Why Do So Many Christians Not Understand/Accept That People Don't Hate Jesus?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 11:09 AM by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by pieman
reply to
post by Merriman Weir



to be honest, i haven't actually read the latest thread hanging around the recent posts list, i've read threads of simular sentiment and can't face reading the same arguments all over again.


Well, there's a current thread - that inspired this one - that I'd suggest not reading as it's bizarre to say the least.

i'm not claiming any of the things i'm suggesting are my opinion in particular, i'm really just addressing the questions/sentiments you posed in the OP.


the trouble is, the christian outlook is based in belief, so belief becomes a personal truth. our whole society, like it or not, is based largely on a christian outlook. science may be more influential at present, however it makes itself removed from normality while making us lazy about inquiry and thought, and so we revert to standard, which is a christian (perhaps religious) outlook.


When it comes to society, we'll have to agree to disagree with this. Undoubtedly it has basis and roots in Christianity, but I'm not sure how much influence it has now. I'm not sure where you're from and I can only speak for England, but the Christianity has very little influence now. Yes, you get people saying they're 'C of E' &c, but how many of them are familiar with the bible, go to church (aside from weddings and funerals), observe holy days (even know what or when they are) or generally act on the Christian message? How 'Christian' will this year's Christmas be for the bulk of Britain do you think?

I think too much of 'Christianity' actually runs counter to the way people (willingly) live their lives now. I think if they were forced to choose between the two, there wouldn't have been as many churches burned down since the 16th C.

we, as a society, believe in a diametrically opposed argument between belief and non-belief with hatred of every aspect of the opposition intrinsic to both sides.

the expression of this is evident in the fact that despite a majority of posts stating no hate for christ, this does not comply to the individuals personal truth. in order for these statements to be inserted into a personal truth they are assumed to be an individual belief.


I don't know whether you've read Jacques Derrida, but a lot of his work revolves around Western philosophy (and therefore society) and its predisposition to see things in binary terms. So, yes, I agree with this.

perhaps i did focus a little on athiests, but non-believers tend to be gentler in their arguement towards christianity and so aren't so prone to muddy the waters.


I disagree with this. I think it's actually atheists that are actually more vehement in their argument and prone to 'muddy the waters'. In a sense, people with religion, whether they agree or not, tend to have a commonality simply through belief in what amounts to a supernatural belief. Whereas atheists, not sharing that belief, often have to bring something completely different to the table in order to argue their point. Fairly often - although not always, as not all atheists are 'evangelical' in their (non)beliefs and feel no need to debate the issue - they bring science to the table to use as a debating tool. Nothing muddies religious waters like science!

Although that's not to say they are incompatible by any means.

[edit on 21-11-2008 by Merriman Weir]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 12:13 PM by defcon5
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Why does 'religiously correct' trump 'politically correct'? Why are you so adamant you're right?

IMHO, because politically correct is really nothing more then peer pressure, when religion is a philosophical belief. Its like asking why does Religion trump anything else in this world, it is because the Law of God supersedes the laws and opinions of man.

Originally posted by Merriman Weir
As far as homosexuals bringing "their war to Christianity, not the other way around"; do you really believe that?

Yes.
I have seen it first hand. There was a preacher on TV at night in my local area, used to simply answer prayers, not really preach much. Anyway, he had a caller on one night who explained how he had escaped the “bondage” of a homosexual lifestyle, and so on. The Lobby down here went ballistic, they started a war on the show, and it was all pretty well documented as to their tactics in these situations. They are quite sneaky about it, and the minute they catch any of the fault for the situation, they play the "politically correct" guilt trip card. One of their first steps is they try and find out who provides the funding for the show so they protest their business in drag, putting on all the sexually explicit drama possible, to scare away their customers. The business normally folds and stops supporting the Christian organization.

In this instance they lost, because the show did not use any businesses for support...
However, some of their tactics were put right out there for all to see.

Originally posted by Merriman Weir
Historically, Christianity has always villainised homosexuality, long before there was a unified front regarding equality for homosexuals.

Eh......
Nope, don't pass go, and don't collect $200...
It did not start with Christianity, it started with Judaism, and Muslims.
Christ had very little to say about the subject, though he was quite clear that all sexual activity outside of marriage is sinful. Just go try and pull any of that bull crap over in the middle east and see how far they get. Oh, but thats right... the Christians over here in the US are easy targets, so lets pick on them some more.

As a matter of fact, name me one mainline religion that accepts Gay marriages?

