This information comes from wiki. California has 163,696 sq mi of land. Iraq has 168,743 sq mi of land. Iraq is slightly larger than California.
Iraq has had around 130,000 US troops throughout the war.
Basically what I am saying is that 20,000 troops being prepared for something out of the ordinary is not that bad. You aren't going to see soldiers
at every intersection watching you. That is if we have soldier sitting on US streets. Most likely, it's not going to happen, for the reasons that
some of you have in your heads. I am betting that they just want to make it legal that in the event of an extreme case they will be able to send in a
unit from the regular Army.
Sure the lack the potential for individual care. There is still not replacement for the military when determining who is prepared to deal with an odd
situation. The Air Force can transport anywhere in the country. The Army has a base ready to go. The Navy can deal with anything happening on the
seas or near a coast. We have highly capable organizations that could act but wouldn't be able to because they can work within the US.
We our shooting ourselves in the foot by not allowing the military to act in a time of need. However, I understand where not letting allowing the
military to act within the US comes from. I don't believe military powers would be abused now. Most of our laws are written with good intentions.
It's not till years later when those intentions have been forgotten that these laws will be looked over for what we know was "loopholes"

