Holy cow!! Look at this earthquake data!!!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 06:24 AM by badmedia
6.0+ are rather large quakes. You wouldn't need very much to detect these, and they wouldn't go unnoticed.

In bay area cali, we had a 5.6 last year, and it was the largest quake since the world series quake. That means we have not had a quake that was above 6.0 in almost 20 years. And this in an area known for big quakes.

www.nytimes.com...

I'm not sure more advanced instruments and recording explains this. These things were surely known even back in the 90's when a quake of that size hit somewhere.

Statistics are notorious for not telling the entire truth, but I'm not sure if I'm buying the increase of information excuses. I know those things happen in other areas.

It is interesting to me for other reasons, and I take specific note that it all happens after 2001. But that might just be me being crazy, hope more info surfaces on this.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 07:51 AM by Realtruth
reply to post by downtown436




Whoo! Nice find. I don't even really know how to comment on this except the proof is in black and white.

No denying these facts.



reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 08:07 AM by questioningall
reply to post by downtown436



Awesome find!!!

It shows very real activity right now in a dramatic fashion!

People should call their insurance companies and make sure they are insured for earthquakes - it is not automatic!


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 09:29 AM by reugen
Originally posted by downtown436

I don't know if any of you have seen this but, here it is...........
www.thehorizonproject.com...
This is amazing.
It is a chart of destructive earthquakes over the last 100 years.


Interesting, but you have to consider that areas not populated 100 years ago are now populated plus the fact that earthquake measure methodology and instruments have improved and spread vastly over the globe recent years i.e the data is more and also more accurate.


[edit on 3-12-2008 by reugen]



reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 09:52 AM by rickyrrr
reply to post by jam321



Makes you wonder why earthquakes around unpopulated areas are not recorded.... if an earthquake happens in the middle of the woods and nobody is there to record it... does it show up in those records

-rrr


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 10:54 AM by cognoscente
reply to post by king9072


Ha ha. You have to be kidding me. A one decade sample size is hardly sufficient. And as for twenty years ago it is safe to assume that communications technology and information dissemination was substantially less effective, seeing as the Internet was very limited in its use.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 11:33 AM by Ex_MislTech
Originally posted by downtown436

I don't know if any of you have seen this but, here it is...........

www.thehorizonproject.com...


This is amazing.

It is a chart of destructive earthquakes over the last 100 years.


Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 3-12-2008 by Gemwolf]


I wonder if it is the ring of fire "waking up" so to speak to an
active period.

If so then we might also see an increase in volcanic activity.

That or some force in space putting extra gravimetric shear
on the planet ???

I looked at the locations of the quakes and most are pretty close
to the ring of fire.

The Ring of Fire

Hopefully nothing will trigger the one in the Canary Islands that
will set off the Mega-Tsunami that will wipe out the east coast.

Island of La Palma - Canary Islands - Cumbre Vieja

Based on the debris on the ocean floor this has happened many
times before.

I hope it gives some warning before it blows, supposedly heading inland
for about 20 miles will save ppl.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^