Media Resource on So-called 'Assault Weapons', page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 22-11-2008 @ 08:17 AM by thisguyrighthere
Over the last several weeks, hundreds of stories have appeared nationwide about increasing firearm sales due to gun owners' concerns that President-elect Obama and a Democrat-controlled Congress will pass legislation limiting the Second Amendment rights of Americans.


Firearms retailers report that many firearm customers are interested in buying semi-automatic rifles that have a military look to them. There is much confusion among the public and the media about how these rifles function and about their legitimate uses for target shooting and hunting. Often incorrectly referred to as semi-automatic "assault weapons," they are the type of firearms that President-elect Obama has indicated he would seek to ban by making permanent the expired 1994 so-called "assault weapons" ban.


Few media stories have explained the difference between true fully automatic military assault rifles and the politically labeled, so-called "assault rifle."


To help promote accurate reporting about these commonplace semi-automatic firearms, the National Shooting Sports Foundation has produced a media resource page located on the NSSF.org Web site in the Media Resources section at nssf.org... There are helpful videos that explain the difference between fully automatic military and semi-automatic military look-alike rifles, and a Q&A section.


www.marketwatch.com...{FE6082DF-EEAF-4064-9A14-9413FB1B10B8}
nssf.org...

How many news outlets will take advantage pf the information?

On a local level I've been offering my assistance to town outlets for years. I've proven the local cops that unnamed local paper would use as resources wrong in writing and on camera and was still ignored and passed up by the local outlets in favor of their hand-picked biased or selectively ignorant 'experts' on the subject more than once.

This resource and assistance offered here by the NSSF is nothing new. It will be labeled as 'biased' or 'extremist' and passed up for resources the media knows will echo their ignorant sentiment--> guns are bad.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 08:27 AM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Raustin



It would be a nice change of pace wouldnt it?

With people like Chris Matthews vowing to make the Obama administration (one whose stated goal is to reinstate the AWB permanently) a success I doubt gun owners will be getting anything remotely resembling a fair shake from the news media.



reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 08:34 AM by Raustin
reply to post by thisguyrighthere



We sure won't be portrayed fairly. I keep hearing that Obama won't have the votes etc..., I have a feeling he is going to get whatever he wants. The fact that he has publicly endorsed a new AWB, won't limit lawsuits on gun manufacturers, and seems to even dislike pistols and ALL automatics has me pretty scared. I just hope I can keep the automatic shotgun I inherited from my Grandfather. Probably not though, I suppose I am not to be trusted with ANY firearms.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 08:55 AM by Raustin
reply to post by ChrisF231



When you have to bury your guns, it's time to start using them (Grandpa quote). I wonder how many people will be turned into criminals overnight.


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 10:37 AM by Raustin
reply to post by GenRadek



Think I might just pick up a copy. Can you imagine a fight between conservatives and liberals?

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 13 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 1 days ago with 11 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags