reply to post by bloodcircle
That's sick, in my opinion. You'll willingly prevent others, who may GENUINELY be willing to submit their time and experience in order to solely
HELP PEOPLE, because you want to make a profit. That's what I'm hearing.
Find me a doctor who is not interested in financial or social (recognition) compensation for labor and you will find either the Mother Teresa of
doctors or a dead one. Everyone is motivated by money because money secures resources for them and their family.
And that is exactly what is wrong with the world. People like yourself who would condone the prevention of free thought on something that ha the
potential to help others, just because YOU got there first and want to keep all the money and glory for yourself.
Medical innovation is caused by two things: a desire to help others, and a desire to secure resources for themselves. Without the first there is no
purpose, without the second there is no motivation.
Read Next by the late and well missed Michael Crichton.
========================================
Both sides of the debate are wrong. One side argues that DNA patents are bad and the free market is to blame. The other side says these patents are
necessary for free market innovation.
These patents have nothing to do with free markets, and more to do with the use of the governments monopoly of violence to bastardize a free market
system. When the government steps in and 'regulates' or 'runs' an economy, or uses their guns to help a private corporation it is called
Corporatism (or Fascism if you prefer).
How can preventing others from investigating, experimenting with and being fully aware of a new breakthrough in healthcare, DRIVE healthcare providers
to greater hights, when it ties the hands of all but the ones who hold greed above human life?
With this statement you admit that its not the free market but the use of force by the government to prevent a free market to exist.