Originally posted by cognoscente
This is exactly the kind of respondent, improvident politics we get for maintaining a parliamentary democracy. The Conservatives make one announcement
regarding a plan to cut party funding for "economic" reasons (which by the way I don't agree with, Canada is doing absolutely amazing and there is
no indication our economy will suffer in the slightest for the entirety of this so-called global recession-our political leaders aren't helping my
spreading all this gloom and doom), and the other three parties decide to team up and take the House down. The issue is this new arrangement would
bankrupt the other parties, as the Conservatives have been stockpiling most income from this $1.95/vote government funding plan, having had the most
votes for such a long time. Sure, it's fair enough to say that the reaction by the NDP, Liberals and Bloc would have been expected by anyone in that
position. However, in the end this announcement is exactly what they've been waiting for. It's a perfect opportunity to usurp power, and now they
have the means (this media portrayed Conservative arrogance) to justify it. It's not justifiable. It's bullying, and now they're convincing
everyone the Conservatives are using this plan to secure power for themselves, as if they're some fascist state party. Ridiculous if you ask me. Too
bad the average Canadian is both poor, socialist and liberal. The public will eat this right up.
This type of party collusion should be illegal. If you form a party, you shouldn't be allowed to make cross-party allegiances. Otherwise, we end up
with a government that does not realistically correspond to the votes that the people initially provided to allow those parties into office. It's
absurd. You should see the Parliament in action. It's like a board of governors meeting for some Fortune 500 corporation. That's not Democracy.
First, paragraphs are your friend.
I don't think you've thought this through. There's nothing wrong with the parliamentary system, if anything, this is a demonstration of one of
it's strengths; a party that makes poor decisions, that the
majority of the house disagrees with, it doesn't stand. No one party can rule
over all, passing laws and bills as they see fit without going through the proper checks and balances.
If Bush was in constant fear of getting removed from office, do you think he would have done 1/10th of what he has in the interest of his own party?
No. He would've been removed long ago if he was our PM.
The key to staying in power for long periods in Canada, like Chretien, is quite simple; govern to the center. No one really thinks Chretien was a
GREAT PM, he didn't do anything astounding, at all, but he also didn't do anything that really outraged the public on either side of the spectrum.
He was a "good" PM, he basically kept the status quo, did his job and kept everyone
moderately happy.
You make it sound like at any moment there could be an uprising by a random coalition of idiots in the house and we could have a government comprising
of the Marxist party, Work-Less party and the Marijuana party; it doesn't work that way, it's not that easy.
The Conservatives barely formed a minority government and when you're a tiny minority, you have to do a damn good job to keep the majority happy or
guess what? The majority, represented by the majority of voters in Canada, will take back the house, surprise!
The Liberals and NDP forming a majority is no different than the existing Liberals in America. All the Liberal party is in America is, is a giant
coalition of all the past left-of-center parties coming together to combine voting power. When you do that, you end up with the same problems as
they're currently experiencing where the media doesn't pay attention to 3rd parties and you get stuck with an eternal coalition of right and left of
center parties.
I'd rather hear all the individual voices and give everyone a fair chance at being heard. Then, once the dust settles, if two parties want to come
together and form a majority, represented by a greater number of Canadian voters; I see no problem in that. How could you...
Originally posted by Dulcimer
Canada should have elections every 2 weeks. Thats a spicy meatball. I hate my country and want it to be nuked.
Just invade us. Get it over with. I want to be liberated.
Get the damn french labels off my products. Canada is a spineless nation with no gobberment at all. They wonder why nobody votes.
Leave.
Spineless? Why? Because we don't preemptively invade other nations for oil?
Because
Harper has been in bed with Bush since he got in office? Well you're in luck there! That can be fixed!
France played a large role in our founding, in fact gave us the name Canada AKA "New France", which was later ceded to Great Briton and formed
Quebec; go to school.