Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
I'd be really interested to see what this statement is based on:
"Gone, gone, gone are all of FDA's claims that no science exists that amalgam is unsafe,"
All the big studies, from all over the world, have found amalgam to be perfectly safe - it's not like nobody has looked into it.
What new science has come to light that put's it's safety in doubt?
Huh, all over the world? Didn't the article just say some countries have limited/ban its use? The article also states that it's known that mercury
vaporizes with stimulation. (FACT) Yeah... inhaling mercury, not so safe. Mad hatter ring a bell?
While this is an intriguing article it fails to point to any actual FDA links or documents that they are saying amalgams are dangerous. Without
providing anything other than sentences with quote marks around them as a source I question the validity of the article itself.
I would also like to add that to the best of my research and discussions with my uncle (who is a dentist) this whole argument is wrong.
My 2 cents.
Obs out
Normally in lawsuits, one would have to have proof to have a case. Also the fact the FDA settled it means they knew they couldn't stand up to
scrutiny under the information the plaintiffs provided.
I am not sure what you both are trying to say... that putting mercury, a known toxic substance, in your mouth is somehow safe? The fact anyone would
believe that is just boggling to the mind. What's next, cigarettes are good for you?
Watching this video of mercury spewing from a filling as vapor, plus the numerous reports of being unsafe, I wouldn't want that in my mouth.
iaomt.org...
The FDA took their sweet time admitting Mexican peppers were unsafe and that the Chinese imports of milk products were tainted with with Melamine.
With that recent track record, I have no clue why you people would believe them still. If you still think they trying to protect the public, then I
kind of feel sorry for you.
[edit on 5-12-2008 by ragnarak]