AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Other Current Events discussion forum.  (rss)


Mercenaries, Sonic Blasters No Match for Pirates


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 12:46 AM by ANNED


question for deltaalphanovember

Mercenaries???
three UNARMED security guards are "Mercenaries"

A mercenary is a person who takes part in an armed conflict, who is not a national or a party to the conflict, and is "motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar ranks and functions in the armed forces of that Party" (Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Convention of August 1949).[1][2]


If they are unarmed they are not mercenaries. period.
This is not a ARMED CONFLICT this is a bunch of criminals playing pirates no government is running this.
Even if the security guard were armed they would not be Mercenaries under international law.

Even Blackwater in Iraq is not Mercenaries because they are citizens of one party in the conflict. IE US Citizens

if i went to work for a shipping company as a armed guard on a ship and shot up a group of pirates i would not be a Mercenary.
(one) it would not be a WAR. because there are no governments claiming the pirates as troops.
(two) it happens in international waters out side the control of any one country.
(three) these are criminals.

(four) no actions of theses pirates comes under the Geneva Convention of August 1949
www.icrc.org...
in fact these pirates are in violation of the Geneva Convention of August 1949. and are not protected by it.


NOW explain why you use the term Mercenary in this tread.

All these UNARMED security guards are is stupid for trying to take on heavy armed pirates without weapons. mercenary they are not.

I know a few real mercenaries.
The funny part they were from your country of South Africa.



[edit on 4-12-2008 by ANNED]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 04:13 AM by deltaalphanovember


reply to post by ANNED



Anned, thanks for your question so we can clear it up quickly: I used the exact headline from the article that I quoted from as per the terms of ATS.
Therefore, the use of the word "mercenary" was not from me - any further issues, please take it up with the author of the original article.

Now, I agree with you regarding the strict definition of the word "mercenary". Basically they are guns for hire, and Africa has numerous tragic wars where mercenaries were used by various groups to further their aspirations.
Off-topic:
South Africa has been a prime supplier of mercenaries who were sourced from the old South African Defence Force when a large number of highly trained professional soldiers suddenly found themselves unemployed when the apartheid government was replaced with a democratically elected majority government.
Do a Google search for "south african mercenaries" and you will see just how South African soldiers have entrenched themselves throughout the various hot spots of the world as extremely valued soldiers. I am not sure whether this is something to be proud of, but since I have had a life where war/violence has been a constant companion (from a child growing up in a remote part of Rhodesia aka Zimbabwe where I endured terrorist attacks) I feel a guilty sense of pride that some of my compatriots are regarded as amoral efficient killers for hire.

Please note that I am anti-war and a relatively moral person - hence my "guilty" sense of pride. I would like to think that mercenaries have a place in the world and always will have - if used correctly they can go places and do things quickly - the UN usually debates things for years and one of the Superpowers seems to always veto any actual useful action.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 04:18 AM by deltaalphanovember


reply to post by dooper



An interesting post, thank you. You mentioned the use of booby-trapping munitions - may I ask what theatre of war this was?

I actually think it's a darn good idea - the only one punished by such an action is the person pulling the trigger. An eye for an eye.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 06:13 AM by ANNED


The navy seals booby trapped ammo in Vietnam.

I believe the US is doing it in iraq.
shock.military.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...

Ether that or the insurgents are dropping the bore ride pin before dropping the round down the tube.
www.socnet.com...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 02:56 PM by deltaboy


I remember listening to NPR news interview with the owner of the AntiPiracy Security Solutions in the morning a couple of days ago going to work. He says there would be 3 guards with no arms and just a sonic blaster to scare them off and that it will gurantee to work, guess this proves it. He also says that if the guards had carried weapons, they would be considered pirates as well, so they don't want to be on the same level as barbarians as the pirates. Way to go.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 03:08 PM by dooper


reply to post by deltaalphanovember



Amen. Former Rhodesian and South African forces were some of the best fighters in the world. They could do things it seemed no one else could.

About this definition crap. Why split hairs so definitively? It really serves no purpose. It would seem a more practical definition of a merc is one who has gun and will travel. For money.

Many like the lifestyle. Not that many really care for the money, it's the lifestyle they care for, and they don't differentiate too much as to whether a real, declared WAR is going on or not. They just like the fight.

And if somehow they are able to knock off some really bad guys in the process, that's a bonus. Adds a bit of moral legitimacy to the task.

These pirates can be taken down. But it's going to take some professionals who don't have a commander-in-chief, or national rules of engagement hanging over their heads. Like Mad Mike Hoare.

Just some serious men determined to end this activity. In any way they see fit, using any means at hand, without anyone looking over their shoulder.

Mercs. Armed security. In practice, the term really gets obscured.

After all, it's the result that count.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 03:24 PM by dooper


reply to post by deltaalphanovember



Delta, we were doing this in Vietnam. I spent many an hour "fixing" things to be 'found.' God, how I hate surprises!

I wrote a book which I sold a lot of in Washington, DC, and stressed this and other activities. The Army revised its FM to incorporate some of these concepts for the first time last year, and the Marines recently began a "Hunter" mindset training course that I stressed in my book as well. Apparently, it's a great success.

We BETTER be doing these things in Iraq and Afghanistan! It get really hard to hold a good target sight picture without flinching if you aren't real sure of whether the damned thing will go off in your face or not.

This pirate activity could be quickly reduced to insignificance in less than 6 months with three-score dedicated men. Bait. Use the right bait and you'll always get your prey.

There should be no prisoners. No survivors.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>

















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.014 seconds
Page processed in 0.119 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.