GOP Congressman: 'It Is Not Your Money', page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 32 times


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 11:48 PM by Evisscerator
reply to post by Keyhole



Cavuto is funny. Quote "Its our Money"! No Neill, its not OUR MONEY, its the FEDERAL RESERVE's Money. If it was OUR MONEY, the US TREASURY would have CREATED IT backed by GOLD and SILVER. By the way, FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES are FIAT MONEY (money without value or a debt instrument).

As far as the Auto Company Bail-Out goes, LET THEM FILE FOR CHAPTER 11 bankruptcy. If they break the UNION contracts, they can reduce the cost in producing CARS and PICKUPS and become PROFITABLE again. Until then, they should go out of business.

By the Way, Toyota, Honda and other Asian car manufacturers in this country are not members of the AUTO UNIONS, and they are doing just fine.



[edit on 11/20/2008 by Evisscerator]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 01:09 AM by cognoscente
The public has too great a vested interest in the affairs of our governance. It is constantly encroaching. The fact that we even distinguish the two is naive. In the end we comprise the same political union. Our tasks are differentiated, yes, but all parts are necessary and all parts must act distinctly. As soon as we decide to give up our power in the form of elected representatives we acknowledge that we will stay our hand, and in return we are given the privilege to enjoy our lives as we please, with music, entertainment, vacations, and the ability to pursue our own careers and life paths.

That interview was a clear misunderstanding. It was clearly just an issue of a generational gap in common knowledge. My god, has everyone forgotten the lessons of Plato? Has anyone even read him? If you haven't then you really don't deserve the respect of tolerance to your freedom of speech you so amply profess. You should be ashamed to be a part of this democratic country and yet be so ignorant of the entire concept.

Public hands in the domain of governance is a bad thing. Let them do with our taxes as they see fit. They are trained. They are more capable then you are. In fact, most of the time the public is the problem; not the other way around. We're fooling ourselves because of two basic misconstructions. Politicians aren't intrinsically corrupt. We corrupt our politicians for personal gain. Politicians aren't incompetent. But they are obligated, by social contract, to adhere the masses of the conflicting hypocrisies of its constituents' interests.

Our groveling hands are way too deep. However, I do disagree with the interviewee. The government should be smart enough to realize that we can't continue to bail out public interests. That's why we have politicians; so they can do what we would have otherwise done had we not been fully engaged in the trivialities of everyday life. But then again, the interviewer was being completely arrogant by asserting that that money was his money, was "our" money. He didn't need to be a such an ass. The interviewer basically insulted that politician's competence. You must have expected the answer to be fairly brash. And although it lacked foresight, it wasn't entirely wrong, and neither was it arrogant. A bit naive yes, but not arrogant.

In summary, you can obviously tell that he didn't really mean when he said "It isn't your money". It was an issue of generational dissidence, and a rather upset politician being told he's incapable of doing his job and retorting with a cynical remark.

[edit on 21-11-2008 by cognoscente]


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 04:45 AM by Britguy
reply to post by cognoscente



Politicians are not corrupt or incompetent? I beg to differ.

I came to the conclusion many years ago that the reason these people choose careers in local or national government is that they are a) out for themselves, b) control freaks, and c) they would not last 6 months in the private sector where there's oversight of their actions and real consequences.

We do not get to decide who governs us. We are instead given a choice of carefully selected candidates, groomed for positions by the back room boys and big corporate interests. These candidates know who they can and cannot piss off if they make the halls of power and so we get a "bought" leader whichever way we vote at the booth.
These leeches in power have no bounds to their arrogance and we, the people who pay them, are treated as nothing more than a cash source and fodder to fight their wars of conquest, on behalf of the corporate interests they they owe their power to, and to whom they must answer.

In the recent US elections, both parties made such a big issue about change, yet are still surrounded by the same old faces that have caused so much strife and suffering for the last few decades, and got us all into this nice little financial mess. How is that change?

