Originally posted by NavalFC
Originally posted by kidflash2008
reply to post by NavalFC
People who claim to be abducted and have implants removed from them is evidence. It may not be alien in nature, and many are actually natural
occurring or have explanations for them. It is the ones that produce signals, or have the nerve endings around them I think is interesting.
To ignore the implants completely is not logical, and against the scientific research for evidence that so many skeptics say is not there for the
phenomena.
There has never been any so calld implant removed that "sends signals" or has "nerve endings" othr then the tissue that overlapped inside their
body
When doing actual research (as opposed to arm chair quarterbacking the experiences of others) scientists interview their volunteer (target)
population. For example, the CDC spent literally years researching their volunteer populations for HIV to be sure that they had nailed down the exact
"how" of transmissions. Have you, personally, interviewed abductees who claim to be implanted? Would you change or alter your stance if say 80% of
them were former US Armed Forces members? That could open up the playing field to these objects not being ET implants, but US government
nanotechnology experiments.
I don't think you can make a judgment on this issue because you don't have a complete set of facts. Science and scientific research is limited when
you create conclusion and then work backwards. You then are relegated to isogesis, and that is not particularly helpful to anyone.
You are essentially saying that you don't believe in them, and, worse, are asking people to "prove" the existence of them without providing your
criteria for what consists of evidence and/or what would trigger a positive verification and/or validation. That is not true "skepsis". That is
cynicism disguised as skepticism.
The ancients knew what skepticism truly was and that is a questioning of a subject; not the doubting of it. Had they doubted and then subjected free
thinkers to the slings and arrows of public humiliation you, Sir, would be wearing a wool tunic and thinking that those shiny things in the sky were
holes in the celestial window.
I assume by NavalFC you are a Navy Fire Controlman, yes? You are well-aware that the military uses nanotechnology for tracking and monitoring. Some
of that technology is disguised as foreign objects. If they implanted someone, a foreign national or hostile, with something that looks like the RFID
it would show up on a regular XRay and potentially be removed. Perhaps, a logical hypothesis based on how we humans act in similar situations would
be to assume that, like us, aliens are making it difficult for them to be removed.
Now, I am not saying that they (implants) exist, but I am open to the possibility and may conjecture without buy in the "whys" of alien abduction
and their potential approach. Allowing myself to be open also prevents me from looking like a total jerkoff if it is later proven to be true.
For example, do we not research at danger species by abducting them, chipping them, and then tracking them? Perhaps, this is what is happening?
I don't know, but I don't ever want to limit myself to the possibilities of something simply because I have not seen it with my own eyes. I don't
ever again want to say to someone: prove it! I'd rather ask them to explain it to me.
[edit on 3-12-2008 by Rintendo]
[edit on 3-12-2008 by Rintendo]
If someone was found to have implants, someone would still say it's fake? I
guess the denial never ends with some people. Whatever makes you happy.
