Breaking News: Canadian Government to Fall, Liberal and NDP Parties Negotiating Coalition Government, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 08:51 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by matth



I don't see what this has to do with the Canadian Government "falling...."


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 09:49 PM by DarrylGalasso
reply to post by matth



Wow! I cannot believe anyone would even support this. Do you not realize the implications of this????? You my Canadian friend, have just lost your right to choose. Almost sounds fascist to me. Why not just have a dictator? Sure they are going to sugar coat it for you now, come back on here and tell us what you think of it in 3 years. Canada has just become a one party dictatorship, I certainly hope that the American people are not stupid enough to allow this to happen here, although I am sure they are more than stupid enough and with the right spin, they could sell you anything. Just more evidence for what I have said all along; A person is smart, put them into a group and their intellect dissipates exponentially.



reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 10:26 PM by GAOTU789
I don't know if I am comfortable with this.

Don't get me wrong, I am no fan of the Alliance/Conservative Party but they won the election. It isn`t there fault that Canada has grown so apathetic toward politics that less than 60% of us actually voted. Well, it's every parties fault but thats a different topic. This back door way around a democratically elected Government doesn't sit right with me.

How many pie in the sky ideas is Layton going to try and get passed for supporting this.

I hope this doesn't mean that

-Dion stays on as leader longer than planned. I fear he could be bullied into all kinds of crazy ideas.

-The Bloc is going to be running things behind the scenes as the deciding votes.

-The infrastructure investments needed in this country aren't delayed any further.

Harper pushed too far this time. The idea mentioned earlier that he may have designed this to get out of Dodge is in interesting one though. His GST cuts where widely criticized in financial circles as a bad move. Roughly 13 Billion dollars permanently removed from the Government coffers. Coupled with the corporate cuts also, it's easy to see why we are going back to running fiscal deficits.

I'm surprised to see little mention of fire sale of Government assets planned also in this update not talked about more. If I understand Flaherty correctly, they want to offload a lot of property and start pushing the P3 model of operation.

This weekend will be an interesting one for sure.


reply posted on 29-11-2008 @ 12:37 AM by matth
reply to post by DarrylGalasso



I understand the point you are trying to make, however what people need to remember here is that although the Conservatives won the most seats out of the other political parties, they did not win the majority of votes in the election.

In reality, the Conservatives only received 37% of the votes 6 weeks ago. The majority of Canadians did NOT vote the Conservatives in, and when you combine the 26% of Canadians who voted Liberal, combined with the 18% of Canadians who voted NDP and the 9% of Quebecers who voted for the Bloc, you will have a coalition government consisting of a democratically elected majority, only consisting of various political parties.

I mean, when people voted for the Liberals and NDP 6 weeks ago, they weren't voting them in to be the Opposition, they voted for them with the intention for their party to be in power. Now at least the people the majority of Canadians voted for 6 weeks ago will have the chance to make some things happen in Ottawa for the betterment of our country. So don't let the Conservatives trick you into thinking that this coalition government is anti-democratic and not chosen by the people, when in fact it is the exact opposite.

The Conservative's "divide and conquer" mentality to keep the Opposition parties divided has backfired this time, and the fact that the Opposition parties are still willing to bring down the government even AFTER Harper brought back the public funding for political parties, shows that this coalition will have the best interests of Canadians at heart. Don't let then manipulate you into thinking this possible coalition is changing the result of the election, because in the end this coalition would become a majority government, because every single one of those seats were voted by Canadians.


reply posted on 29-11-2008 @ 12:46 AM by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by matth
reply to
post by DarrylGalasso



I understand the point you are trying to make, however what people need to remember here is that although the Conservatives won the most seats out of the other political parties, they did not win the majority of votes in the election.

In reality, the Conservatives only received 37% of the votes 6 weeks ago. The majority of Canadians did NOT vote the Conservatives in, and when you combine the 26% of Canadians who voted Liberal, combined with the 18% of Canadians who voted NDP and the 9% of Quebecers who voted for the Bloc, you will have a coalition government consisting of a democratically elected majority, only consisting of various political parties.

I mean, when people voted for the Liberals and NDP 6 weeks ago, they weren't voting them in to be the Opposition, they voted for them with the intention for their party to be in power. Now at least the people the majority of Canadians voted for 6 weeks ago will have the chance to make some things happen in Ottawa for the betterment of our country. So don't let the Conservatives trick you into thinking that this coalition government is anti-democratic and not chosen by the people, when in fact it is the exact opposite.

The Conservative's "divide and conquer" mentality to keep the Opposition parties divided has backfired this time, and the fact that the Opposition parties are still willing to bring down the government even AFTER Harper brought back the public funding for political parties, shows that this coalition will have the best interests of Canadians at heart. Don't let then manipulate you into thinking this possible coalition is changing the result of the election, because in the end this coalition would become a majority government, because every single one of those seats were voted by Canadians.


Exactly.

Finally we get what we voted for: Anyone but Harper


reply posted on 29-11-2008 @ 02:12 AM by cognoscente
This is exactly the kind of respondent, improvident politics we get for maintaining a parliamentary democracy. The Conservatives make one announcement regarding a plan to cut party funding for "economic" reasons (which by the way I don't agree with, Canada is doing absolutely amazing and there is no indication our economy will suffer in the slightest for the entirety of this so-called global recession-our political leaders really aren't helping by so liberally spreading this message of gloom and doom), and the other three parties decide to team up and take the House down. The issue is this new arrangement would bankrupt the other parties, as the Conservatives have the largest stockpile of income from this $1.95/vote government funding plan, having had the most votes for such a long time. Sure, it's fair enough to say that the reaction by the NDP, Liberals and Bloc would have been expected by anyone in that position. However, in the end this announcement is exactly what they've been waiting for. It's a perfect opportunity to usurp power, and now they have the means (this media portrayed Conservative arrogance) to justify it. It's not justifiable. It's bullying, and now they're convincing everyone the Conservatives are using this plan to secure power for themselves, as if they're some fascist state party. The Conservatives aren't so desperate they would be willing to pull off something so apparently underhanded. Too bad the average Canadian is a socialist, liberal pinko. The public will eat this right up.

This type of party collusion should be illegal. If you form a party, you shouldn't be allowed to make cross-party allegiances. Otherwise, we end up with a government that does not realistically correspond to the votes that the people initially provided to allow those parties into office. It's absurd. Honestly, you should see Parliament in action. Watching C-Span makes Congress look like a Catholic school girl (yeah, full metaphor intended ) in comparison to our so-called "dignified British-inspired government".

Originally posted by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by matth
reply to
post by DarrylGalasso


The Conservative's "divide and conquer" mentality to keep the Opposition parties divided has backfired this time, and the fact that the Opposition parties are still willing to bring down the government even AFTER Harper brought back the public funding for political parties, shows that this coalition will have the best interests of Canadians at heart. Don't let then manipulate you into thinking this possible coalition is changing the result of the election, because in the end this coalition would become a majority government, because every single one of those seats were voted by Canadians.


Exactly.

Finally we get what we voted for: Anyone but Harper


Oh, get over yourself already. The party with the most seats gets in and they deserve it above all else. The "majority" as you call it is divided and they don't know what they want. It's more democratic to have a minority government in power, which is supported by the largest rational population as opposed to having a "coalition" or should I say a collusion of interested parties that is incapable of producing any popular solidarity, unless of course they form a "coalition". Not only does that say something about their credibility, it says even more about their lack of competence. This new coalition isn't representative of the people. It's a brand new interest. How about we hold another election. Let's see if this Coalition makes it in then. If it does then democracy has failed in this country, and what we end up with is an oligarchy of the masses.

It's not about "the majority", it's about a "conscientious community". If that community happens to be a majority then we as a Democratic nation have succeeded. It's not as simple as adding up all the different parties that have failed to gain popular support and saying this new interest is the only way to go. People voted for either the NDP or Liberals for different reasons. That's why we have a vote. What a coalition does is essentially diminish the significance of each additional vote for every citizen in the country. What's truly sad is that people are willing to relinquish their public duty and their dignity for some type of ridiculous compromise. That's truly sad.

[edit on 29-11-2008 by cognoscente]



reply posted on 29-11-2008 @ 02:48 AM by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by cognoscente
This is exactly the kind of respondent, improvident politics we get for maintaining a parliamentary democracy. The Conservatives make one announcement regarding a plan to cut party funding for "economic" reasons (which by the way I don't agree with, Canada is doing absolutely amazing and there is no indication our economy will suffer in the slightest for the entirety of this so-called global recession-our political leaders aren't helping my spreading all this gloom and doom), and the other three parties decide to team up and take the House down. The issue is this new arrangement would bankrupt the other parties, as the Conservatives have been stockpiling most income from this $1.95/vote government funding plan, having had the most votes for such a long time. Sure, it's fair enough to say that the reaction by the NDP, Liberals and Bloc would have been expected by anyone in that position. However, in the end this announcement is exactly what they've been waiting for. It's a perfect opportunity to usurp power, and now they have the means (this media portrayed Conservative arrogance) to justify it. It's not justifiable. It's bullying, and now they're convincing everyone the Conservatives are using this plan to secure power for themselves, as if they're some fascist state party. Ridiculous if you ask me. Too bad the average Canadian is both poor, socialist and liberal. The public will eat this right up.

This type of party collusion should be illegal. If you form a party, you shouldn't be allowed to make cross-party allegiances. Otherwise, we end up with a government that does not realistically correspond to the votes that the people initially provided to allow those parties into office. It's absurd. You should see the Parliament in action. It's like a board of governors meeting for some Fortune 500 corporation. That's not Democracy.


First, paragraphs are your friend.

I don't think you've thought this through. There's nothing wrong with the parliamentary system, if anything, this is a demonstration of one of it's strengths; a party that makes poor decisions, that the majority of the house disagrees with, it doesn't stand. No one party can rule over all, passing laws and bills as they see fit without going through the proper checks and balances.

If Bush was in constant fear of getting removed from office, do you think he would have done 1/10th of what he has in the interest of his own party? No. He would've been removed long ago if he was our PM.

The key to staying in power for long periods in Canada, like Chretien, is quite simple; govern to the center. No one really thinks Chretien was a GREAT PM, he didn't do anything astounding, at all, but he also didn't do anything that really outraged the public on either side of the spectrum. He was a "good" PM, he basically kept the status quo, did his job and kept everyone moderately happy.

You make it sound like at any moment there could be an uprising by a random coalition of idiots in the house and we could have a government comprising of the Marxist party, Work-Less party and the Marijuana party; it doesn't work that way, it's not that easy.

The Conservatives barely formed a minority government and when you're a tiny minority, you have to do a damn good job to keep the majority happy or guess what? The majority, represented by the majority of voters in Canada, will take back the house, surprise!

The Liberals and NDP forming a majority is no different than the existing Liberals in America. All the Liberal party is in America is, is a giant coalition of all the past left-of-center parties coming together to combine voting power. When you do that, you end up with the same problems as they're currently experiencing where the media doesn't pay attention to 3rd parties and you get stuck with an eternal coalition of right and left of center parties.

I'd rather hear all the individual voices and give everyone a fair chance at being heard. Then, once the dust settles, if two parties want to come together and form a majority, represented by a greater number of Canadian voters; I see no problem in that. How could you...

Originally posted by Dulcimer
Canada should have elections every 2 weeks. Thats a spicy meatball. I hate my country and want it to be nuked.

Just invade us. Get it over with. I want to be liberated.

Get the damn french labels off my products. Canada is a spineless nation with no gobberment at all. They wonder why nobody votes.


Leave.

Spineless? Why? Because we don't preemptively invade other nations for oil?

Because Harper has been in bed with Bush since he got in office? Well you're in luck there! That can be fixed!

France played a large role in our founding, in fact gave us the name Canada AKA "New France", which was later ceded to Great Briton and formed Quebec; go to school.


reply posted on 29-11-2008 @ 07:57 AM by Max_TO
Please forgive me if this a was already brought up in an earlier post , how does the fact that the liberal party leader is a lame duck factor into this ? When are the liberals do to hold there party leadership convention ?
I am sorry but I don't see this happening the NDP would want more then there fair share of power in any such government , the liberals would be to political do to the fact that they are to have a leadership convention very soon and how could the liberals make any deal that would depend on the backing of the Bloc ? What price would they have to pay for such support ?
The reason Canada has had minority governments for the last few elections is that the Canadian people are simply not happy with the choices that they are presented with .
In Canada the politicians think that the term bi partisan is a reference to a sex act .
There is no real difference between any of the parties all you need to do is look into how often these jokers will flip flop between the other parties . This flip flopping of parties is not limited to the back benchers either , there are many party members who held key portfolios , ran for there respective party leaderships who have crossed party lines to join the other side of the political coin when it seemed to suit them best .
Come on people wake up and stop believing that some politician will save us . They are all cut from the same cloth and they all practice the same dirty tricks and use smoke and mirrors to keep the publics eyes away from the real issues . Please don't take my word for it check it out for yourself
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^