posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 07:19 AM
posted by wmd_2008
Have a looK at this link all of YOU who believe in the demolition this is posted on another site (that thinks that way) look at the e-mail shown
After the first paragraph they have this sentance
That the towers were demolished in a controlled manner was noted immediately by some astute observers:
Read the e-mail sent by David Rostcheck-David Rostcheck one of the SUPPOSED astute observers
Please read his e-mail can you spot THE MISTAKE he makes!
REINFORCE CONCRETE NO! BOMB ?!
Now if people DONT even know HOW the building is made YET they all seem to be able to spot explosives going off!
DONT THINK SO
You certainly took Mr David Rostcheck completely out of context didn't you? Was that on purpose? Is that called dishonesty? How did you overlook the
fact that Mr David Rostcheck posted that e-mail on 9-11-2001? There was not much information on the construction of the WTC Towers on
9-11-2001 at 3:12 pm was there
? As you likely knew, the 'terrorist bomb
' Mr David Rostcheck referred to was the 1993 bombing.
Was that also deliberate disnonesty on your part? Mr David Rostcheck reported the obvious deliberate demolition of the towers from his personal
observations on that very day and here 7 years later you cynically castigated him because he did not know the construction method of the Towers on
9-11? You are something else. Why are you people always so inevitably dishonest? Isn't this your nation and the future for your children
Let us take a look at the remainder of Mr David Rostcheck's very observant e-mail.
From: "David Rostcheck"
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: WTC bombing
- The stories from the impact point up burn horribly. Note, fire moves upward, not downward.
- The second plane hits the second tower, lower and moving faster. It blows a bigger hole through it, showering debris on the street, but the building
is clearly still standing and still looks quite solid.
- The second building begins burning, also from the impact point up.
- Perhaps a half hour later, the fire in the first building *goes out*. It is still smouldering and letting off black smoke, but there is no flame.
Anyone who saw the documentary on that horrid skyscraper fire in Philadelphia that led to the codes requiring sprinklers on every floor knows why.
There's no way to get fire apparatus into a skyscraper effectively, so it needs to be designed into the structure - which it is. The water flows from
the roof reservoirs down. Sprinklers can kill incredible infernos, and that's what these do.
- The fire in the second building goes out.
- Then, later, the second building suddenly crumbles into dust, in a smooth wave running from the top of the building (above the burned part) down
through all the stories at an equal speed. The debris falls primarily inward. The tower does not break off intact and collapse into other buildings.
The bottom does not crumble before the top. The burned out section crumbles also. The crumbling comes from the top (above the damage). It moves at a
uniform rate. All of the structural members are destroyed in a smooth pattern, so there is no remaining skeleton. The damage is uniform, symmetric,
In summary, it looks exactly like a demolition - because that's what it is.
- The first tower collapses in a similar demolition wave.
There's no doubt that the planes hit the building and did a lot of damage. But look at the footage - those buildings were *demolished*. To demolish a
building, you don't need all that much explosive but it needs to be placed in the correct places (in direct contact with the structural members) and
ignited in a smooth, timed sequence. Someone had to have had a lot of access to all of both towers and a lot of time to do this.
This is pretty grim. The really dire part is - what were the planes for? If you're going to demolish the building, what's the point of the flashy
The way they're cutting the footage on the news now makes it look like the buildings crumbled soon after being hit by the planes, which is not true.
They've also started slowing the clips from after the demolition explosion starts, so you don't see the top of the building go first - but
those who taped it, go back and look at the early first-run clips.
If, in a few days, not one official has mentioned anything about the demolition part, I think we have a REALLY serious problem.
This message was posted to the internet on September 11th 2001, within hours of the collapse of the Twin Towers. Right from the beginning, some people
were not deceived. As the third anniversary of this event approached many Americans were still clueless.
[edit on 12/13/08 by SPreston]