The "Big Three" bailout is currently hot news, and something that should be discussed.
The problem is that there is a stink of hypocrisy about plans to oppose a bailout.
If the automakers have got themselves into a mess of their own making, then so did the banks - but it's the banks who get bailed out, because they are
seen as being more important.
This may have an element of truth, but it's also true that the banks got money because they had the right friends in the right places, which resulted
in probably the biggest taxpayer ripoff of all time.
Tell autoworkers that bankers getting a multi-million dollar bonus are more important they are.
It is also arguable that more jobs will be lost if the automakers go under - but it is the banking industry that is at fault for all of this with
their incessant greed, and their philosophy that an individual can never have too much money.
There's also the question of profligate waste and conspicuous consumption by western nations - not just america - for which the bill is now becoming
due.
This philosophy was all very well in the years after WWII, when economic revitalisation was essential to growth and the changeover from a wartime
economy to a peacetime one, with the added expense of the re-building programme in Europe, BUT I firmly believe the time has come to lower our sights
on what we consider to be an acceptable standard of living, and count ourselves lucky that we had so many good years.
rawstory.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



Sorry but that's a moron thing to say that someone is an idiot because you disagree with them sometimes. There's a difference between disagreeing
and being wrong.