posted on Nov, 28 2008 @ 04:19 AM
reply to post by Phage
- "The first set of geoengineering options screens incoming solar radiation with dust or soot in orbit about the earth or in the atmosphere. The
second set changes cloud abundance by increasing cloud condensation nuclei through carefully controlled emissions of particulate matter."
forward: For the past few years investigators and researchers have been searching for hard evidence on the elusive phenomena of chemtrail spraying. If
one searches GoogleNews for articles on chemtrails in (with 4500 periodicals represented) not one article will be found. There is simply no coverage
on this topic in the mainstream media.
Imagine our surprise when we discovered extensive proof of government involvement, funding, sponsorship, multidisciplinary research, policy making and
implementation of global atmospheric modification under the classification of 'Geoengineering.' This is the chemtrail smoking gun we have been
The following excerpts detail the preferred geoengineering Mitigations for reducing greenhouse gasses, global warming and radiation from space.
Quoted from: Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base - Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse
Authorized by Congress and sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, a monumental and in-depth study on global warming and possible corrective
measures (mitigations) was undertaken in the early 1990s. Represented were senior researchers, faculty, theoreticians, atmospheric scientists,
department heads and CEO's from a multitude of prestigious institutions. The Smithsonian, Harvard, General Motors, Cambridge, MIT, Yale, World
Resources Institute, National Center for Atmospheric Research, the Secretary General of the United Nations, Oxford, Brookings Institution, Columbia
University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carnegie-Mellon University, Princeton University, Brown University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, and many
more. This colossal study recalls the scope, expense and secrecy of the Manhattan Project, yet the goals and eventual impacts of it are far
"The first set of geoengineering options screens incoming solar radiation with dust or soot in orbit about the earth or in the atmosphere. The second
set changes cloud abundance by increasing cloud condensation nuclei through carefully controlled emissions of particulate matter."
"Aircraft Exhaust Penner et al. (1984) suggested that emissions of 1 percent of the fuel mass of the commercial aviation fleet as particulates,
between 40,000- and 100,000-foot (12- to 30-km) altitude for a 10-year period, would change the planetary albedo sufficiently to neutralize the
effects of an equivalent doubling of CO2. They proposed that retuning the engine combustion systems to burn rich during the high-altitude portion of
commercial flights could be done with negligible efficiency loss. Using Reck's estimates of extinction coefficients for particulates (Reck, 1979a,
1984), they estimated a requirement of about 1.168 ¥ 1010 kg of particulates, compared with the panel's estimate of 1010 kg, based upon Ramaswamy
and Kiehl (1985). They then estimated that if 1 percent of the fuel of aircraft flying above 30,000 feet is emitted as soot, over a 10-year period the
required mass of particulate material would be emitted.
"An alternate possibility is simply to lease commercial aircraft to carry dust to their maximum flight altitude, where they would distribute it. To
make a cost estimate, a simple assumption is made that the same amount of dust assumed above for the stratosphere would work for the tropopause (the
boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere). The results can be scaled for other amounts. The comments made above about the possible effect
of dust on stratospheric ozone apply as well to ozone in the low stratosphere, but not in the troposphere. The altitude of the tropopause varies with
latitude and season of the year."
"Sunlight screening systems would not have to be put into practice until shortly before they were needed for mitigation, although research to
understand their effects, as well as design and engineering work, should be done now so that it will be known whether these technologies are available
"Perhaps one of the surprises of this analysis is the relatively low costs at which some of the geoengineering options might be
Ok It's all quoted from the site i know but it's for people who don't bother to look at the link and also theres the...
"Following is a partial list of those involved in this monumental study:"
So you can go to the webpage and browse over the credible people and universities involved etc etc etc.????
So what's up Doc, care to explain your position on this site and its conclusions OP?
How come you've avoided it? seems to credible or against your bias?
I may be coming off smug but it's you guys who have been belittling us and calling us crazies or wacked out unfounded
Also NWO dave420 is a term the politicians have been tossing around for a long time not ours get it straight, don't lump them in with david icke/
reptillians/.......the New world order.....lol ya no politicians ever mentioned that before.......I suggest you to read some speeches while you 420
[edit on 28-11-2008 by GodshipForAll]