Mkay, as a native Californian and libertarian, I concede a few points that have been made here. But so far, the majority of you "conservatives" are
generalists who are talking out their asses.
Yes, California is in bad shape, but it's not the leech welfare state so many of you who have never been here assume it to be.
If you want to prop up Mexico, you should pay for it. Not the other 49 states.
California's per capital federal tax burden is roughly 120% the national average. Size considered, the average for fed. spending is only 88%. You do
the math. Also, California ranks 49th of all US states in pork bills, federally funded programs, etc by CAGW.
By comparison, the closest state in terms of size and population, "conservative" Texas:
-Ranks dead last in capita tax burden
-Texas is #2 in per capita fed spending
-Texas is #40 in pork spending, which has fallen 10 places from just 2 years ago
Considering our population makes up 63% of the entire west coast, I'd say that this isn't bad at all (huge understatement). Our agricultural
industry is still by far our largest industry, and we're also ranked #1 by EERE for production of non-renewable energy.
Also, as pointed out above, most of California's coastal/urban centers are liberal, including San Francisco, San Diego, and Los Angeles. The rest of
the state is decidedly conservative, as you can see from Prop 8's massive defeat.
Also, I know I will be painted an Arnold sympathist for this, but our state's constitution is as much to blame for this as the governor's office is.
It requires a 2/3 majority vote in both houses to pass a budget. Arnold is still a firm critic of the various unions and entrenched special interests
that keep the state gerrymandered, and even though he's "environmentally progressive", he's still more fiscally conservative than a lot of other
governors.
California has submitted a final operating budget late for the last 22 years, so this is hardly unique. And certain props have limited the extent of
taxation, like Howard Jarvis' Prop 13, thereby further crippling the expansion of runaway debt.
Since you brought it up, I am very partial to a secessionist movement here. Why not? If welfare wastrel Alaska can have one, why can't we? Seems soon
we may actually get one off the ground. Maybe when we're gone you will find out exactly who was holding who on their shoulders, while we get our
affairs together for self-reliance.
California shrugged...
[edit on 4-12-2008 by SpencerJ]