Riddle of the missing hydrogen, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 11:04 PM by majestictwo
reply to post by CosmicEgg



Your point is taken and thanks or the input, but try not to so angry about it because thats how it come across to me.



reply posted on 27-11-2008 @ 11:52 PM by TheStev
reply to post by CosmicEgg



While I agree with your general principal, I definitely disagree with your way of communicating this principal (it really does come across very hostile)

But beyond that, the OP and the article posted by the OP makes no reference to 'intelligent' life. So I don't really know what spurred that whole outburst, but it certainly shouldn't be in this thread.


reply posted on 28-11-2008 @ 03:51 AM by majestictwo
reply to post by TheStev



Now I’m no astronomer or even amateur star gazer. I was however struck with this finding that there was no hydrogen which means (I figured nothing). Reading again I understand that it’s likely there are more stars and that means more galaxies and I suppose more solar systems. Is this the correct?
So apologies I should have been a little more explicit in my OP.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^