the most dangerous video on the internet, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 07:32 AM by GodshipForAll
reply to post by GRANDWORLDDRAMA



Why does a belief in god mean anything I put a belief in humanity before any God.

Besides the Venus project seems logical.
The Venus Project


It's not perfect even they say that but it's alot better than the current establishment.

An economy actually based on something....resources!!! wow...lol

Can't watch the video, damn Dail up.

Anyone else down with the Venus Project over our current way of life????


Peace


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 07:35 AM by vehemes terra eternus
reply to post by Nebadon



Thanks for the clip amigo it was brilliantly blunt and a little scary. The matrix is a great metaphor, I use it regularly when discussing the world situation.
The whole 'livestock' idea takes it to another level again.

I have to say that it made a whole lot of sense. The already worrisome situation is seemingly getting worse.

Sure times will be tough if we all take the red pill but it is a sacrifice I would willingly take if it meant we had a chance, one chance at attaining and sustaining a compassionate system.


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 07:38 AM by vehemes terra eternus
reply to post by GodshipForAll



Yea I saw them on Zeitgeist 2 and I must say it sounded wonderfully revolutionary. Much easier said than done though huh. It is going to take a gargantuan effort to wrest control from the inbred rulers of the farm....


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 07:40 AM by Nivek Serca
reply to post by Nebadon



that's true if you think Humanity can't work together with compassion...

I think through out History we have proven we cannot work together. All things start with a Utopian idea but someone comes along in the future without the same kind of ideals and is intelligent enough with selfish motivsation to gain power for their own wants.

I am sorry I do not believe man can exist in any type of Utopia in the state we are in.


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 08:06 AM by ConspiracyNut23
reply to post by GRANDWORLDDRAMA


Yet your gods (both father and son) seem eerily comfortable with the concept of slavery...

Could it be because the men who developed the Hebrew/Christian mythology were themselves supportive of slavery?

What the author said is:
Religion is pimped-out superstition, designed to drug children with fears that they will endlessly pay to have “alleviated.”

and
The opposite of superstition is not another superstition, but the truth.


You use the word "belief" which is really just an euphemism for the word superstition. I for one, agree 100% with the author's assertions quoted above.

reply to post by GodshipForAll


You can read a transcript on the author's website. (as a matter of fact it's much faster to read it yourself since the author speaks very, very slowly.)


[edit on 2/12/08 by ConspiracyNut23]


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 08:44 AM by predisposed
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I forgot to mention that Animal Farm was required reading when I was schooled. The whole premise is a well debated idea.


You make a good point but miss the determining factor which is this.

Firstly 80-90% of the food production/car production products, gas supply, electricity generation is machine operated.

when one used to require a team of 2000 men to operate a car plant or factory, now a team of 20 can do the same, by overlooking the machines.

The material is mined and produced predominantly by machines, that do not require paying if you like, so actually the reason why we pay similar if not higher costs is not because we have to, it is for the profit of the few.

Now actually money is a way of control, because, if the government said, for 4 hours a day you need to do exactly what I say, in the form of labour, there would be resistance, and it is simply not practical, but to take 40% of the money, is effectvely doing the same thing.

Now if governments were to shut down, and every one be free from the prisons, this would ofcourse be ridiculous.

But the point is that we need to be free of our control, not to go back to survival of the fittest, and the two are not synomous. Why is crime committed? Very often it is because of lack of food, money, and so on.

If 80-90% of the entire food and energy production is automated, and the costs reflect that, then well, the corporations who control us would not make money, and then we would, if keeping the monetary system, have to work fewer hours.

Well, what would that do? Well it would give us more time. And time is freedom, free time. The reason why most people can justify that we are free is because we have free time, but there are several reasons why we are not free and why we are being kept as prisoners for no need.


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 08:56 AM by Motoman 1000
reply to post by Nebadon



Excellent food for thought. I have always said that we are not truly free, we are merely economic slaves.
While many people seem to think we cannot live without a government for fear of chaos, perhaps at some point in nour evolution we can learn to live with each other with respect and not be so self abosrbed. If we could have the attitude that "true living is living for others", then maybe we could free ourselves and neighbors.


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 08:59 AM by predisposed
firstly lets identify by average the percentage of free time if you like we have.

Lets say, that the average person works 9-5, or 40 hours a week.

So, there are 24*7 or 168 hours in a week.

Lets say the average person likes to sleep 8 hours.

Take away 7*8, or 56 +40. That leaves 72 hours a week free so far.

Ok, so that is 72/168 or 43% (2sf) Ok, so lets realistically reduce some more time of that, to how much time can be dedicated to actually free thinking.

Ok. I will presume that a person spends 30 mins washing and bathing, and 1 hour eating and preparing meals a day. And 1 hour driving to and from work or travel. Lets reduce this then by another 2.5hours a day. or 18 hours a week.

Then you have around 54 hours a week. or 7-8 hours a day to think.

Ok, well then that sounds like we have a lot of free time.

we are free then right?

Well, Il chuck in a few other factors, relaxing, destressing, TV, facewank, chatting, dressing, masturbating. Ok whatever, rigtht, we have loads of free time.

I would say that we are about 25% free

And then you have the further limitations.

OK, so lets talk for a moment about why the average person is a slave, and discuss the concept and benefits to the system operators of why free range humans are better.

So you take home 200 pounds a week, you pay for your own accomodation, heating, food, etc.

So you have to work, and further more the people you are working for do not pay any expenses. EG if you were a non free range slave, then you would have your expenses paid for, just the necesary for survival ones.

We agree that food bed and heating is requirement for living. But ofcourse from the £200 you take home a week, you must pay perhaps 75% of that on surviving. say 100 on rent, 30 on food, 20 on travel.

Well. so you have maybe 10 pounds a day to do with what you like. Well that gives you say 25% of the work hours you put in giving you freedom in the monetary controlled system. Ofcourse this is purely theoretical but applies to a majority.

Why is this relevant?

Why does this not have to be the case?

Firstly, it is relevant as money is the means to doing anything in this world. I can think, and when i have had time to think, and identify i have identified the fraudulant world.

it is relevant as with the 30% free time in the waking housr you have, when you are not too tired to focus and think, you are too distracted by other worries tv or the indoctrination to see through the lies. Further more to go back to the subject of being a farm member, and to reiterate on why blaine was incorrect to imply the need for government and hence the need to control, I will say this.

Sceptre vialis, rudementis obsolentalum.

Or in real terms, I am limited, I am vitally depleted so that it becomes statistically or probabilty wise, neigh on impossible to break out from the system, and even more, to realise I am within one.

I will continue.

Why does this not have to be the case? And to go back to the subject of automated production, will be my focus.


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 09:06 AM by ConspiracyNut23
reply to post by jimmyx


Originally posted by jimmyx
greed and violence of the few, are what all of us should be fighting, not the governments or institutions that they have comprimised.

I have to agree that governments are still essential institutions that must be preserved. Especially democratic governments. (the kind that actually hold a referendum when important issues arise, not the kind that attack foreign countries in defiance to its own population's will) A government by the people is really what is standing between us and them.

However some institutions, for example our modern corporations must be reexamined. The corporation's goal is to maximize profits in the shortest amount of time possible. (usually a quarter) These institutions are not simply compromised, their very existence must be redefined. (including the concept of corporate personhood)


[edit on 2/12/08 by ConspiracyNut23]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Startling revelations from a Swiss banking insider
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 12 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
MSM Try To Debunk Illuminati Denver Airport Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
They\'re Back!! Soros: Occupy To Turn Violent
  Posted 18 days ago with 8 member flags