Ultimate Snub Fest: World Leaders Refuse to Shake Bush's Hand During G20 Photo-Op , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:34 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by mind is the universe



I understand your resentment toward Bush but I think it was necessary that we responded to these terrorists even though I disagree with many of his policies. What do you think would have happened if we just let them badmouth us on the world stage? Would you rather have us appease to the terrorists?


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:38 AM by mind is the universe
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
reply to
post by mind is the universe



Maybe you think they're illegal wars, but, they aren't wars at all technically. They're "military actions". We haven't had a real war since WWII.


The most stupid quote of the year award for sure.


It's a bit like, "Oh I walked down the street and stabbed a man, but heck at least I didn't kill him, so It's not that wrong is it?" So it's all good.

Yet after a long break from here, I come back to ATS, and I'm just sitting here thinking, I just cannot believe the stupidty I'm witnessing again on here by other human being's. It's just unbelievable. My head hurts right now, for those who are clueless.

I thought people are supposed to learn and grow? Have we not learned simple morals on behaviour? After such turmoil over the last 8 years, after so much shock and unstability we've come into force with. After so much lies and deception.
Why is it that some Adult's don't understand what it is to be an adult, and what it is we are responsible for being.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:39 AM by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by Frankidealist35



WHAT TERRORISTS?!!

How do you even DEFINE THAT WORD? A terrorist can be loosely identified as anyone who seeks to bring harm to your agenda...

That would identify ANYONE who speaks out against American Hegemony as a terrorist! ABSURD...

Diplomacy is the key. With good diplomacy and good relations you WON'T HAVE terrorists.

How about the United States' actions in the middle east? Do you think THEY view US as terrorists?! You bet your ass they do. But they probably have even MORE colorful language for us. Infidels.



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:39 AM by mind is the universe
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
reply to
post by mind is the universe



I understand your resentment toward Bush but I think it was necessary that we responded to these terrorists even though I disagree with many of his policies. What do you think would have happened if we just let them badmouth us on the world stage? Would you rather have us appease to the terrorists?



Terrorist's? I don't watch fox news.

Who is bad mouthing exactly?


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:43 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by mind is the universe



Terrorists? So you don't believe Al-quaeda is a threat?

So you don't believe in a war on terror?

You believe 9-11 was caused by our Government to take control of the world?


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:45 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Jay-in-AR



Terrorists are people who use military action to disrupt other Government's policies. By that you could say that Bush is a terrorist and that Al-quaeda is a terrorist organization... I am talking about the Al-quaeda terrorists.



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:46 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Jay-in-AR



No, I don't believe that.

What made you think that?

I know they hate our very existence because we support Israel. It may be because of the reason you suggested, but, we haven't really caused that much trouble in that region before 9-11 have we? I thought we mostly have been supporting peace initiatives there. It seems to me like they want us out of there so they can rule over the middle east.

[edit on 21-11-2008 by Frankidealist35]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:46 AM by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by Frankidealist35



Yes, and you could say the same about any military force on the planet.

So why don't we drop the misnomer term "terrorists" and use the actual term... Military force.

However, I would add that even THAT is only a simplified version of the term. In reality, it doesn't require a military force at all. You could be labelled a terrorist for economic reasons, for instance.
The terrorist term is something that politicians conjure up to TERRIfy people like you.
Who are the terrorist?
When we quibble over bad policy using bad terms in our discourse, we never get to the reality of the situation...
The reality here is that this man deserved nothing more than being snubbed on a world stage. Like I said, I would have enjoyed seeing someone kick him in the groin.



[edit on 21-11-2008 by Jay-in-AR]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:47 AM by mind is the universe
reply to post by Frankidealist35




LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!


But government policies uses millitary stikes in killing too, what are you trying to say terrorists are bad and the governement not?

Listen to yourself man....


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:49 AM by pieman
reply to post by Frankidealist35



just to be clear, bin ladens stated aim is to get US forces out of saudi aribia. where are you getting isreal?



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:49 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by Jay-in-AR



Okay then... but I remain with my view that the military force of Al-quaeda is not just dedicated to fighting our country but to also fighting the other countries of which they disagree with. They don't hate us for our freedoms. They just hate us because they are really cynical and they hate the free world (The west and Europe) because apparently we disagree with their ideology and we don't worship Allah. They want to convert us and destroy us. I would think it would be stupid to say that they're fighting against us because of our aggression in their region. I think they would have done this anyways.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:50 AM by Frankidealist35
reply to post by MetatronCubensis



Accepting donations from corporations during the campaign season does not equate to giving into them. At least that's what I believe.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:52 AM by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by Frankidealist35



Well, I cannot really speculate at the personal motives of any man, woman or child. But if I could I would venture to guess that their motives have NOTHING to do with being "free" (hahahaha, as if the people in this country are actually free to do anything) and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that we exploit their misfortune in order to get cheap oil.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
  Posted 12 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
  Posted 12 days ago with 35 member flags
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
  Posted 3 days ago with 27 member flags
What\'s With The Obama Love on ATS Today?
  Posted 14 days ago with 25 member flags
Obama and why he\'ll still be president...
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Whats your banjo story?
  Music, Posted 2 minutes ago
Greetings and Salutations
  Introductions, Posted 3 minutes ago
Modern Terrorism
  Jokes, Puns, & Pranks, Posted 5 minutes ago
Finally made an account on ATS
  Introductions, Posted 14 minutes ago
Another new one......
  Introductions, Posted 15 minutes ago
Shock analysis. World Exclusive
  Rant, Posted 41 minutes ago
Tool - Ænema
  Music, Posted 45 minutes ago