with utter nonsense.

Its almost like we dont have to even read your posts because the pattern is becomming regular that we already know what your going to say.


See the point now?


Hope so. Post away.


Cheers!!!!

Have a look at the UFO Physics link I sent.

Perhaps the most interesting work on "UFO technology" is the book "Unconventional Flying Objects" written by NASA aeronautical engineer Paul R. Hill in the 1970s and published in 1994 after he died.

Being an aeronautics eng, Hill evaluated UFO maneuvers and found them to be exactly right, making the (admittedly big) assumption that UFOs use a repulsive force field, much like gravity (which according to our understanding of Physics can be attractive only).

*wonders if the UFOs seen are nothing more than large rotating superconductors taking advantage of a phase differential of the magnetic lines of the earth itself... able to move independantly thereof by harmonizing with key points on the magnetic fields of the planet*...


Don't listen to me. I have no idea what I'm speaking of, but I have a good idea that NavalFC doesn't really either. I've yet to see that dude give an opinion on ANYTHING... Even if you agree with something he says/she says, it will still argue with you.

No, I HAVEN'T seen you give an opinion on anything. I have seen you ride the OP of each thread you have participated in.

In THIS CASE, the OP was giving information and said, upfront, that they aren't up on the physics jargon.
You took the opportunity to ride he/she into the ground.

I am not "attacking the skeptic". I am stating the obvious. Read the post before you attack the messenger. It makes you look weak. It makes you look like you're basing your skepticism on fear.

Furthermore, out of curiousity, are you drunk tonight?

When someone says: "Hey guys, I'm not sure what this stuff means, any help" (which was in essence what the OP stated) it is CHILDISH to ask them "Furthermore, do you even UNDERSTAND the physics being applied here?"

Give me a break, dude.

[edit on 3-12-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

[edit on 3-12-2008 by Jay-in-AR]

Oh, and btw, I'm not a "proonent" of this thread, whatever that means...

As I said before, I don't know enough about the physics either. Although I understand a little, I'm not knowledgable enough to know for certain... (and I don't think you are either)

So, like all things, I file this away and study it at my leisure. If something comes up, I have learned something.
On the other hand, you simply wish to regurgitate the same thing in each thread you visit. Each with just a different justification for doing so. You don't know either.

"This video seems to be of higher quality than most, very informative - some of the terminology I didn't follow"... newatlasmason


"Secondly do you actually understand ay of the physics being alleged?"... NavalFC

Yes, you DID use the opportunity to simply argue for no reason. There was no call for it.