1) Why are their no airport security videos of any of the nineteen accused Muslims boarding any of the highjacked planes?

2) How could Mohammed Atta's passport survive the fireballs explosion that supposedly cremated him, fly out of his pocket, fly out of the incinerated plane, flutter to the ground in two feet of debris and end up in readable condition in the hands of investigators? (All within 48 hours)

3) Why did 19 Muslim men even need passports on domestic flights?

4) How were passports found but not the planes voice recorders?

5) Why did the highjack’s need passports they would never use again after their suicide flights?

6) Why were the 19 accused Muslims not under surveillance on 9/11, if they were so easy to identity?

7) How come right after the attacks, CNN deceptively and repeatedly showed an airport security video of Mohammed Atta? (CNN neglected to tell viewers that the video showed Mohammed Atta boarding a plane at Portland Maine – not the highjacked plane)

8) How come according to Japanese, Chinese and Indian new reports, Osama bin laden was killed in Afghanistan in the fall of 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave by his own men?

9) How come since 9/11 FBI director Muller, BBC news and ABC have confirmed that 7 of the 19 Muslims did not die in the 9/11 crashes?

10) How come one of the accused Muslims died a year before the 9/11 highjackings even occurred?

1)why is it that the twin towers did not collapse after the attack in Independence day, which destroyed the entire city?

2)and i think they were still there after the tsunami in The Day After Tomorrow

[edit on 8-1-2009 by tankthinker]

Originally posted by Griff

It's the infamous interview where he states the "meteorite" is "fused concrete and steel".

This again?

The second video starts out by saying that why hasn't it been analyzed...... so his opinion is just that - an opinion.

And, it's silver - aluminum perhaps?

And, it's not rusted. Do you have any idea how quick steel will rust after welding and/or being melted? Days. It was outside in the video. Exposed to the elements.

Plus, IF the concrete and steel were in liquid form, and then cooled to a solid.... do you have any evidence that it wouldn't separate as it cooled?

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
The reason that bin Laden's death (if he is really dead) has gone unreported in the west is because they may need to heap some more blame on him if they ever decide to do another so-called terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11.

Why wouldn't they just blame the new leader of Al-queda? Then they could also claim victory by saying that they killed Bin Laden. (These conspirators aren't too smart, are they?)

Originally posted by adam_zapple

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
The reason that bin Laden's death (if he is really dead) has gone unreported in the west is because they may need to heap some more blame on him if they ever decide to do another so-called terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11.

Why wouldn't they just blame the new leader of Al-queda? Then they could also claim victory by saying that they killed Bin Laden. (These conspirators aren't too smart, are they?)

They need that instantly recognisable face. With most people its not the organisation its the individual they react to. Thats why they need to keep this man alive and well, and keep up the pretence that he's hiding in the shadows preparing another 9/11.

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.

Originally posted by adam_zapple

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
The reason that bin Laden's death (if he is really dead) has gone unreported in the west is because they may need to heap some more blame on him if they ever decide to do another so-called terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11.

Why wouldn't they just blame the new leader of Al-queda? Then they could also claim victory by saying that they killed Bin Laden. (These conspirators aren't too smart, are they?)

They need that instantly recognisable face. With most people its not the organisation its the individual they react to. Thats why they need to keep this man alive and well, and keep up the pretence that he's hiding in the shadows preparing another 9/11.

They don't need a recognizeable face...they just need a guy in a turban vowing to kill Americans. OBL is recognizeable, but killing him off isn't going to make people think that Al-Queda is no longer a threat.

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
I don't agree with you at all. Terrorism is personal. If every single person doesn't believe that the terrorists are after them then the concept doesn't work. During the troubles in Ireland people weren't upset by organisations or paramilitary's they were upset by the appearance of Adams or Paisley etc, and what they stood for For terrorism to truly work you need to be able to put a face to the so-called terrorist organisation who is trying to kill you.

A face...."A face". The face can, and does, change. If, tomorrow, the military were to announce that they killed OBL, does that mean that people will stop fearing Al-Queda? No. They will stop fearing OBL, but it will only be a matter of time before another figurehead takes his place or another terrorist organization becomes a bigger threat and they'll have someone else to fear. The idea that OBL must be kept alive in order to have someone to blame for the next attack doesn't make sense when it could simply be blamed on his successor.

Let's say, hypothetically, I was running this conspiracy you believe exists....that OBL is fake, etc etc. I would announce tomorrow that we'd killed OBL (now we're heroes), and when we carried out our next attack, we would "discover" that it was the work of OBL's younger, even MORE evil replacement as head of al-queda. The "sheeple" all eat it up and now they're afraid of someone else...AND since we are now heroes for killing OBL guess what the people want...."Get the new guy now too". Hey...another excuse for war (that's what we want, right?) It's a win-win-win. It makes way more sense than continuing to blame every attack on an old guy who isn't going to be around much longer.

Originally posted by Griff

Now, can you really tell the difference between aluminum and steel with such a crappy photo? Unless you have a better quality pic?

Uhhh, yes! Can't you?

Granted, there isn't much detail to the pic, but I'm not id'ing it through some hi-res analysis.

It's silver. Aluminum is silver.

Rusted iron is.... rust color, LOL...

Do you have his email? I'll ask him if he did the simple thing and put a magnet to it.

Originally posted by Griff

Anyway, it is grey colored. The color of concrete.

Ahh, that makes sense then.

BTW, he says that they are fused by the heat. Being a prestigious FAIA member, I'm sure that if he saw it melted, then he would have said melted.

I'll ask him about that too. And I'll make sure that he knows that you, Jason Griffn, SE, might be misrepresenting his statement to mean that he saw melted steel, I'm sure he'll appreciate that.

That IS your point for showing this video, correct?

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Sorry Griff, I guess I a more complete answer would have been, I have yet to see any proof of pools of molten steel SEVEN weeks after 9/11.

Thank you. That makes more sense.

And I agree 100%