At least in a dictatorship you know you are gonna get screwed so don't have to listen to these liars telling you how great things will be if you elect them.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 05:46 AM by detachedindividual
This doesn't surprise me at all.

Not only are the CEO's and bankers refusing to accept responsibility for the mess they've caused, the leaders approving the money to help them out are doing little to account for the relief they're giving. They obviously have little regard for the taxpaying public, they see this as their personal piggy bank.

The RBS in Scotland apologized to customers and shareholders for being in the position they are now in. They realized they made some terrible decisions.

In my view, if these companies and banks really wanted to survive, they'd beg and plead for help, while apologizing to the public, and CLEARLY stating what they intend to do.
As it is, they are asking for this money, directly threatening the population with unemployment if they are not given it, all while refusing to take any blame or make any personal sacrifices.

Likewise, the PTB are agreeing to various things on behalf of the public without telling the public what they are agreeing to. They are treating you as a slave and your money as their personal investment fund.

Again, it all comes back to leaders thinking that they are above the law, and that they can do whatever they like. They've forgotten that they are employed directly by the people, that the people are not here to serve them.
And the people have allowed this ideal to develop without argument over the last ten years.

This is only going to get worse. I honestly think that these companies will sink with or without that money. Those responsible will be immune to investigation, they'll simply vanish with that money while the gov't refuses to answer any questions.

I don't know about the mathematics, but wouldn't that money be better spent supporting the people who paid it to their government than propping up millionaires who resolutely refuse to give up their jets and mansions?


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 02:11 PM by HunkaHunka
reply to post by Keyhole



Well after a call to the office of this congressman in Washington, it's obvious that what he meant to say (And I can't believe I'm defending a republican) was that it's not Cavutos money. That there are many other tax payers involved who have a say in it.


Let's not make mountains out of molehills.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 02:13 PM by Swatman
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to
post by Keyhole



Well after a call to the office of this congressman in Washington, it's obvious that what he meant to say (And I can't believe I'm defending a republican) was that it's not Cavutos money. That there are many other tax payers involved who have a say in it.


Let's not make mountains out of molehills.


nothing wrong about defending a republican my lad



reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 03:10 PM by Sestias
Originally posted by detachedindividual
This doesn't surprise me at all.

Not only are the CEO's and bankers refusing to accept responsibility for the mess they've caused, the leaders approving the money to help them out are doing little to account for the relief they're giving.
* * * * * * * * * *
In my view, if these companies and banks really wanted to survive, they'd beg and plead for help, while apologizing to the public, and CLEARLY stating what they intend to do.
As it is, they are asking for this money, directly threatening the population with unemployment if they are not given it, all while refusing to take any blame or make any personal sacrifices.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

I don't know about the mathematics, but wouldn't that money be better spent supporting the people who paid it to their government than propping up millionaires who resolutely refuse to give up their jets and mansions?


It's the "little people" who work for these companies that will suffer the most. Whether their employers go into chapter 11 bankruptcy or whether they are bailed out, management will do anything to break the back of the UAW. Yes, the union gets decent wages and pensions for its workers, but neither of these things are what is causing the automakers to go under. It's stupid and/or reckless decisions at the top. God forbid that shareholders and CEO's should suffer. The "fat cats"in management are clamoring for an end to the unions, but the truth is no company ever went broke because they treated their workers too well.

I don't agree that pensions should go in the event of a bailout. The auto workers have worked all their lives for them and they shouldn't be penalized.


reply posted on 21-11-2008 @ 03:40 PM by ZindoDoone
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to
post by Keyhole



Well after a call to the office of this congressman in Washington, it's obvious that what he meant to say (And I can't believe I'm defending a republican) was that it's not Cavutos money. That there are many other tax payers involved who have a say in it.


Let's not make mountains out of molehills.

That sounds more like the spin Dr.'s response than the truth. I watched Cavuto and it was alot more than just a misunderstanding. That Congress critter new exactly that he was refering to the Fed and those that are connected to it own our money.

Zindo
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags