|
reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 10:58 PM by DarkspARCS
|
ok....
The video, as most, has convincing imagery. The skeptics have produced a very good imagery response to the likelyhood of what the object may be...
However, can you guys give me an explanation pertaining to the smaller blinking objects that were recorded BEFORE the object appeared? The speaker in
the video referenced 12 of them, myself really only counting 4 to 6 of them, with one shot containing two at a time.
Paper Lanterns don't have blinking orbs that proceed their path of travel, do they?
However, I've got a little idea about the whole affair...
Here's how you can produce something of this magnitude. Attach a coil of airplane wire roughly 2000 feet in length to a small airplane. along the
length of the wire attach blinking lights, with the larger object at it's tail end... then just take off lol..... BINGO, instant UFO!
It's best to fly the plane at night with it's running lights darkened, so that the wire cant be seen as well as making the lights more profound.
Great footage Mr. Air Force Pilot!
[edit on 22-11-2008 by DarkspARCS]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 11:44 PM by Jb0311NY
|
what a great video... They are stranger each time.
May we prey that they step in and dethrone our elite. I don't belive we can fight them, but our brother's from a distant star can mabye show them
it's not good to play with matches
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 11:46 PM by Phage
|
reply to post by DarkspARCS
I'd call it more like flickering than blinking and judging from the movement of the trees, there's a nice breeze blowing.
The video is short but have a look at the :20 mark.
[edit on 22-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:38 AM by eniac
|
nice find, but probably a balloon rig
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 03:21 AM by GioTheGreek
|
Originally posted by warrenb
good closeup
more and more UFO's being seen lately...somethings up
Man o man, that's the same balloon for sure, imho.
Piyah! Chinese kung-fu balloon debunk.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 10:59 AM by Lastone
|
Paper hot air balloons ... So big and they do fly very very fast...
The cars stoping to watch the big ballon.... police cars etc...
Maybe it was exceeding velocity limits in the area.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 11:06 AM by Lastone
|
One question ..
Paper hot air balloons have to be released in low wind conditions.... so they go up up and away isn't it ??
Maybe sideways with litle wind but up...uppppp
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 11:19 AM by malignant_tumor
|
Originally posted by Faiol
okay, if this is a baloom, why the object just disappear ?
I'm curious as to what balooms are.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 11:24 AM by RFBurns
|
That was impressive???
Hardly. Ive seen better footage from old 1950's films that at least had a steady camera.
Ok video 101.
Please find something steady to put your camera on when your shooting UFO's so we can get a nice clean, steady video to look at!!!!
OR turn on the "steady shot" mode on your camera!!!!
And for pete's sake, FOCUS!!!!
Cheers!!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 11:26 AM by Phage
|
reply to post by Lastone
That video looks nothing like the video being discussed.
Why do you insist on adding extraneous videos to an existing thread?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 11:42 AM by Lastone
|
reply to post by Phage
Because it as everything to do with it.
A ballon as nothing to do with it and still you show it as evidence that the original video can be a Ballon.
My video is as related to the thread as ballons.
Ballons are very very diferent from the first video still it is related to it ??
It is amazing what people try to do to discredit evidence. Everything is valide to make something look fake, not the other way around.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:12 PM by Phage
|

|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:20 PM by ArMaP
|
reply to post by Lastone
Balloons will go up until they reach an altitude that has the air at the same density as the balloon.
If the balloon starts loosing temperature or reaches an area with hotter air then it will stop going up.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:26 PM by The Coward
|
MEXICO HAS NOT BEEN INVADED BY ETs, THEY HAVE NEVER HAD A UFO WAVE!!!
WHEN WILL SOME PEOPLE AT ATS GET THAT THREW THEIR LIQUIFIED BRAINS!!!
JAIME MAUSSAN IS A DIRTY RAT LIAR WHO ONLY IS IN THE UFO FIELD FOR $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
MEXICO=NO ET UFOs! NONE, NADA, NIENTE, NOTHING GET IT THREW THAT SKULL KIDS!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:40 PM by Lastone
|
reply to post by Phage
Yes it looks like it... but that isn't the same as being it.
Look like and be it is a very diferent thing.
And that is what this is all about.
You may say it looks like it.... but can you say it is the same thing ??
No problem in presenting options... but to say that thing is a ballon .. and that's it the video is debunked.... two very different things.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 12:46 PM by Phage
|
reply to post by Lastone
If it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck.
Maybe it's not a duck?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 01:03 PM by ArMaP
|
I wanted to do this before, but I forgot about this thread, so I can only post now how it looks with some gamma correction.
I forgot to add that it looks so much like that balloon that I think it may be the same type of thing, if not the exact same object.
[edit on 23/11/2008 by ArMaP]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 01:40 PM by Lastone
|
reply to post by Phage
Yep ... if it looks like a woman it must be a woman ...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 01:47 PM by Phage
|
reply to post by Lastone
Good point. The eye can be fooled. And it doesn't always require the use of intentional illusion. A balloon can be mistaken for a very large object.
A star can be mistaken for a flashing orb.
Probably the root of most UFO sitings.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 02:00 PM by Lastone
|
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Lastone
Good point. The eye can be fooled. And it doesn't always require the use of intentional illusion. A balloon can be mistaken for a very large object.
A star can be mistaken for a flashing orb.
Probably the root of most UFO sitings.
Or not.... and that's the right question.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |