It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tinkabit
Human Psychology:
Those that have a secret, hide it.
Privacy? People that concerned with privacy for the sake of privacy, do not stick their big toe into a political area. It is the nature of the game.
Originally posted by Tinkabit
Here is a lovely example for all you who cannnot understand that, if this is such an issue, why is it not in the MSM???
I believe you are truly looking for some satisfying answers here.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Right-wing? Congratulations! You have the honor of being the person to complete the list of pidgeon-holes I have been inserted into. Left, Right, Liberal, Conservative, "mercenary"; AWESOME!
I am asking for evidence too. You want me to provide you with what? Proof that I haven't seen an official affirmative declaration of his 'natural born status'?
What sources can I offer, I want sources myself. One court ruling, one state official, one person empowered and authorized by the government to simply state "Barak Obama meets the criteria as a natural born American Citizen."
Am I not allowed to ask? Do I not rate an actual answer? - Then say so.
Presumptively many here agree that American people have no right to ask for the assurance that this 230 year-old requirement is met. I am simply begging to differ in that opinion.
Edit to add: What far-right blog are you thinking I am sourcing? I have said nothing here that hasn't originated from me - and if I did, I am sure I would have attributed it to it's rightful author.
Originally posted by Tinkabit
we diggers of the non MSM truth have to uncover this stuff from rocks flung into the far corners of the internet.
Originally posted by Tinkabit
But what do I know?
Some people that do not accept pat answers have thier spider senses tingling over this issue.
Many recognize that ANY candidate that got that far, only did so with the Elites' backing.....note Ron Paul , speaking the truth, media ignoring all the while......
Something is not right, and it may even have been manufactured.....a manufactured crisis? NOT in America???
Originally posted by Tinkabit
reply to post by maybereal11
Try clicking on some of the links I have posted in this thread....if you are on this website, you should know better than to just ingest quietly whatever the MSM feeds you...
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
reply to post by Kailassa
no I meant the document expert that has testified in courts in cases on documents.
However I do find the people supporting Barrack on this to be very hypocritical, . . .
Riddle me this Batman...
If all you say is true . . .
why did Barracks lawyers claim privacy issues and harms?
Why if it's all easy cheesy doesn't your man Barrack just get a certified copy of the Hawaiian BC and release it?
Seems to me you want to put the onus on us to prove a negative instead of on the candidate himself, interesting to say the least. Or is it that you don't care if he is eligible for the job? What if it was Bush or Cheney, would you be so willing to just TRUST THEM???
If there is nothing to it he should release it yet he releases attorneys to hide it giving threads and stories like this footholds, why?
Again I think it's on purpose but I don't have a dog in this hunt. I am not a Republican or a Democrat nor am I black voter that only voted for the black guy cause he was black...
I think the proof of the pudding is in the eating and this BC thing is Barracks to clear up, and if he don't release a certified copy be sure to recall your stance when a Republican or Independent runs with questions of his Birth or eligibility,
I am sure you won't because this isn't about Right or Wrong with most of you it's about some political party or skin color..
Disgusting to me as an AMERICAN to say the least..
I question everything and everyone in Government I do NOT only question those I dislike or disagree with, but then I am a TRUE PATRIOT according to the founders and not a sunshine soldier and summer Patriot,...
Originally posted by Tinkabit
reply to post by maybereal11
Again, I ask you.
Where do you expect to find any information if the Media is bias? You have to lift some rocks.
If this offends your tender sensibilities, well then there is always MTV.
Did you really think they would be making it that easy for you?????
He has said it,
his family has said it,
the state of Hawaii has confirmed the legitimacy of the document,
2 birth announcements have been found in the physical newspaper archives in Hawaii
numerous fact checking organizations have investigated and found no merit to the whisper campaign
no court has found Berg's or any other case worth even hearing...
What do you consider an Affirmative Declaration?
The court feels the premise of the question is not credible and all of the evidence available shows the contrary.
The requirement has BEEN MET.
Uness you have strong evidence to the contrary the courts rightly are not interested in giving an audience to unsubstantiated fringe partisan rumor mongering.
Originally posted by danx
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
If all you say is true why did Barracks lawyers claim privacy issues and harms?
As far as I know, that's not exactly what happened. What Obama's lawyers have claimed is that Berg's lawsuit was without merit, and apparently the (lower) Court agreed and dismissed the case.
The privacy issues were claimed by Hawaiian officials, who said that according to State laws they couldn't release Barack Obama's birth certificate.
In response to a series of attacks from John Edwards on Cheney's tenure as CEO of Halliburton, the vice president said that Kerry and Edwards "know the charges are false. They know that if you go, for example, to factcheck.com, an independent Web site sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania, you can get the specific details with respect to Halliburton." One problem with Cheney's rebuttal: He misspoke. He meant to say "factcheck.org," rather than ".com." According to the Wall Street Journal, the company that owns factcheck.com, Name Administration Inc., took advantage of Cheney's error to redirect traffic to a page titled, "Why we must not re-elect President Bush: a personal message from George Soros."