reply to post by thefreepatriot
Yeah, because you know, lifespans haven't been increasing as technology, medicine, industry, and education have been substantially improved... you
know, in modern times in industrialized nations with all our pollution and big pharma and what-not.
Not to say that the current way we live our lives is optimal, or even expressly healthy, but medical and forensic history is clear. We live much
longer now than we did 100 years ago. 500 years ago. 100,000 years ago. Even if it could be substantiated that modern living shortens our potential
lifespans, the society we live in allows us to live much longer on average before succumbing to disease, barbarism, accidents, infant mortality, etc.
Not to say that you are intrinsically wrong in your statement, but that you're horribly oversimplifying the situation. We can definitely make
improvements in our environments, diets, and habits to help extend our lives... but we're far better off where we are now, than where humanity was at
any time in our known history.
Uh... also... not all animals are set to the same biological aging clock. You can't point to turtles as an example of how humanity is poisoning
itself. It doesn't work that way. Imagine the horribly stressful and polluted lives that fruit flies must lead as they only live 24 hours! (Not an
accurate statement of their lifespans, but you get my drift.)
[edit on 23-11-2008 by Lasheic]