reply to post by warrenb
Thank you for that link, Warren. I was looking at the BLS web page & pdf files over lunch, trying to piece that information together, and wasn't
having much luck decyphering it. The truly sick thing about them not counting anyone who's been unemployed over 27 weeks is that as we get deeper
into this pit more and more people will fall under that umbrella, meaning they have stacked the deck in such a way that it will be almost impossible
for us to reach an accurately reported on Depression era unemployment rate, even though the reality fo teh situation is that if the numbers were
calculated using the depression era methodolgy, we'd probably be seeing comparable numbers with the first year of that event.