Mass confusion of Citizenship Rules: Obama is Legit, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 24 times


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 05:16 PM by its bologna
Originally posted by JohnnyR

If its already been "vetted" by thousands of professionals, then why is the SCOTUS looking at it?


Actually what was filed in the SCOTUS was a Petition for writ of certerori. The writ of certiorari has not yet been granted by the SCOTUS.

Some legal definitions can be found
here.

The petition of a writ of certiorari is a document which a losing party files with the Supreme Court asking the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower court. It includes a list of the parties, a statement of the facts of the case, the legal questions presented for review, and arguments as to why the Court should grant the writ.

I hope it's heard to put this bull to rest. More importantly, I hope that Berg gets a lot of media attention on how stupid his claim is.

If anyone has read what he filed with a court..available on his website obamacrimes.com, it is full of internet rumor. He cites sources of people's internet aliases such as "TechDude" and "reputable sites" like Wikipedia. Honestly, I can't see how anyone is taking this guy seriously. But if you want to hold on to hope that this will make the black guy go away..more power to you.

I just find it amusing, myself.





reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 07:04 PM by Kailassa
Originally posted by irishgrl
Its my understanding that Hawaii has rules of its own allowing a person to claim birth in Hawaii, even it actually born elsewhere, as long as certain conditions are met. to wit:

Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence.

Since Hawaii issues “Certificates of Live Birth” to children not born in Hawaii and “Birth Certificates” to children who are born in Hawaii, the only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.


however I also found this:

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;


If she gave birth to Obama at 16, and spent at least 5 years in the States, (2 after the age of 14) then she is a citizen, and so is her child, apparently, regardless of where he/she was born or the status of his/her legitimacy...If I understand this correctly...


1. It's not a "certificate of live birth" issued in this situation, it's an actual birth certificate. Both the birth certificate issued this way, and the certificate Obama has shown which is extracted from it, will be issued by Hawaii, but will show the actual place of birth.

So the fact that the certificate we have seen gives the place of birth as Hawaii is proof Obama was born in Hawaii.

[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.

(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.



2. As , unbeknown to Obama's mother, his father was still married when he married her, their marriage was not legal. Therefore different rules apply and Obama's mother only had to have been a US citizen and resided in America for one year to pass on US citizenship to her baby.

So Obama was born a US citizen, even if he was born on Krypton.

Justia> Law> US Law> US Code>
TITLE 8 — ALIENS AND NATIONALITY>
CHAPTER 12 — IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY>
SUBCHAPTER III — NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION>
PART I — NATIONALITY AT BIRTH AND COLLECTIVE NATURALIZATION> § 1409. —
Children born out of wedlock.

(c) Notwithstanding the provision of subsection (a) of this section, a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person's birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.


Besides, Obama's mother was nearly 18 when she had him, not 16.

Mod Edit: Fixed quote tags.

[edit on 2-12-2008 by GAOTU789]



reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 08:27 PM by irishgrl
Originally posted by its bologna
Originally posted by JohnnyR

If its already been "vetted" by thousands of professionals, then why is the SCOTUS looking at it?


Actually what was filed in the SCOTUS was a Petition for writ of certerori. The writ of certiorari has not yet been granted by the SCOTUS.

Some legal definitions can be found
here.

The petition of a writ of certiorari is a document which a losing party files with the Supreme Court asking the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower court. It includes a list of the parties, a statement of the facts of the case, the legal questions presented for review, and arguments as to why the Court should grant the writ.

I hope it's heard to put this bull to rest. More importantly, I hope that Berg gets a lot of media attention on how stupid his claim is.

If anyone has read what he filed with a court..available on his website obamacrimes.com, it is full of internet rumor. He cites sources of people's internet aliases such as "TechDude" and "reputable sites" like Wikipedia. Honestly, I can't see how anyone is taking this guy seriously. But if you want to hold on to hope that this will make the black guy go away..more power to you.

I just find it amusing, myself.



I cannot say whether Berg's writ was granted or not but I CAN say that the COURT (as in the US SUPREME CT) gave Obama until 12/1/09 to respond to Berg's motion, and as far as I know, Obama has not done so. This basically amounts (in legal procedure) to an admission. So, folks can throw around Constitutional phrasing, or legal precedent all they want to, but if Obama isnt complying with a Supreme Ct order, then he is hoisting his own petard IMO. NUFF SAID.

[edit on 12/2/08 by irishgrl]


reply posted on 2-12-2008 @ 09:16 PM by danx
Originally posted by irishgrl
Ive heard that argument before, however I think this issue has legs and I think Obama will have to PROVE his legitimacy. whether or not you or I agree.


Section 401 of the Nationality Act of 1940 (the same Act Berg cites as basis for his argument):
A person who is a national of the United States, whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by:
(a) Obtaining naturalization in a foreign state, either upon his own application or through the naturalization of a parent having legal custody of such person: Provided, however, That nationality not be lost as the result of the naturalization of a parent unless and until the child shall have attained the age of twenty-three years without acquiring permanent residence in the United States



That doesnt detract from the fact that I want him to win LEGITIMATELY. As in WITHOUT DOUBT. As in, WITH COURT APPROVAL.


I'm in complete agreement with you. And as far as I can tell, all the laws seem to support the idea that he is a "natural born" citizen and never lost his citizenship (provided that he indeed was born in Hawaii).




[edit on 2-12-2008 by danx]


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 01:30 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by TKainZero
Reguardless of where Obama was born, when he was adopted by his mothers second husband, he lost his US Natural Born Citizenship.

No.

1. Adoption has no relevance to citizenship.
2. You do not lose American citizenship by gaining citizenship of another country.
3. You cannot even give up American citizenship before you are 18.
4. If you are coerced into giving up American citizenship, you are deemed by American law to have not given it up. Even for an adult, it must be completely voluntary.
5. Nothing your parents can do can deprive you of your American citizenship.

I must say, btw, that America, through her citizenship laws, takes about the best care of her citizens of any country on Earth. You guys should be proud.

IMHO, the best case the Obama can make, is that he was born in Hawaii, and when he moved to the Far East with Stanly's second husband, he was an illigal alien there, and would be an criminal in THAT country...

And that his American ID was still clean...

That way he would just be an international criminal, that would be another countries responsiblity, rather then an illigal alien, from a foriegn nation in the USA...

OMG! This is just rabid absurdity!
You don't become an illegal alien or an international criminal by living in another country for four years!

Obama was taken to Indonesia legally.
He lived there, from the age of 6 to the age of 10, under his stepfather's name.
At the age of 10 Obama returned to Hawaii as a legal American resident, with his mother.
When Obama's mother returned to continue her work with the Indonesians she was helping, Obama chose to remain in Hawaii, living with his maternal grandparents while continuing his schooling at regular American schools.


reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 02:00 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by bosco8161
reply to
post by Kailassa


Per your request from Article 2 of the United States Constitution.
. . . . . . . .

See also: natural-born citizen and President of the United States
By the time of their inauguration, the President and Vice President must be:

natural born citizens (or citizens at the time of the Constitution's adoption)
at least thirty-five years old
inhabitants for at least fourteen years of the United States.
. . . . . . . .

Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both citizens of the U.S.) may be president of the United States,
. . . . . . . .

PLEASE, next time pay attention to your American Government Class.

And again, I'm not saying he's not an American Citizen, but if he is not the rule of law applies.

Well duh, of course the rule of law applies ...

I know the constitution all right, and NOWHERE does the constitution say:
"Only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both citizens of the U.S.) may be president of the United States,"

The constitution does say the president must be a natural born citizen of America. However "natural born" in this context has never been officially defined. It is not defined in the constitution. It is not defined in American law.

The most common definition of natural born is having been born on the soil of the country concerned. Being born to two American citizens outside America has never been an accepted definition.

I would not be surprised if the Supreme Court uses this opportunity to formally define natural born at last. On the other hand they might prefer to leave the definition flexible so as to not exclude any good, obviously patriotic citizen from being president in the future.



reply posted on 3-12-2008 @ 02:26 AM by Kailassa
Originally posted by TKainZero
One could not attend schools in indonesia, UNLESS they were an indonesian citizen...

Despite this allegation being frequently repeated, no-one has ever shown an iota of proof to support it.

And, you COULD NOT BE AN INDONEASIAN citizen, IF you had any other citezenship...
It is true that accepting Indonesian citizenship means renouncing American citizenship. However this renunciation only means Indonesia no longer acknowledges your other citizenship. American law does not recognise the renunciation of citizenship by a child under 18 or by anyone under duress.

So... either BO gave up his citizenship, when his mother 2nd husband adopted him...
Adoption by a foreign national is irrelevant to one's American citizenship.

OR, he was an illigal alien living under a false name in Indonesia...
Obama entered Indonesia legally and lived their legally.

Obama did not live in Indonesia long enough to qualify to take on Indonesian citizenship.
Obama did not live under a false name. He took his stepfather's name as children often do.

His best case to make is that he broke no US laws... but only Indoneasian Law...
So, he IS an international Criminal, wanted in Indonesia...

More rabid insanity ...
You have not shown that Obama has ever broken a law anywhere.
Which, under the circumstances, is hardly surprising.

unless of course he is not there, which would likely make him an illigal alien in the USA...
We will see how powerful BO has become...
Can he supercede the Law with the Clinton Media Machine behind him???
He has so far....and only time will tell

Actually Obama is a scaley green reptilian who is going to climb in through your window tonight, suck out your soul and enslave you forever.
I know he is because no-one has ever proved to me he isn't.

[edit on 3/12/08 by Kailassa]

[edit on 3/12/08 by Kailassa]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies