Originally posted by jakyll
They are also to be used against suspected terrorists.How many British men who were sent to Guantanamo Bay have now been found innocent?
Which had fudge all to do with the British Government. What's your point?
Originally posted by jakyll
Er,they're not destroyed.This is one of the biggest arguments against the taking of DNA samples.Innocent or guilty,all samples go onto the NDNAD,the
UK’s National DNA Database.
Oh well, it used to be the case they were destroyed. Just make sure you don't go on a raping binge, hey? Whats the big deal? And what rights have
been infringed?
Originally posted by jakyll
Yes they do.
And why tell you what i think when i can tell you what i know.
What rights have been taken away? I'll ask for a third time as you are trying to avoid the question. If you're going to bitch about it, spit it out.
I think you don't want to say because you are not certain on what rights you had in the first place. You are just parroting what you've heard,
aren't you?
I'll give you a clue. The detention Law could be seen as removing your right of Habeous Corpus, but seeing as it is subject to Judicial review
pending ongoing investigations, it can be argued that it doesn't actually infringe this right.
That's not to say I approve of it, but I can see why they do it.
28 days is the maximum length of time you can be held, without charge. If the Police had nothing on you, then you would be released fairly quickly as
the judge would order it, if you are held for that long the chances are that you had something to do with terrorism, so can't really whine about
it.
That is the only right that is even challenged by the above examples you provided and even then, it is tenuous.
[edit on 29/11/08 by stumason]
