Here's my take on the interview:
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: What are the Free Masons?
A: The Free Masons are a botherhood of men whos goal is the betterment of man kind.
Well, we’re off to a good start. This is largely correct.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: How does the brotherhood expect to achive these goals?
A: By influancing goverment and private corperations.
Oh dear. This subscribes to the popular belief within conspiracy circles that Masonry has a “finger in every pie” and uses the position and
status of its individual members to effect changes in the world at large and directs things the way “Freemasonry” wants them to be directed. The
problem with this is that Freemasonry has decentralised leadership, which operates in an annually-cyclical manner. So, you never have the capacity
for ongoing dictatorial or tyrannical rule within Freemasonry, because the management keeps changing! I think that such a broadly-scope agenda as
“influencing government and private corporations” would require some kind of centralised leadership. Plus, the tenets of Freemasonry would need
to include something to this effect so that the members could work toward the goal. In reality, of course, it does not.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: Well How many countries do the brotherhood operate in?
A: All of them.
Well, this is preposterous. How could a fraternity with the (fictitious) stated means of “influencing government and corporations” operate in a
country like Somalia? And how could one “Mason” possibly know this to be a fact? Sounds to me like a sweeping statement for effect that was
either completely fabricated by the “interviewer”, or a tall tale by the “interviewee”.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: How is the mason organisation set up?
A: Well just like the trades there are laborers, apprentices, journeymen, and masters.
Actually, the 3 Blue Lodge degrees are Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master. The preceeding line of text was fabricated by someone who has a
limited (and erroneous) knowledge of the structure of Freemasonry. Another point which leads me to believe that this “interview” was either
completely fabricated, or the the “interviewee” was stringing the questioner on a line.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: So a level 32 mason would be a master?
A: No, that would make him a apprentise.
Again, completely false. A Mason who has obtained the 32nd degree in the Scottish Rite (an appendant body of Freemasonry) must have already obtained
the sublime (3rd) degree of Master Mason. Either the “interviewee” is a liar, speaking out of ignorance, or the “interviewer” is trying to
make us believe the old chestnut that the 33rd degree is only the beginning, and that there’s a whole world of Freemasonry beyond it (probably
involving Baphomet worship, Luciferianism or some other such nonsense).
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: Does the brotherhood of freemasons have any connection with the illuminati.
A: Yes.
I wouldn’t normally respond to this, but I think it’s important for people to know that the Illuminati as an organisation hasn’t existed since
the 18th century. There has been no reincarnation of Adam Weishaupt’s organisation in any meaningful sense. There have been many insignificant
claimants to the title, but nothing which can claim any real lineage. I challenge anyone to find any demonstrable evidence to the contrary (foregoing
the tired old “they’re secret, so there is no evidence” by-line, if you don’t mind.)
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: What !?
A: Well the Masons believe in balance so at the master level we are split up into two groups, the brotherhood of light (the illuminati) and the
brotherhood of darkness (the infusco). so by having a light and a dark we are a balanced organisation.
This seems completely made-up to me. The only remotely relevant reference to the Infusco that I could find on the internet is a mysterious webpage
with no links, no content, and no explanations as to it’s presence except for a creepy motto "Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow..... But soon."
The page, titled “Infusco – To Make Dark” can be found here:
www.infusco.net.... Sounds like childish conspiracy fodder to me,
or maybe a promo for some kind of net marketing campaign.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: What do the illuminati and the infusco do?
A: The current main goal of the illuminati is to esentially replace the current monetary system to a resource based economy, among other things. The
infusco controls knowledge.
So, the “Illuminati want to go back to a bartering economy? That seems pretty stupid given that they (allegedly) want to maintain control of
everything. A barter economy would dilute control, giving artificial power to primary producers. So, unless the Illuminati are all farmers, they’d
be screwed.
I must say that, based on the lack of content on their website, the Infusco are doing a splendid job of controlling “knowledge”, for there is
certainly none to be had there.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: I've never heard of the infusco.
A: Most people haven't
Maybe because they are made up? They certainly don’t feature in Regular Freemasonry.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: What knoledge do they control?
A: To much to mention.
How convenient. But sensible. Hell, if the “interviewee” gave out that meta-knowledge, then it wouldn’t be controlled, would it!
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: wow, so the masons have pretty much been controling the planet for the last hunderad years?
A: Not controling just giving a push in the right direction, there is a difference. and its more like the last three thousand.
Speculative Freemasonry is widely considered to have commenced around 1717. So this assertion is kind of impossible, unless you hold to the
ridiculous belief that stoneworking tradesmen have been influencing the world on a grand scale for the last 3000 years, which is just mindbuggeringly
stupid.
Originally posted by aginstitallQ: So is there any proof that i can give to people to confirm anything you have said?
A: Well no one book, but its all out there.
Of course. The ole “do the research” by-line.
To the Original Poster: I personally think you either just made this whole interview up OR you have a near-perfect memory and are monumental
gullible. The former is more likely in my mind.
