NDP, Bloc in coalition talks before fiscal update: tape, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 1-12-2008 @ 10:38 AM by unruly1

NDP, Bloc in coalition talks before fiscal update: tape




The New Democrats and Bloc Quebecois held talks to form a coalition party well before the opposition's uproar over the government's fiscal update, CTV News has learned.

NDP Leader Jack Layton was in talks with Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe for a "considerable period of time," reported CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife on Sunday.

Layton held a telephone-conference meeting with his caucus Saturday morning that was recorded by a Conservative member. According to the audio tape, Layton appears to take credit for the possibility of a coalition.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.cbc.ca



[edit: snippet & title to same as source]
Headline: Please use the original story headline from your source.

[edit on 1-12-2008 by 12m8keall2c]


reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 11:36 AM by johnsky
Woah there... lol.


You were quick to start getting angry, but you didn't make it clear for our foreign members exactly what you're angry at.

So I'll give a little back story.


A couple of months ago, the Canadian Federal Election was held.
It was held early because of threats from the opposition "Liberal" party to enact a vote of no confidence, claiming that the Canadian public doesn't trust the Conservative party.
The conservative party in return, pushed to have the election early to see what the people want.
The people voted the Conservatives right back into power.
Conservatives 143 seats
Liberals 77 seats
Bloq Quebecois 49 seats
New Democratic Party 37 seats
Independents 2 seats

Obviously the liberals were wrong, and the people did trust the Conservative party. The Liberal party also lost seats due to that election.

Well, Stephane Dion, the Liberal leader, didn't take too kindly to this. He can't seem to get over the fact that the people don't want him in power, and he's been making the usual threats again. He's been threatening to start a vote of no confidence and take parliament by default... which is only supposed to be used in the event of corruption or failure.

People didn't like the idea of being told a party is trying to sidestep their votes, and well, their voices are being heard.

So now Dion is trying a different strategy (all his strategies involve him being prime minister).
Now Dion wants to unite the Liberal party with another party to gain seat control over the parliament.

Remember those numbers?
Conservatives 143 seats
Liberals 77 seats
Bloq Quebecois 49 seats
New Democratic Party 37 seats
Independents 2 seats

In order to outvote the Conservatives he would have to unite the Liberals with the Bloq Quebecois, AND the New Democratic Party.

If you think this would work, you haven't seen them bicker. It's like they just killed each others respective mother and sat down to talk about it... these guys don't get along.

(And yes, the Bloq Quebecois' main goal is to separate Quebec from Canada... how they keep getting seats is beyond me.)


reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 11:37 AM by Nimrod
reply to post by unruly1




Treason ?

No taxation without representation.

I vote for whoever I want. If they don't want the Bloc in the chamber, then we shouldn't have to pay any federal taxes either.

What M. Harper has made by taping telephone line, reording private meeting; would be called in the USA : NIXONISM.



reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 11:54 AM by Nimrod
reply to post by KpxMarMoTT



I'm happy KPXMARMO that you feel free now.

May I suggest that you are a little bit confused, Hospitals are provincial jurisdiction, not federal. I don't trust much political parties. That does'nt means I don't care about, since they will very take care about you......for your interrests, but mostly for theirs.

I don't see where your standpoint is, about a coalition governement being illegal ?

Her Majesty appoints a governement, this goevrement must work by confidence by having a majority of MP members to support it. That's all.

It doesn't matters how is composed the goverment has long, it maintains the Chamber confidence.

Confidence may be removed, on a motion by opposition, on financial bill such as budget, or by will of the governing side.

Losing it....leads Her majesty or Her representative to ask if some parties could gain the confidence of the chamber in such a way that they could form a new government for a reasonnable time. If not, an election must be called.

We would'nt be to that point, if Harper had respected is OWN word and OWN law about elections in oct. 2009.


reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 04:34 PM by Rook1545
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck



My problem with all of this is that the PCs have been in power a total of 6 days. How is this not sour grapes?

If some of the ideas that the Liberals and NDP had during the election come to pass at the cost of Alberta and Saskatchewan, there will be backlash.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags