Did you vote both of them?
... For me this is like good example from pure US capitalism;
"Buy one, take two!"
With Hillary Clinton as Obama’s secretary of state, and a bevy of war hawks ensconced in key national security posts – just like the neocons in
the Bush administration – the War Party will be well-represented in the foreign policy councils of the new administration. It looks like we’re in
for a long, agonizingly drawn out drama, which may very well end the same way the last one did.
There’s just one way to preempt this and that is to show, early on, that the voters who gave Obama his victory won’t stand for this kind of
betrayal. We don’t want another war – and that means we have to stop Hillary, the War Party’s chief Democratic asset, before she’s officially
designated the new Secretary of State. If thousands (upon thousands!) of Americans protest, who knows but maybe we can stop it. Yes we can! So call
the transition office, if you haven’t already, and say: No Hillary, no way, no how! Call: 202-540-3000 or use their web form.
www.antiwar.com...
WEB FORM:
www.change.gov...
NO MORE WARS! 
|
reply to post by JanusFIN
A lot of threads saying that Obama is taking a hawkish turn with his post selections, but these members are forgetting the financial situation that
the US is in and will remain in for quite a while. The days of military adventurism are over the the US and everyone knows it in Washington. Obama may
stick it out in Afghanistan for a few years, but don't expect any new wars to start as a result of the US for the next 4 years, at least.
What's more, I think the hardline Hill and BO took in the primaries against Iran was strategic and had no basis in reality.
[edit on 21-11-2008 by Silenceisall]
|
I know alot of people who voted for Obama just so Clinton wouldn't have any power....I told them to vote for McCain or Huckabee
|
