Originally posted by detachedindividual
As I said in my last post on this, there is no artistic merit in media depicting torture and murder, so the enjoyment has to be voyeuristic and sadistic in nature.
No. I don't enjoy the 'splatter-porn' genre (ie Saw, Hostel), but to say that it has no artistic merit is to deny the very subjectivity that makes art art. I think The Scream is a pretty horrible painting. I wouldnt pay ten dollars for it. Clearly, somebody sees more merit in it than I do. Just because I can't see the artistic merit in a piece, I can't say something like, "It has no artistic merit."
Just that I don't see it.
It's like picking up a stranger's wedding photo album and saying, "That photo album has no value." You don't see it, but there may be (and probably are) people that find value in it.
Also, on the original topic, this is something I personally would never watch. But then, if I lived in Roman times I probably wouldn't have gone to the arena, either. I don't watch racing, and many of the people I know that do watch it just watch it for the crashes. They cannot be held responsible if someone tries to corner at ludicrous speeds and crashes and kills themselves. The peasants that watched the gladiators stab each other to death cannot be held responsible for that. Entertainment has a loooong history of violence, and this is probably the next step. Attempts to regulate live video feed over the internet will probably just lead to us losing the last real venue of free speech left in the US.
[edit on 24-11-2008 by LSDeviant]


