Originally posted by jd140
You want to compare the way Obama is being treated to the way Bush is being treated.......ARE YOU KIDDING? Right now(emphasis added) President
Bush wouldn't be able to win a HS class President election. He is being bad mouthed by I think the new number is 80% of the American public.
That IS the case--Right Now. BUT, where were you when Bush ran in 2000? When his questionable military record first came up? His coke conviction?
His string of failed businesses? Nobody wanted to talk about that. In fact the right-wingers who control the MSM shut down ANY conversation that
headed in that direction.
In 2004 Dan Rather was set up to be the patsy when documents with accurate info verified by Bush's former CO, but with a questionable chain of
custody, surfaced and Rather made them public. The info in those documents was real, but because of how they came to Rather's hands they, and he,
were discredited.
Nobody wanted to hear it.
That info could have swayed the election for Kerry. But once Dan Rather took the fall, investigation stopped.
The whole thing was a deliberate set-up to silence legitimate debate.
Bush's records are sealed.
It doesn't matter what his status is
now. There was legitimate concern that he wasn't the right man for the job based on records of his
actual actions. To this day we don't know the evils that could have been prevented had Bush's records been public, and his campaign failed
on its own merits-or lack thereof.
The way I see it Obama is being treated a hell of alot better then President Bush is. Get off your high horse.
This is just false. During the campaign Obama recieved worse press than McCain, up until Palin started playing her character to the hilt and the MSM
couldn't ignore it anymore. Besides, the only reason they're playing "neutral" (if not nice) now is because Obama might reinstate the Fairness
Doctrine and re-regulate the media, and then they'd actually have to work for a living again instead of getting fat on money from all their
subsidiaries.