Originally posted by Merriman Weir
That's been a relatively new development, whereas homosexuals have been murdered, beaten and attempted to be 'cured' of their homosexuality for a hell of a lot longer.

And most of the people who have done that stuff are not necessarily Christians, homophobia is not a religious theology. BTW you know what the Muslims do to folks in their countries? Funny I don't see them over there protesting, or picking on the Muslim religion like the do Christians.
Muslims are far, far, far more anti-homosexual then Christians are.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 12:31 PM by americandingbat
reply to post by Merriman Weir



First off, thanks for starting this thread, Merriman, because just reading it has made some stuff a little clearer to me.

I think a few really good points have been made explaining why some Christians can't seem to hear "I don't hate Jesus, I just hate organized religion".

1) the need to set things up as a false dichotomy – and those of us on the atheist/agnostic side are guilty of this too.

2) sometimes I have heard people (not usually atheists or agnostics, obviously) say that they don't hate Jesus, they hate God. From a Christian perspective, that doesn't really make sense.

3) just as atheists look at believers with condescension (they need the "crutch" of religion), so do believers look at atheists with condescension (we are afraid to accept that there is a God). So both sides have a hard time believing anything the other side says; they just dismiss it as rationalizing their belief/disbelief because they're "in denial" about their "real motivation".

I think the concept of "denial" might be among the most insidious and nasty concepts introduced by daytime-TV-style pop psychology.

As for what happened on that other post, I pretty much covered my view of it yesterday. It ended up being more about the OP's feelings than about the feelings of those who he asked the question of. But that's really not that uncommon, on ATS or in life

Now I think I'll go see how Lucid Lunacy and defcon are getting along

[edit on 11/21/08 by americandingbat]



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 01:15 PM by defcon5
Originally posted by an0maly33
I was happy sitting on the sidelines and taking in the different viewpoints until i read this. I think you need to take a step back and read that line you typed. I'll just come back with "Christianity is a religion, not a lifestyle choice, and therefore does not deserve the same respect." You know. Just to get you thinking about it.

What are you trying to say? That a Religious Theology is the same as a Lifestyle Choice?

Na-ah...
A Religious Theology DICTATES your lifestyle choices. If it does not then you don't have a very strong faith in that theology. In Christian terms someone like this would be said to be a “lukewarm” or “wishy-washy” Christian.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Are African Americans doing the same thing because they feel "guilty" for being black?

Race is something that someone is born into, its not something that someone chooses to engage in. Apples and oranges. Heck I am discriminated against because I chose to smoke, but I accept that my choice to do that has certain ramifications and stigmas attached to it, if I chose to continue doing it. Are you going to say that I am oppressed the same as the African Americans are?

Originally posted by an0maly33
No, I'm not gay so don't run off and get your pitchforks and torches yet.

As I said before, even if you are, that is not really my concern or business as long as you keep it out of things that are my business, like what my kids get taught in school.

Originally posted by an0maly33
I just find it curious that you can have such..."selective respect" to those groups that you feel deserving of it. When you try to back it up with reasoning it STILL doesn't really make sense.

That is because you are trying to make equal two things that are not equal.

Originally posted by an0maly33
I doubt it. Gay...ism isn't a fetish. This argument isn't as extreme, but the logic fits well with others I've seen that compare gays to murderers.

They are sexual preferences, and thus exactly the same thing.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Last I checked the Church didn't have a monopoly on marriages.

Then you need to check again, marriage as a tradition comes from Religion. It predates any existing laws on this Earth today.

Originally posted by an0maly33
I myself was married by the state by a justice of the peace. They're not necessarily asking for rights to invade your church. Just rights to be legally considered a family unit.

Then don't call it marriage and don't ask to do it in church, that is what many Christians get up in arms about.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Close. I was taught to respect everyone.

It depends, you can respect everyone to a point, but not what everyone does. Were you taught to respect people who were criminals? Drug Dealers? Where do you want to draw the line.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Every time you rub me the wrong way, you will lose a bit though.

Guilt trip again? You think that is going to really effect my feelings on this?

Originally posted by an0maly33
For the record I was raised a Christian and I still have an inherent respect for the values and morals it embodies. But I just couldn't wrap my head around the idea that God would hate me for swearing, not going to church to worship, etc.

Then you did not understand a thing you were taught. God Loves everyone, its sin that he hates. God does not “send” people to hell, but rather he cannot allow anything sinful into his presence. You missed much of the point of Christianity obviously.

Originally posted by an0maly33
My stance on the issue is "I do my best to lead a good life, be a productive member of society, and instill values and morals in my children." If God is going to damn me for swearing like a sailor and never going to church along the way, then he doesn't deserve my worship.

Again, God does not damn you, your sins do that.

Originally posted by an0maly33
This is the beef I have with organized Christianity in general. I honestly don't know how people do it. Why would you readily accept the notion that the people you love more than anything could burn in eternal damnation just because they "sinned" - maybe they just didn't go to church enough.

Again you did not study when you were a Christian, which is why you never really understood it, unless you were a Catholic. You are talking about Works vs Grace. You cannot turn in enough boxtops to get into heaven, you need to read up on how Grace works.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Maybe some of us will have some learning to do or issues to work through (hell) before we're allowed in, but I'd like to think that we all end up in a heaven of sorts.

Universalism is a neat concept, but I would rather not have to count on it for my salvation.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Well to be blunt the gays have a better track record of not burning people at the stake for "heresy". Seriously, though I'm not sure what "agenda" your talking about.

If you truely read my first post you would see that it was not Christianity that did this, but rather the Roman Catholic Church. Many protestant religions consider the RCC to be the Beast of Revelations, including me.

Originally posted by an0maly33
And Defcon, I'm not out to attack you specifically, but you were the only one that chimed in on the Christian front and some of what you said I found a little offensive.

Well I am sorry for that, but I am trying to be truthful as possible.

Originally posted by an0maly33
The crux of the issue is not gays vs. Christians. It's this attitude of "We are right, everyone else is wrong - we'll pretend to "respect" you if you're different, but it's only a word to us - we actually believe that you're deserving of eternal torture.

I don't know a single Christian that thinks this way. I would not wish my worst enemy to go to hell, I don't think that anyone deserves that from my human perspective. Hell itself is an interesting concept that I could write a lot on, but it goes beyond my time to spend on here today. As to respect, I can respect certain things but I cannot respect certain actions. Christians also know they are not always right, but we are forgiven.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Sometimes we'll even tell you so to your face." I don't think Jesus would approve.

And maybe you were doing something that he would not have.

Originally posted by an0maly33
I see respect like this: If someone said they think they're gay, I might tell them to explore that and If they decided they were then I would be supportive - because I respect that. If you can't support something, it's a given that you don't actually respect it.

I would tell them its not really my business, which its not any more then who my friends pick up at the bar this weekend. However, they still know that if they asked me about it, I would tell them the truth, that its a sin. Kind of a don't ask don't tell policy, cause if you ask you know already what your going to get for an answer. Believe me I have sinned many times in my life as well, but i try not to make a habit of it.

Originally posted by an0maly33
Accept that other people live their lives the way they see fit, and most of the time they don't need or want anyone else telling them they're doing it wrong.

I believe I covered the topic of the self-centered/self-worship lifestyle already in this thread somewhere. It might be in the thread that originally spawned this one though.

[edit on 11/21/2008 by defcon5]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 01:33 PM by defcon5
reply to post by jd140


A normal King James Version in Esword.
You can get a copy here, with all the bibles you could ever want to download for free:
E-Sword


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 01:34 PM by americandingbat
Originally posted by defcon5
Race is something that someone is born into, its not something that someone chooses to engage in. Apples and oranges. Heck I am discriminated against because I chose to smoke, but I accept that my choice to do that has certain ramifications and stigmas attached to it, if I chose to continue doing it. Are you going to say that I am oppressed the same as the African Americans are?


The thing is that there is lots of evidence that homosexuality (as in, being attracted to someone of the same sex) is also something that you are born into. It is not something you choose. It is definitely not something you choose when you are an adult legally responsible for your choices.

They choose to have relationships, just as we heterosexuals choose to have relationships. I might like to be married someday, but I don't believe in God. Is that a problem?

You may be right that the legal system has no business trying to decide who can and can't marry – then we should remove all mention of marriage from the civil institutions and leave only civil unions for all couples, homosexual or heterosexual. And let each individual church, synagogue, etcetera decide on their own whether gays can marry under their auspices.

Gays aren't looking to get married in your church – they are looking to get married in civil services or in churches that accept them. That should be their right, if it is my right as an agnostic to marry.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 01:46 PM by psychedeliack
Originally posted by Ian McLean
reply to
post by Solomons


Originally posted by Solomons
Religion works on the premise if you tell a lie long enough and loud enough people will start to believe it.I think thats why christians etc keep repeating themselves over and over and over again in threads...just my two shiny pennies.

Almost but not quite true.

Religious practice works on the premise that if you get people to believe in an instantiation of a symbolic system of interpretation, they will cast their actions within a scope that fits within that system. A believing Christian, for example, is always looking to see how their life matches the path of Christ, and that quest causes their actions to both reenforce within themselves that symbolic significance, and makes actions undertaken more likely to fit within and reenforce a Christian worldview, to others externally perceiving. Hence, our illustrious President GWB casts his actions as a battle of 'good versus evil', and Christian congregations feel more content that what they believe is 'right'.

Since so much human soul-searching is spent within these definitions, and personal (though, perhaps, misguided) revelation is often honestly found, who is to say it is a 'lie'?

Truth, beyond undeniable objective fact, is a subjective quantity. At worst, it is an example of illusion, and not a lie, to claim that religious belief is 'false'.


Edit: to add quote to avoid ambiguity.
Edit 2: to water down, slightly, my vehemence, in pursuit of truth.


[edit on 21-11-2008 by Ian McLean]


Brilliant! Bravo! Bravo! Seriously, if this was explained to the whole world, we could all worship in peace, acknowledging that our beliefs systems are just that, belief systems. We invented them in the first place because we knew enough about how the mind works, in order to make various maps to realization re-connection, and divine experience. Some have been diluted and some not, but all are fully functional, and true in their own right.

"It doesnt matter how you seek god, just respect the ways of others, and make sure you find it"-Reality


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 02:01 PM by Bombeni
reply to post by defcon5



Awesome awesome post defcon5. You really nailed it. I am weary of people making these broad brushstrokes that Christians are paranoid homophobes. And honestly, I have read a lot of the threads here and don't see this overt thing that Christians accuse others of hating Christ? However I must point out that there are some here that make it a point to say really tacky blasphemous things about Him, a guy who never laid a stone in anyone's path.

True Christians don't hate homosexuals. Some people seem to confuse 2.1 billion people (one-third of the world population) with a few fringe religious fanatics who stand on the curb with homemade signs; you can usually identify these types readily by the shoprag hanging out of their gas tanks. Real Christians aren't about that; they are handing a few dollars to the beggar at the intersection (and letting God be his judge); they are standing in soup lines serving hungry people; they are wiping the sweat from their brow in jungle villages as they dig wells for fresh water, or innoculate babies, or nurse the sick. They are reading to the AIDS patients at a hospice, or writing letters for them, or just helping them with personal business that they are too sick to take care of themselves; they are flying their own planes using their own gas on their own time to pick up kids in isolated areas and fly them to top hospitals, where top surgeons/doctors donate their services. The list of World Christian Charities is mind boggling, there are literally thousands. One that comes to mind is The Good Samaritans; they are ALL volunteer physicians and registered nurses who are available nearly everyday in most any city; they treat you as though you were royalty, even giving you any prescription medicine you may need. They have a prayer counselor who also prays for you to find peace, comfort and wellness. (Some would call that religious indoctrination, sadly.) Now, certainly it isn't only Christians who do these things, but I would venture to say that if every Christian suddenly vanished from the earth, it wouldn't be a very nice place to be anymore. But I know, that idea just brought a smile to lots of ATS member faces.

That's my two cents worth.

[edit on 21-11-2008 by Bombeni]



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 03:20 PM by dariousg
reply to post by defcon5



I fear you have, as many christians do, taken the statement completely out of context. Ghandi was NOT saying that he did not like ALL CHRISTIANS. Just the ones that DID NOT ACT CHRIST LIKE! Period. End of the whole rant and discussion you just so thoughtfully put together.

You see? This is the problem. Christians (I being a former established church Christian but now one who believes that the message Christ put out there is the best thing about Christianity and NOT THE CHURCH ITSELF) like to jump to quick conclusions. I notice this action to this very day. Any time some statement in the Bible or some event is questioned the 'wall' goes up. My friends and family become irate and irritated. They are absolutely stunned that I simply can't swallow what they are saying all on 'FAITH ALONE' instead of my own personal interpretation.

So, once again, a Christian has jumped to the wrong conclusion about a statement. Though it was a nice little speech, I must sadly say it was misguided.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



"God is an Imaginary Friend" Athiest Billboards in Denver-
  Posted 19 days ago with 31 member flags
Why are these 10 figures just like Jesus Christ??
  Posted 6 days ago with 14 member flags
I am an imposter in Church
  Posted 5 days ago with 11 member flags
What Kind of Christianity Is This?
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
The Great Flood Was Caused By A Comet?
  Posted 12 days ago with 7 member flags
Advert claiming cure through prayer is banned
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
The real Jewish people. Torah Jews Against ZIONISM
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags