posted on Dec, 2 2008 @ 08:59 AM
firstly lets identify by average the percentage of free time if you like we have.
Lets say, that the average person works 9-5, or 40 hours a week.
So, there are 24*7 or 168 hours in a week.
Lets say the average person likes to sleep 8 hours.
Take away 7*8, or 56 +40. That leaves 72 hours a week free so far.
Ok, so that is 72/168 or 43% (2sf) Ok, so lets realistically reduce some more time of that, to how much time can be dedicated to actually free
Ok. I will presume that a person spends 30 mins washing and bathing, and 1 hour eating and preparing meals a day. And 1 hour driving to and from work
or travel. Lets reduce this then by another 2.5hours a day. or 18 hours a week.
Then you have around 54 hours a week. or 7-8 hours a day to think.
Ok, well then that sounds like we have a lot of free time.
we are free then right?
Well, Il chuck in a few other factors, relaxing, destressing, TV, facewank, chatting, dressing, masturbating. Ok whatever, rigtht, we have loads of
I would say that we are about 25% free
And then you have the further limitations.
OK, so lets talk for a moment about why the average person is a slave, and discuss the concept and benefits to the system operators of why free range
humans are better.
So you take home 200 pounds a week, you pay for your own accomodation, heating, food, etc.
So you have to work, and further more the people you are working for do not pay any expenses. EG if you were a non free range slave, then you would
have your expenses paid for, just the necesary for survival ones.
We agree that food bed and heating is requirement for living. But ofcourse from the £200 you take home a week, you must pay perhaps 75% of that on
surviving. say 100 on rent, 30 on food, 20 on travel.
Well. so you have maybe 10 pounds a day to do with what you like. Well that gives you say 25% of the work hours you put in giving you freedom in the
monetary controlled system. Ofcourse this is purely theoretical but applies to a majority.
Why is this relevant?
Why does this not have to be the case?
Firstly, it is relevant as money is the means to doing anything in this world. I can think, and when i have had time to think, and identify i have
identified the fraudulant world.
it is relevant as with the 30% free time in the waking housr you have, when you are not too tired to focus and think, you are too distracted by other
worries tv or the indoctrination to see through the lies. Further more to go back to the subject of being a farm member, and to reiterate on why
blaine was incorrect to imply the need for government and hence the need to control, I will say this.
Sceptre vialis, rudementis obsolentalum.
Or in real terms, I am limited, I am vitally depleted so that it becomes statistically or probabilty wise, neigh on impossible to break out from the
system, and even more, to realise I am within one.
I will continue.
Why does this not have to be the case? And to go back to the subject of automated production, will be my focus.