Here is a related article that demonstrates people's overall ignorance of what the internet is:
yahoo news article
some choice quotes:
"Biggs, who has said he was at work during the episode, said he had not known about his son's online presence."
So in other words, he can't be bothered to do any actual parenting, but he sure can get outraged when complete strangers fail to do it for him.
""I think after this incident and probably other incidents that have occurred in the past, they all point to some kind of regulation is necessary,"
Biggs said. "I think it is wrong to have this happen for hours without any action being taken from the people in charge. Where were they all the
time?""
The people in charge? who is that exactly? The Federal Bureau of Chat Rooms? I think its pretty telling in this case anyway, because 'the people in
charge' was you, Mr. Biggs. You were the kids father and legal guardian. That idea doesn't sell newspapers or get people elected though...
And then theres this:
" Although some viewers contacted the Web site to notify police, authorities did not reach his house in time." ... then
"Biggs Sr. said he believes the webcast was a cry for help.
"But rather than get help, he was ignored," Biggs said. "I would not want to see anything like that on the Internet and not try and get help for
that young man. I think that's what the average person would do. Any normal person would do. I'm really appalled.""
Well which was it? Either some "viewers" (again, demonstrating a general lack of understanding of what a discussion forum even is) contacted the web
site, or nobody did anything. Which was it? The article seems to state both.
Bottom line: WE (the internet) should not have to be responsible for raising YOUR kid, even if he's going to kill himself.
Finally, I leave you with this thought:
"The father of a college student whose suicide was broadcast live over a webcam said Saturday he was appalled by the virtual audience that egged on
his son and called for tougher regulation of Internet sites."
Yeah, good luck with that. Its called "The World Wide Web" for a reason.
Not to mention, "tougher regulation"? Um, I'm pretty sure there is *no* regulation of Internet sites, beyond copyright infringement and threats of
violence, and even those are pretty much covered under other laws.