Obama Birth Certificate Rears Its Head - Again, page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 02:54 AM by Mikey84
Originally posted by SourGrapes
Originally posted by Mikey84
Your original birth certificate is not just the 1st one you were issued with (most don’t last more than 10 years). An original birth certificate is ANY that is issued from the department that holds the record, for example I was born in 1984, my original birth certificate has the issue date of 2006 on it, is it my original? YES! The one I had before that got ripped and worn out, was it an original also? YES!


Well, the state of Hawaii seems to believe there is a
difference between the two documents:


In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.




Learn how these things work.


Touche, my friend.


-Sour

[edit on 4-12-2008 by SourGrapes]



Thanks, that actually back up what I said. Also if you look at Obamas original birth cert provided (google it) it's green!

Mikey


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 08:03 AM by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Tinkabit



From your "source"

The opinions expressed in this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, or philosophy of Borderfire Report.


You're quoting an opinion editorial!!! Someone's opinion!

This is why you have lost all credibility with me. I'm sorry to be so harsh, but you're believing rubbish.

Obama has not "snubbed" the highest court in the land because he was not advised to respond to Donofrio v Wells by 1 December. Where's the Source???

Just because you read it in some blog or Op Ed doesn't make it true!

Secondly, His Hawaiian BC was NOT "sealed away" by the governor or ANYONE.

You don't want the truth or you would be taking every chance you can find to further these FALSE rumors.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
SlObamanites


Who are you and what have you done with TrueAmerican?

[edit on 4-12-2008 by Benevolent Heretic]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 08:16 AM by Mikey84
reply to post by FlyersFan



If you are so sure he was not born in the USA, then why don’t you prove it? You are making the claim, so back it up. There is enough evidence to show he was born in the USA.

Simple, Kenya like most countries has birth certs, go find his Kenya birth cert.

Mikey


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:06 AM by danx
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to
post by Tinkabit



You're quoting an opinion editorial!!! Someone's opinion!

This is why you have lost all credibility with me. I'm sorry to be so harsh, but you're believing rubbish.

Obama has not "snubbed" the highest court in the land because he was not advised to respond to Donofrio v Wells by 1 December. Where's the Source???


BH is right, Tinkabit.

Also, if you had read the Comments on the page of your own source you would see someone's explanation of what it all means:

1) December 1 was the deadline for participants in the Berg case to provide any relevant or supporting evidence for their cases. Obama was (and is) under no obligation to provide anything by that date at all. In fact, it would be unusual for him to do so. Now that the deadline has passed, a judge will decide whether to recommend that the case go to conference at some later date.

2) The purpose of the conference (like the one for the Donofrio case on the 5th) is to decide whether the court will consider the merits of the case. Most cases do not reach this point, and very few are actually considered by the entire court. Don't hold your breath on this one.



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:03 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Tinkabit
www.youtube.com...

FACT: Our constitution still matters.
So this is a commercial? I wonder if it will see air time?
I kinda doubt it. It's probably just an internet thing.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:03 AM by danx
Originally posted by Tinkabit

BREAKING NEWS: NEW COMMERCIAL AIRING:

www.youtube.com...

Do you feel it explains the issue well for most people to understand?


I'm sure that it will work with:

1) people who know nothing about this

2) people who know nothing about legal procedures, and

3) people who already believe Obama is Satan/a Muslim terrorist/Hitler II/<insert other crazy comparisons here>


The ad suffers from the same problems that have been discussed and pointed here now to exhaustion.

Nowhere in the TV ad (if this is indeed a TV ad and not just some montage one of you did on your Mac) there is a source, except for one Dr. Ron Polarik when the voice over says "experts have called that a forgery".

Experts? You mean that guy hiding his face?



[edit on 4-12-2008 by danx]



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:04 AM by Tinkabit
reply to post by danx



I appreciate you questioning the sources, however we must allow for the MSM balckout or relative silence on this issue. I have found information from where it was available. Since yesterday, however, more and more reports in the more-mainer stream are picking it up ....I will post some of them that I can locate:

www.worldnetdaily.com...

english.pravda.ru...

[edit on 4-12-2008 by Tinkabit]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:24 AM by Benevolent Heretic
I thought this was appropriate here:

The Cult of Barack Obama's Birth Certificate Love that title!


Is this really about upholding The Constitution? Or are these just pious claims made to keep a candidate that these fringe few did not choose out of the White House?

Cue to the many who still rehash these same tired lines about wondering who the "real" Obama is. Cue to the trite talking points about how, if people really knew Obama, they wouldn't have voted for him. Isn't that what this all plays to? The fear of the unknown? Who is this man that traveled all across the country, telling stories about his family, gas prices, an unjust war, economic collapse, and selling "hope?"

Isn't this all about disliking a candidate so much, and going to the ends of the earth to find the dirt to prove that there was valid reason for detest? A reason to scream," See! Obama really was a big old fraud!" For the few on that mind-numbing journey, I too have an open letter:


I recommend reading the letter...


I'm curious to why it's taken so long for those like you to "know" Barack Obama. It seems Sarah Palin was deemed "all-American" after a 20 minute speech she gave two weeks after being thrust into the political spotlight. Obama rigorously campaigned all over this nation for 2 years.


[edit on 4-12-2008 by Benevolent Heretic]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:38 AM by Tinkabit
www.thebulletin.us...

As a side to BH:

My only interest in this is as a puzzle that still needs to be solved.

Politics in general is to me a game played by the Puppeteers and I belong to no party.

My suspicions about Obama are only the same as ANY politician that makes it this far: that you are not elected but selected. No matter who the Elites place in power, their chosen one will have to do their bidding.

Now, some believe that somehow Obama has managed to shake off that system and get around them and that is why he is the New Messiah: I do not share that optimism. Anyone that is allowed to progress that far, mst be complicit with the system, Palin, McCain included. They are warned if they do not cooperate. They are rewarded for compliance. The only one that got away, IMHO was Kennedy. And look how he ended up. Take a listen to his speech on secret Societies, it is quite revealing: he still warns us from the grave.

And look how he ended up.

If Obama is the real deal, then I fear the same fate for him, as these Global Elites do not mess around, they control the vertical and the horizontal. They are probably having spies montior this very blog.

I find it cute how eveyone thinks I am some disappointed Republican.
You are way off, and need to at least allow for the fact that others are coming at this from a different perspective.

You also should understand that this is a global issue. What happens with America affects the world, an especially its neighbours and allies.

WE are on this big old blue marble together. I hope to have this puzzle resolved in a way that creates a peacful situation for all concerned.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:41 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by Tinkabit
I appreciate you questioning the sources, however we must allow for the MSM balckout or relative silence on this issue. I have found information from where it was available. Since yesterday, however, more and more reports in the more-mainer stream are picking it up ....I will post some of them that I can locate:

www.worldnetdaily.com...

english.pravda.ru...


So to back up the baseless rumours you have been repeating, you first use a series of blogs, and now you use an article in Pravda (lololol) which references the Berg blog, and an article on World Net Daily which references the Pravda article . . .

You obviously have no understanding of facts or the concept of proof.

You said earlier you were a teacher and I got the impression your work included teaching students to provide source materials for their essays.
I hope I was mistaken.

Vicious rumours spread.

Repeating what people say,
who are repeating or even embroidering the original rumour,
does nothing to suggest the original rumour had any truth to it.

rumour != information


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:45 AM by Tinkabit
reply to post by Kailassa



You are on an internet site that is in the business of looking at alternate news that does not come from the MSM. The general idea is that the MSM only reports what the owners of the Media wants you to be aware of.

You are asking me to prove the truth with misleading MSM news sources.

I find you statements ironic. I could have used the harsher term, hypocritical, but I did not feel it would establish a proper tone.




[edit on 4-12-2008 by Tinkabit]
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags