Only 10 days Left-Until Predicted Huge Earthquakes

You know, I have been looking at the 'language' for this 'event' and I am wondering if the prediction has to be a catastrophe? From what I have read about how this system supposedly works, the words that come out are symbolic and indicate the general emotional impression about the future event as pulled from subtle changes in language and context of words being posted to the internet. Could the whole 'release' language concerning 'forces giving away' and things like 'bladder/bowel release' maybe mean the international credit market will un-freeze and money will start to flow again?

Why does it have to be doom and gloom?

IF this bot is even close to a prediction (I may be inclined to believe it but I would say we could use a little more proof), then maybe the 'release' will be a good one?

I read UrbanSurvival.com most days because I love the writing style and there's always something that makes me smile and brightens my day, no matter how grim things are.

Anyway, there's a link to the full information about the webbot on the website - click here to go directly there.

There's other interesting links on that page too and for anyone that wants to find out for themselves what webbot is all about then I recommend taking a look.

Here's something from last Friday, at Urban Survival:--


I don't think that Cliff and Igor of www.halfpasthuman.com would mind my sharing a bit of the predictive linguistics from last week because this gunfire in the streets of India seems to be just a warm-up act.

I don't think that Cliff and Igor of www.halfpasthuman.com would mind my sharing a bit of the predictive linguistics from last week because this gunfire in the streets of India seems to be just a warm-up act. "As if the current rate of emotional tension release is not enough, there are indications from the movement of Populace/USofA entity through modelspace that [anger] and [rage], and [revenge] will be rising [visibility] within the [populace/usofa] from late in the day on December 1, and continuing to rise through to December 15th where it reaches a plateau that extends at the same level until late in January. The precipitating 'events' that will trigger the [onset of visible rage/anger] will themselves start to become [visible] just after midnight on the 26th of November. These events will continue at a low(ish) level through the last few days of November and then become much more dramatic in both [scope] and [presence] as we turn the calendar into December. The data sets indicate that the [financial calamity] of late September and early October *will* be revisited on a [scale/extent] that is both [broad] and [deep] within the USofA [financial structure(s)] over these 17/seventeen days (or thereabouts). The longer term data sets are indicating that the [manifesting circumstances] of this November 27th through to December 14th (more or less) will also be [echoed] again, only with more intensity, and at deeper levels of the [social economic order] from January 25th through February 14th."

There's also a link to this guy called Bruce Bueno de Mesquita who says mathematics can tell you the future. Before you dismiss him you should see the people he works for!

Just to throw in an opinion, it is of no importance of which disaster is going to happen when. Something is most likely going to happen somtime in the very near future. Being prepared is a smart thing no matter what. I don't buy into "the world will end at noon tommorow" , but that is not to say that I don't have a plan for a what if scenario. In case nobody noticed, things in the USA are best viewed through rose colored glassed these days. Words to live by given by my father, "live every day as if it was your last, but know that is probably is not."

And always remember, in a catastrophe, look to be friends with someone who knows how to brew beer.

reply to post by slymattb

"How many days do we have?"This is the best question in this whole thread in my opinion.No one is guaranteed a single day!
The physical stuff mentioned here of leaking from various orifices sounds like Ayahuasca to me.And that peristalsis is a good thing,in the proper place and context,of course.

From the Coast to Coast AM site, www.coasttocoastam.com... , here are some of the predictions George Ure shared on March 3rd, 2008:

In late March, look for massive unemployment to take hold.

During the summer, a backlash against the US government could involve a call to hold the elections early.

As the housing industry continues its collapse, there could be a seizure or lock-up of the ability to transfer property.

A "fuzzy revolution" could involve squatters or collectives moving into empty or foreclosed homes.

In October, there'll be a major stock market crash or a climate event that has a disastrous effect on the economy.

There could be a major bank failure, possibly involving a foreign bailout that is reneged upon.

A "global coastal event" within the next five years will involve a rise in sea levels that will knock out oil refineries.

There will be an untimely demise for millions by 2012, brought upon by some combination of pandemics, economic collapse, breakdown of health care and unknown energies from space.

reply to post by TSOM87


Yes and yes. The Web Bot program as run by HalfPastHuman and Urban Survival was created to detemine commercial "market" potentialities. It uses tech similar to the Princeton Global Consciousness Program. Both programs have been remarkably accurate in predicting a variety of events.

The Web Bot program outputs info in 2 categories: "Market" and "Terra". The first refers to financial markets while the second describes geophysical events. Both sometimes refer to military, politcal or social events but it seems only if those events directly impact the 2 main categories.

Web Bot seems to have called 9/11, the Asian seaquake/tidal wave and the Chinese quake. It also found info which in retrospect can be interpreted as the NE Blackout several years ago. The Princeton project seems to have found info indicating a serious emotional pre-cognitive response re 9/11. On the Princeton website (just Google GCP and look for the site) there is an interesting sub-menu item which shows the Princeton web bot output the evening of the recent Presidential election. The emotional output starts to peak "before" Obama's victory was announced or predicted by the media.

There is a large body of study which avoids the concept of physic capacities in humans but describes the more mainstream idea that humans to varying degrees can sense events which are immediately in the future. The greater an individual's capacity for this pre-cognition the great the resulting accuracy. You might spend a minute and Wiki Carl Jung and read the section on his theory of a human capacity to realize knowledge, including some sort of future events, on a subconscious level.

So...the Web Bot program is simply another tool. I'd use it.

As to Web Bot estimations on Market conditions over the past few months...it has been fairly accurate in describing events, timelines and results. Much of the online criticism has revolved around "inaccurate" Web Bot predictions of some events which are obvious long-term in nature and have effects which while triggered in Oct or Nov of 2008 won't manifest themselves for some time.

If any of this doesn't make sense to you...just post another set of questions.

OK, from what I have read on this thread and on the site posted several times, it looks like this is just some data mining with a natural language processing applied, so they can get, from what people write on the Internet, some trends about some (apparently economic) subjects.

This makes sense because economic trends are created by people, economy is an artificial thing.

But when applied to natural (and known as unpredictable) things like earthquakes and other natural disasters, it stops making sense in the way it was meant to be because people do not control those things.

So, if these things have been really predicted and happened, could it be that the people who write about them on the Internet (and which writings feed this system) are the ones who create them? Could it be that because thousands of people are worrying about earthquakes they create an earthquake without knowing that they were responsible for it?

If that is case, then we should start writing about good things, let's all write about me wining the lottery, for example, and see if it picks it up and it becomes true.

PS: as in most cases, I suppose that this only applies to English speaking people, so how could an earthquake in China could be predicted by English speaking people writing about it?

Originally posted by trueforger
reply to post by slymattb

 

"How many days do we have?"This is the best question in this whole thread in my opinion.No one is guaranteed a single day!
The physical stuff mentioned here of leaking from various orifices sounds like Ayahuasca to me.And that peristalsis is a good thing,in the proper place and context,of course.

they said between dec 10 and 15th.

it seems most of the stuff is pretty broad. If I have news from an entire earth to interpret into one of these predictions i'm bound to find something that fits. Also, if these webbots really feed off whats on the internet, wouldn't the majority of their pick ups be internet porn related?

reply to post by Merriman Weir


Has anyone here thought about or heard of a HAARP Weapon? Just asking what if many of these aren't so much "predictions" as they are "plans". China has been hit pretty hard by a HAARP Weapon from what i have seen just looking around on the web. I'm just asking what if?

Remember the executive Order Bush passed about making the president s office over-rides the legislative, executive and judicial branches of our government in case of another 911 (wink, wink India looks like a setup), or another disaster like Katrina (think natural looking but man made disaster using a HAARP Weapon, then look at this earthquake prediction, wink, wink)., I'm asking could this be just another crossfire angle to bring forth Martial law etc., NWO stuff? they alway seem to have more than one shooter.

We're so busy watching Barack, and Bush..just something to keep in mind.

Am I correct in understanding that the very same language they are now using (bowel release, bladder release, etc.) to supposedly predict 2 very significant and destructive earthquakes, was also being used back in November to predict some major event which was supposed to take place on the 14th (which never materialized, btw)?

I have to admit, I got worried a couple times, but right now, to me it's starting to feel like they're just changing their prediction to fit the language. What's that called, when the guy goes and shoots the side of his barn, and then paints a bullseye around it, and then goes and tells everyone what a great shot he is?

reply to post by ArMaP


I read that it doesn't just use text language, it breaks it down to mathematics. That may sound crazy until you read about Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. The article about him begins by asking

"Can a fringe branch of mathematics forecast the future? A special adviser to the CIA, Fortune 500 companies, and the U.S. Department of Defense certainly thinks so."

More of the article here

Maybe there is something to predictive linguistics, or whatever else it is/may be called. Britain is even getting CCTV cameras, connected to computers, that will be used to predict if someone is about to commit a crime. They've already been tried in some areas of the US, including New York. There's a thread here on ATS about it and if I can find it I'll post the link here.

Future technology, here we come!

And all this from a piece of code which scours the net for the most used terms in web pages, spits them out and then have a human decipher the results inevitably resulting in prediction of a catastrophe!

I think you're drastically simplifiying what the web-bot actually does. This summation greatly minimizes the accomplishment of thses programmers and the credit they deserve.

Originally posted by ArMaP

But when applied to natural (and known as unpredictable) things like earthquakes and other natural disasters, it stops making sense in the way it was meant to be because people do not control those things.

So, if these things have been really predicted and happened, could it be that the people who write about them on the Internet (and which writings feed this system) are the ones who create them? Could it be that because thousands of people are worrying about earthquakes they create an earthquake without knowing that they were responsible for it?


PS: as in most cases, I suppose that this only applies to English speaking people, so how could an earthquake in China could be predicted by English speaking people writing about it?

The web bot has gotten these earthquakes 1 1/2 years ago. the bande ache earthquake was 6 months before - we could not be writing about them, worrying about them at that time.

We all together make up a super consiousness - somehow we leak the future through our writings.

Regarding China: it was an emotional event still, webbot picks up emotional events, even for other countries. But since it was so far away, that is maybe why it didn't pick it up until a few days ahead of time. The whole thing is for real, and they have an excellent batting average!

Originally posted by nydsdan
You know, I have been looking at the 'language' for this 'event' and I am wondering if the prediction has to be a catastrophe? From what I have read about how this system supposedly works, the words that come out are symbolic and indicate the general emotional impression about the future event as pulled from subtle changes in language and context of words being posted to the internet. Could the whole 'release' language concerning 'forces giving away' and things like 'bladder/bowel release' maybe mean the international credit market will un-freeze and money will start to flow again?

Why does it have to be doom and gloom?

IF this bot is even close to a prediction (I may be inclined to believe it but I would say we could use a little more proof), then maybe the 'release' will be a good one?

Good point.

I thought the same thing or considered the same thing when reading the phrases.

reply to post by questioningall


add this to the list of lame predictions thats answer to it not happening is "whatever.. they still could happen".

i say we lock down this thread until dec 16th
before we have another GFL stiyle fiasco on our hands.

reply to post by Now_Then


yea..to be honest I do not take anything that serious....the scary thought phrase was inflected with a funny tone if spoken rather then typed although I see how it could be read as a "real scared" statement.


Makes me wonder about inflection on my other posts??!!

Actually there is something happening at this time as was mentioned with the New Madrid Fault. It is joined and larger then they had expected and things are happening that has great concern dealing with earthquakes in Arkansas right now.

A team is gathering eqipment as we speak and are in the process of trying to figure out what is happening.

I will see if I can find the article, I deleted it duh! but Kattrax has it in her thread but I can't locate the thread. I'll send off a e-mail to her and ask for her to resend it.

reply to post by Maya00a


That is not predicting the future, predicting the "outcome of virtually any international conflict, provided the basic input is accurate" is nothing new, that is what all specialist do when they analyse a situation, the fact that this guy created a mathematic model only shows that the way people act is predictable.

The case of CCTV cameras in the UK is the same thing, it's normal that people act in a way that shows their state of mind, and that is what they want to detect, but an obvious example would be a guy with something hiding his face, looking over his shoulder and leaving a bag outside a police station: anyone could tell that it was a suspicious behaviour.

And, back to this "bot", if they get their data from the Internet, then it can only be text, specially considering that this is from 2001, and at that time YouTube did not existed.

PS: although some years ago (around 20), I did some programing in Prolog, the language supposedly used, and this language was (at the time) used to make what was called "expert systems", programs that, with the right input, could reach some impressive conclusions, one of the most common examples was that game in which we have to find which animal the other person is thinking about just by making some questions.