reply to post by Stillresearchn911
Hi Stillresearchn911.
It's impossible for any independent citizen researcher to answer all the questions of what happened on 9/11 nor is it our responsibility.
It should be evident to intellectually honest, logical people that the official story does not add up as there are many questions in every aspect.
The burden of proof regarding 19 rag tag Muslim hijackers is on the authorities and they have failed to meet that burden.
All we should need to do as citizens is uncover one fatal anomaly in their story and the rest falls apart like a house of cards.
For instance.......if building 7 can be proven to be a controlled demolition.....9/11 is proven to be an inside job.
Period.
It is not required to explain what happened to the passengers of 77, or to the plane that allegedly crashed in Shanksville, or even exactly HOW they
pulled off the controlled demolitions in Manhattan.
One single piece of evidence proving building 7 was a controlled demo should lead to grand juries, congressional investigations, indictments, and a
moratorium on the fraudulent "war on terror".
We have proven how the plane in Arlington did not hit the building. This is evident for a lot of reasons but primarily because all of the witnesses
in the area unanimously place it on the north side of the citgo making it impossible to be what caused the physical damage.
This simple fact alone is enough to prove 9/11 was an inside job without any other questions being answered. Do we want them all answered?
Of course!
But that will not happen without indictments and it's likely not to happen then either.
But we did not set out to prove a "flyover theory".
We simply embarked on an independent investigation to find out where people saw the plane.
They saw it on the north side which automatically proves a flyover.
This was not our idea. It was not our goal and it was not our theory.
It's simply what got uncovered and we see it as the most vulnerable part of the 9/11 deception and therefore the most important point we should be
focusing on.
Building 7 is important but it's gone and the entire controlled demo discussion has been reduced to a scientific debate where they trot out a dozen
"experts" for every expert that speaks out questioning the collapses.
The discussion has been effectively neutralized.
This can not be done with the north side evidence.
Not a single pilot, engineer, physicist, rationalist, or intellectually honest person would logically try to argue that a plane on the north side as
reported by all the witnesses could be what caused the physical damage.
Hope that helps.
[edit on 25-11-2008 by Craig Ranke CIT]
