College May Become Unaffordable for Most in U.S. , page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 05:24 PM by FoxStriker
reply to post by burdman30ott6



seems like your on the ball about colleges, got a question for you bro...

Does a Degree matter or a license/Certification for you to do your job.

From what I've seen, Employers give jobs on personality and experience over a bachelors they know they have to give higher salary for.

I've beaten out pleanty of more qualified people for jobs. That includes Masters and Bachelors.

What are you thoughts???


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 05:27 PM by Seekingmyself
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Originally posted by Seekingmyself

a bachelors degree is becoming a high school diploma; soon you won't be able to find a job without it. I don't understand why the cost of tuition has risen so much.


It has become so expensive because they're trying to restore some balance. If a bachelor's degree has become a high school diploma, then that means with said bachelor's degree you should only be entitled to a comparable career and salary that the previous generations high school graduate recieved. Welcome to the career of ditch-digger, twenty-first century style, in other words. Like I said above, it used to be an honor and a rarity for a family member to get a college degree. We need to return to those days ASAP. Cheap higher education is one of the primary reasons inflation has outstripped the growth of personal income. Back in the day middle class kids could have a prayer to lift themselves out of middle class by getting the college education which made them a valuable commodity and provided them with a better salary. Unfortunately, once that degree is no longer an exception, but has become the rule amongst young people looking for employment, the employers have a larger crop to choose from and do not have to pay the better wages anymore to lure the once-rare college grad into their fold.


So it seems to be a very vicious cycle then, yes? I think part of it may be that each generation had more kids going off to college. Parents who have degrees are much more expectant that their children get an education. That being said, I feel that you are looked down upon if you do not attend college. I was a very rare person....my dad did not want me to go to college, he thought I should join the army instead. I think he forgot how sensitive and girly I am, haha. But it is EXPECTED of you to go to college these days...if you don't, you are a slacker, even if you work hard full-time and work your way up. I agree with you, it should be an honor to go to college, not a right.

With that said, something still needs to be done. Furthering of an education is a very desirable goal, in my opinion. I enjoy learning...but I don't enjoy paying for it. The way that our government lends us aid is all wrong. My dad is not supporting me at all, like I said, he did not want me to go. The FAFSA (Federal financial aid) is all backwards. The amount of aid you receive is only based on your parents' income. The only way it is not based on your parents' income is if you are 24, married, or have a baby. I know a lot of people who are going to school for almost free because they have a kid....which is ridiculous, why are we rewarding those who have children from a one night stand or when they are 16? The other issue I have is that you could get kicked out by your parents when you are 18, and paying all of your own bills and rent, etc. Your income is STILL based on your parents' income, and if they make 75k a year, you are out of luck and can't strive to further your education until you meet one of the qualifications to be a dependent student. That has always bothered me.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 05:37 PM by hinky
reply to post by burdman30ott6



The classes you took in your professional education exposed you to engineering programs and opportunities that most engineers don't know about. The term would be "well rounded education" and now you know of some of the engineering world you really do not want to be involved with.

But what's to say 5 years from now you may want to be an engineer supervisor working on a (place project here) but the requirement of theoretical hydrology was a requirement. Same applies for math and software development for control systems that are only in conceptual stages. A very strong math background is needed. You took classes that you don't need, now, but you are just starting out and 5 to 10 years from now, who knows what engineering skills you will be using.

Congrats, and you got the world by the tail but don't even know it.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 06:15 PM by xpert11
reply to post by burdman30ott6



First off all excellent post .
Don't the people wanting to study more technical trades go to technical schools that have differnt names depending on your location or in the US can a one become say a qualified doctor without going to university ?

I do not wish to devalue any hard work that you put into your degree . Now that I have got that out of the way .

A lot depends on the curriculum that an education provider is offering it makes sense that engineering you involve a lot of depth in study . In other areas of study it is possible depending on the training provider that you can study for less time and get the same qualification . This is what I found with IT in Chirstchurch . Although in the end I wasted my time because experience won out over my qualifications and plans for future study every time .

Now it makes sense that engineering and medicine would have a lot of in depth study in the class room as well as learning of a practical nature . To make my point about there being a lack of " on the job " training I will use the example of nursing . Thirty odd years ago before I was around members of my family underwent successfully I might add training to become Nurses. Back then before some undertook nursing training you took an exam to see if you had a personality that is suited to the job . If you failed the initial test no real harm was done you simply went and made another career choice . Today nursing students don't sit such an exam and when they first hit the wards they don't have a clue what to do and they may not even be suitable for nursing in the first place .

My view is that higher education should be affordable to those who really want it . Rather then spending more money the likes of arts degree should be cut from government funding allowing for the likes of engineering degrees to become more affordable . Sure apprenticeships have been greatly devalued locally . Unless someone is sure that they want a to go to university they should look at doing an apprenticeship.

The problem of flooding the market with graduates is N/A in NZ due to skills shortages .


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 06:44 PM by americandingbat
I just want to link this thread into the discussion, because I think it's interesting that they're both getting play on the same day.

The thread I linked is about a study that demonstrated a difference in the way 9 and 10 year-olds brains react to stimuli based on socieconomic status.

Before you get all upset, that's a gross oversimplification and no opinion should be based on it. Read the thread if you're interested.

What I find really interesting is that both that thread and this speak so directly to the problem of social mobility and the myth we have that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 06:48 PM by tmbandt
reply to post by ChrisF231

Certainly state run systems are cheaper. But they are also held captive to the whims of the state.

State run systems = sheeple factories IMO.



reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 09:31 PM by projectvxn
reply to post by TheWayISeeIt



The higher "education" system is nothing more than another HUGE debt generating scheme. And under it's current model it will fail along with every other part of the American Empire. Because the entire thing is one giant debt generating cluster-#, and these things tend to come to a halt in rather devastating ways.

It runs entirely on loan structures and Federal/State funding which is also borrowed money. I guess socialism is only evil when it benefits the middle-class. This is going to do 2 things. Crush students under debt to pay for inadequate schooling, and phase out an entire generation of minds that will further turn this country into a 3rd world nation where the only power and prosperity lies in the military and government.

[edit on 3-12-2008 by projectvxn]


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 10:12 PM by wheresthetruth
I am currently attending a Junior College. I am one of the lucky few that has a company footing a large percentage of the bill. This makes is more affordable on me, just like so many that graduate with good grades get companies that reimburse them to pay off loans.

I have to say from first hand experience that there are some kids that do not belong in college until they mature a bit. Some of them are there just for the sake of being there. They end up auditing or dropping the class at the last minute, making the money and time spent worthless.

As far as tuitions going up, there is a reason for that as well. Do you know how much some of the computer software costs that these courses are using? You can teach a modern day class with out dated software. You cant run new software on outdated computers. This costs tons of money. Teachers make pretty darn good salaries as well. You cant ask a master's degree holder to teach for $60k a year. They would laugh at you. Forget asking a PhD unless you have a lot of cash to throw at them. Most campuses now have their own private law enforcement. These guys are just like cops, only the salary is better.

All of this is hardly offset with government grant money, which a lot of Junior and Senior colleges get. So, as the costs go up, so do the tuitions.

I would love to see free secondary education up to at least Graduate level. I know that it will not happen anytime soon. It would take a corporate tax rate of about 70% and an income tax rate of 50% just to pull it off. Then the people who dont choose college are the ones crying because they are funding all the education for nothing.

Its a sharp and deadly sword. For now, I cut out my nightlife and apply that money to my books.

Oh, did I forget to mention that apart from being a full time student, I also work full time as well? Sleep during the week is limited to around 4 hours a night and weekends are nothing but study and homework. Dont tell me about how hard people have it. I just have resolve to sacrifice for however many years it takes to see myself with a career boosting degree along with all of the experience I am gaining on the way.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 11:37 PM by TheWayISeeIt
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to
post by TheWayISeeIt



The higher "education" system is nothing more than another HUGE debt generating scheme. And under it's current model it will fail along with every other part of the American Empire. Because the entire thing is one giant debt generating cluster-#, and these things tend to come to a halt in rather devastating ways.

It runs entirely on loan structures and Federal/State funding which is also borrowed money. I guess socialism is only evil when it benefits the middle-class. This is going to do 2 things. Crush students under debt to pay for inadequate schooling, and phase out an entire generation of minds that will further turn this country into a 3rd world nation where the only power and prosperity lies in the military and government.

[edit on 3-12-2008 by projectvxn]



And from this corner you hear a non-denominational, "Amen!!"


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 01:27 AM by projectvxn
reply to post by Johnmike



When education begins to suffer a massive shortage in funding everything you do while attending school will be placed further, and further out of your reach...Unless you're in a position where you can wait out the storm, if so, I'm happy for you and I hope your future is bright. But for many, many more this will not be the case. I posit only that an institution that function solely on credit and borrowed money will indeed collapse.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 01:35 AM by projectvxn
reply to post by SevenThunders



I posted on this matter not that long ago. Education in this country is just another form of control. But I don't know that it is creating socialists. I think it's only creating a grunt class because these kids these days are cheating their way through school and they don't know a bloody thing. This pool of inefficient brain power will also add to a shortfall in revenue as the rate of those who make it to a community college, let alone a university, will drop SHARPLY.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 10 hours ago, 90 replies
Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 12 hours ago, 70 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 58 replies
Iran sent pink drone to Obama
  World War Three, Posted 17 hours ago, 40 replies