the reason I fear the God of the bible: science, page 23


Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24    25    26  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 08:05 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by spy66


Then i say!!! who will SQUASH what. What source will do what you say here. It won't happen on it's own will it?
That's impossible.


How do you know it's impossible? Are you a quantum astrophysicist? You said earlier that it's impossible for something to come nothing, yet physicists know that atoms can 'appear' in a vacuum which is something from nothing.

The singularity was all matter-energy in the universe condensed into a point, but more importantly all of space-time and all the other dimensions as condensed in there as well. If it's possible for atoms to appear from nothing in space, then you condense all space into a point and continue to spawn atoms inside that point, then of course it's going to produce a rapid expansion (big-bang) without a creator.

Have can time create it self?


"How?" When a singularity expands into an area with no dimensions, time begins. It's source IS the singularity.

Have can Matter create it self?


If you have space-time (or an area with dimensions) matter will self generate.

What could make energy if it is Eternal or infinite!


This is the same argument you use to support God. "Perhaps it exists outside of time and has no begining or end." You run into the same problems that matter and energy does.

[edit on 19/12/2008 by Good Wolf]



reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 08:13 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by Grandma



You say that "hell" is a myth. Then why worry about it. If it is not real, then nothing else matters anyway, right. Why, keep on debating the fact if God exists or not. If hell is a myth, then you will not be punished. Or is there a small part of you that is not all that sure, just maybe, thses Jesus people are right. Then "what if?"


More REAL things matter like social obligation, consequences of law and the greatest of all, the moral and categorical imperative.

Merry Christmas (you do believe in Christmas don't you?)


You mean the pagan winter solstice that the christians hijacked? You mean that one? Yea I believe in it.


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 08:19 PM by Grandma
reply to post by Good Wolf



Good Wolf:

I must see from your posts that other things must not matter all that much. You always seem ready to bash God in every thread you can.

Again, I say to you, if you really do not believe, then it really should not be of importance to you what Christians do believe. If we believe in a myth, so be it, it is our choice as it is yours not to. BUT ONE OF US IS RIGHT!

So, again, it comes down to the "what if" game.

I do wish you a Merry Christmas


Peace,
Grandma


reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 08:24 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by Grandma


Good Wolf:

I must see from your posts that other things must not matter all that much. You always seem ready to bash God in every thread you can.


Hardly. Just those that actually have something to do with faith, and even then I'm not bashing God, I don't believe he exists. I criticise the belief in God.

Again, I say to you, if you really do not believe, then it really should not be of importance to you what Christians do believe. If we believe in a myth, so be it, it is our choice as it is yours not to. BUT ONE OF US IS RIGHT!

So, again, it comes down to the "what if" game.


I thoroughly enjoy debating this stuff is all. Throughing logic and at a belief that works on no evidence (look up the definition of the word faith) is funny some times.

"One us is right!"

Really? Neither of us could be right you know. But if we are here to work out which is right, it's pretty silly to just "believe" without evidence in something, as opposed to using the scientific method to decern facts from belief.

[edit on 19/12/2008 by Good Wolf]


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 07:56 AM by Annon Omas
reply to post by Good Wolf





Hardly. Just those that actually have something to do with faith, and even then I'm not bashing God,


Why bash anybody ? Does it make you feel better ? You know whats said about people who ridicule others don't you ?



I don't believe he exists.


Prove he doesn't



I criticise the belief in God.


People criticise what they don't understand



I thoroughly enjoy debating this stuff is all.


No.....you enjoy thinking your right, which is questionable at best.



Throughing logic and at a belief that works on no evidence (look up the definition of the word faith) is funny some times.


Making fun of people's of faith again ?



Really? Neither of us could be right you know.


Grandma could be right, you know



But if we are here to work out which is right, it's pretty silly to just "believe" without evidence in something, as opposed to using the scientific method to decern facts from belief.


Evidence is evidence, nothing more. Evidence is not conclusive. Evidence is not fact


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 01:24 PM by Grandma
reply to post by TruthParadox



You failed to answer:

BUT ONE OF US US RIGHT

Debate that for a while


Peace
Grandma

Merry Christmas!!!!


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 01:26 PM by Grandma
reply to post by Annon Omas



Annon Omas:

Thank you for your support with my post to Good Wolf. I appreciate it very much. I hope you have a MERRY CHRISTMAS!




Peace
Grandma


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 01:47 PM by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Grandma



Tell me, how does one debate such a thing....

BUT ONE OF US IS RIGHT

Can you prove that you are right?

LV



reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 02:08 PM by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Annon Omas




Hello Annon Omas,


I would like to quote something you said in reply to Good Wolf.

"No.....you enjoy thinking your right, which is questionable at best."

How is his sharing his thoughts on the matter any different then a religious believer sharing what they think is right also. How is what Grandma says and what Good Wolf says...any different from each other. Arent they both thinking they are right? Are you not choosing a side, by stating that it is only Good wolf who is here because he gets kicks out of thinking he is right...and that Grandma is more right because you side with her thinking?



Just thoughts,
LV


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 03:40 PM by Grandma
reply to post by TruthParadox



TruthParadox:

My way: the love of God
the fellowship with God
hope in eternal life


Your way: the love of man
the fellowship with yourself
no hope of eternal savation


I think I like my way better



Peace,
Grandma


reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 10:11 PM by Good Wolf
reply to post by Grandma



Haha, stoped by TP. His post demostrates that what you said is only correct on a single assumption, and nothing else, that you are right. It has no merit and as such, is ultimately pointless.

Whats more is that your making it seem that God is real and is obvious os we must be not believing in him because we don't like him for some reason. I and others have explained that we'd be happier if we bought it. It's a more comfortable idea and would love for it to be true but the evidence (mainly the bible) and all that doesn't have what is needed for us. At this time if we were to believe with whats there now, we would feel that we are deceiving ourselves.

[edit on 20/12/2008 by Good Wolf]
Pages: <<  20    21    22    23    24    25    26  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags