It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From listening to today’s right wing conservatives and the blathering talking heads of our corporate news media you’d expect catastrophic consequences to our economy from any attempt to increase taxes on the wealthy, even to the relatively moderate levels that existed just prior to the Bush II presidency. From these warnings you would think that the extremely high rates of taxation on the wealthy beginning with FDR’s presidency and lasting for half a century would have ruined our economy for many years to come...
...In any event, the high top marginal tax rates continued for several decades after FDR died, at 70% or more (far higher than what Obama is proposing increasing it to), until the Reagan Presidency starting in 1981. This chart shows median family income levels, beginning in 1947. With the top marginal tax rate approaching 90% at this time, median family income rose steadily (in 2005 dollars) from $22,499 in 1947 to more than double that, $47,173, in 1980. Then, for the next 25 years, except for some moderate growth during the Clinton years, there was almost no growth in median income at all, which rose only to $56,194 by 2005 (85% of that growth accounted for during the Clinton years).
Originally posted by mybigunit
You have two options here. You can dramatically shrink government and end the 16th Amendment for all or you can jack up taxes on the rich. One way or another we have to get our budget in check and lower taxes without smaller government aka Reaganomics does not work.
Originally posted by RRconservative
Higher taxes on the wealthy leads to the wealthy taking money out of the economy.
Originally posted by grover
Originally posted by RRconservative
Higher taxes on the wealthy leads to the wealthy taking money out of the economy.
Why shouldn't those who benefit most pay the most?
Trickle down economy is a baldfaced lie.
DENVER - This ski season is shaping up to be the worst in years, said a Canadian ski-resort company that has announced it has laid off workers across a dozen resorts, including three in Colorado.
Colorado's Steamboat Ski & Resort, for example, is more than three hours by car from Denver. Because of that, most visitors fly in and stay several days, while smaller resorts closer to big cities have an easier time surviving a poor economy.
"They're not as dependent on out-of- state and international visitors," Dave Belin, director at Boulder-based research firm RRC Associates, told the Rocky Mountain News.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Thanks to all who posted!
MBU I appreciate that coming from you! I understand and appreciate your libertarian philosophy. I have not seen it practiced successfully in modern times on a scale that the USA would require. If you know of an example please point it out. I want to say I love the ideal of a small to non existent federal gov which has nearly zero per cent role in my life. Including: no foreign wars, no troops stationed abroad, only enough defense spending to secure our borders, no goverment laws regarding personal preferences. I hear you.
But it is not going to happen...at least not yet ...maybe after a long period of socialism can we have enlightened anarchy.
In the meantime here we are! I am constantly amazed how so called conservative can support these RINO's. The progressives are much more concerned with individual liberties than these contemporary "conservatives".
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by mybigunit
HAHAHA really huh?
So your saying if you get rid of the massive Federal Bureaucracy that we will somehow magically save money.. That by allocating expenses and projects to localities based on the average income of the region is more responsible? .. That getting rid of hundreds of Alphabet organizations we are going to be better off???
I just won't believe it!!
PS. Someone point out one thing in life that is not taxed by the Federal Government. Waiting. Waiting. Whats that? Standing still? LOITERING FINE!!!
Government has money. It makes it up anyways.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Oh I quite agree!!!
But honestly though, the people of California won't like it when the 49 other states stop paying their bills......
Regional and personal responsibility is so 1776.