|
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 06:15 PM by Phage
|
reply to post by stealthyaroura
I believe that would be camera motion.
second line.
[edit on 23-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 07:51 PM by stealthyaroura
|
reply to post by Phage
so your saying someone is waving a camera at some sort of illuminated object and the person in question is doing so in some kind of robotic arm
movements? well yes maybe, i was merely making a comparison of the movement to that of the Nelli's UFO.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-11-2008 @ 09:50 PM by Aria Pano
|
new to the site... can one get an image to show up in a post?
img291.imageshack.us...
This my 3D speculation formed by impressions from the station's video posted on the net. I sent it to the station to see if their "Air10" crew
think it looks like what they saw.
My speculation/impression for this artwork is that there is a steady red light on the top center that reflects off a conical top section. Further
speculation is that all the other white flashes are not lights, but something like plasma jets that help to both levitate and maneuver the vehicle;
(this includes some that appear on the top.)
I have shown the plasma-jets simultaneously all ON here.
(These apparently circular-arranged flashes have been seen in other UFO videos; whether those videos are legit or not I'm not sure.)
I'm agnostic on ET craft; but certainly am open to the possibility.
(let's also try this image posting method)
By yeda7w at 2008-11-23
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:09 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
reply to post by DaddyBare
I'd like to add regarding firsts: Betty and Barney Hill were not [the first] abductees (early 60s). In the mid-50s a woman was abducted in Tujunga
Canyon. The case is covered in the excellent book "The Tujunga Contacts" by Ann Druffel. After all this time and interest in UFOs, one would think
the world would get this fact straight. Both Tujunga and Topanga canyons in the L.A. area have been hot spots for over half a century.
Paul Perner
====
Mod Edit: spelling and minor corrections
[edit on 11/24/2008 by Badge01]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:11 AM by CPYKOmega
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:20 AM by Ravens and Doves
|
reply to post by Phage
Advertising blimps and planes don't fly much higher than news helicopters, otherwise people wouldn't be able to notice or read the display. The
helicopter pilots would have been able to identify the craft if it was an advertisment, which it clearly is not.
Paul Perner
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:27 AM by Phage
|
reply to post by Ravens and Doves
They didn't say "much higher", just "higher". The pilot makes it clear he really couldn't judge the distance or size of the lights. Off to the
side and near the same level, the advertising would not be readable.
And, again, I don't know what it was, the video is pretty bad and brief. Really all we see is some winky, blinky lights.
edit: the report does say "considerably higher"
[edit on 24-11-2008 by Phage]
[edit on 24-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 01:58 AM by Zeptepi
|
Now that IS a stunning video. Helo pilot and news cameraman. (reasonably high credibility and high observational skills) good description as to
distance and perceived altitude in relation to their +1300ft alt. "considerably higher". This is one of the best I have seen in a long time.
Great find, and thanks for posting it here! Big flag and star!
I will be waiting patiently for our friend Internos to enhance and graphically illustrate more of these screen shots.
Aria Pano:
Outstanding illustration! very nice work. Thanks
I'm staying tuned to this one
Side note:Notice the difference in the quality of the postings here, in comparison to the posts on the news channel blog? The Quality of posting at
ATS is so much better!
Peace
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 10:42 AM by Phage
|
There is an "eyewitness" to an advertising aircraft. (Comment posted at 08:24 PST) I wish it were a bit more dignified, I don't even want to quote
it.
WHAT A BUNCH OF GOONES, IT WAS A PLANE WITH A SCROLLING MESSAGE, IT CAME RIGHT OVER MY HOME IN CITRUS HEIGHTS AND WAS ADVERTISING CAR SALES FOR
THE AUTO MALL, MY SON SAW IT ALSO ON HIS WAY HOME FROM WORK
www.news10.net...
[edit on 24-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 11:35 AM by commodore64
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:02 PM by LordThumbs
|
feel free to follow my link to an ATS thread about supporting local news and UFO
topics
Im sorry but i dont buy the flying american advertising plane reaction. just because someone said they saw a plane advertising doesnt really link them
to the actual UFO incident. there is not credible ties, yet someone who is avidly trying to debunk this will stop in their tracks after seeing the
quote about parent and their son seeing an AD plane. 
im really excited to know that there are now two recent incidents in sacramento and rocklin area!!
for the cost of fuel these days (regardless of the recent fall in prices) you dont want to take a chance by flying too high with an AD plane. that
type of advertising strategy isnt even good for sacramento, i live here and it i can honestly say that avenue is the least eye catching strategy,
although this is my opinion and doesnt contribute to the actual 'event' on friday night.
if anyone in sac wants to get together and talk about this ( even if new events transpire in the next few days) hit me up via U2U!
regretibly i was driving to bakersfield on friday night
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 12:30 PM by ufoorbhunter
|
An advertising plane? Does that really answer this mystery? In the UK we get these kind of cover ups using the typical chinese lantern excuse. Looking
at the footage it looks like something other than advertising (by humans anyway). The pretty much constant red orb above the others is so typical of a
cluster.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 09:07 PM by Flux8
|
Did that happen tonite? (Nov 24) Hmmm, maybe it's the same guys that flew over my house in July. It looks like they're saying "merry
christmas". Get your camera's ready Sacramentans.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 09:13 PM by Phage
|
Confirmed
The mystery surrounding a series of lights seen hovering over Roseville Friday night has been solved.
www.news10.net...
[edit on 24-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 24-11-2008 @ 10:20 PM by Flux8
|
Hahahaha, good catch Phage! We do have a lot of air traffic around here. It doesn't appear that the indicator lights are on, though. They should
give him a citation.
[edit on 24-11-2008 by Flux8]
[edit on 25-11-2008 by Flux8]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 12:25 AM by Zeptepi
|
reply to post by Phage
Good catch Phage.
You got this one. Unidentified, now identified.
I am slightly amazed that the helo pilot did not ask ATC about the traffic.
Maybe he is flying buddies with the ad-plane piliot. Great free advertising.
I wonder if the gal Ben proposed to said yes, well not really.
Peace
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 12:44 AM by Phage
|
reply to post by Zeptepi
Yep, a traffic inquiry would have seemed to be in order.
(does the "edit" tag constitute a second line?)
[edit on 25-11-2008 by Phage]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-11-2008 @ 05:35 AM by hande
|
Here is very similar footage from Sacramento September 14 2008. You should check this out. Maybe this gives info what this really is..
You-tube
"""The final episode of the video footage that my roommate captured from Sacramento California facing south. He makes reference to some stars that
are not visible however the moon, Venus and alien activity is definitely clear. """
|
copyright & usage
|
 |