posted by Stillresearchn911
Yes. I believe it is possible based off viewing the map CIT shows us in his OP that the flight very well could have flew the NOC and still hit the
Pentagon causing all known damages.
No one here knows for sure how fast F77 was really going, maybe it was going a lot slower on its approach than we are told.
I still however, am convinced that the wits must be wrong. Eye witness testimony is notoriously wrong after the fact, especially 6
and 7 years after the fact. So until CIT can come up with some hard evidence I have to believe the plane flew SOC.
Like I have said before CIT, you dont even have enough to take to a grand jury right now, let alone a jury of your peers.
I do wish you the best though to your mission, I always give you guys the benefit of the doubt and watch and read your posted info. I would love to
see you guys find the so called smoking gun but I think your barking up the wrong tree here.
The wits must be wrong? Not are wrong. Not were proven wrong? Not the wits are a pack of liars?
Must be? That sounds like a prayer. Please please let them be wrong.
The wits are usually wrong
especially 6 and 7 years after the fact? The ANC eyewitnesses were interviewed way back in 2001 right after 9-11 by
the Center for Military History, their interviews censored, released with names redacted in 2008 by FOIA, and CIT still tracked them down and
reinterviewed them.
Why do you think they were censored and names and personal information STILL redacted afer a judge ordered their release? Perhaps SOMEBODY had
reason to fear their eyewitness accounts?
Guess what?
Their eyewitness accounts did not change over a seven year timespan. Of course CIT did a much finer job of interviewing with video
cameras and on original site questioning with a model plane for demonstration purposes and maps to draw what they thought the flight path was to their
best judgement. So you are quite mistaken about these particular witnesses, aren't you?
The aircraft flew straight at them from above the Naval Annex, flew essentially over their heads, and towards the Pentagon in the distance, where
there was an explosion. What is so difficult to determine about a low-flying large aircraft flying straight at you and over your heads?
These guys are just ordinary honest working people who just want to tell the truth as they saw it. Correct?
As to the damage pattern, how do you explain how this ONA and NOC aircraft could knock down light poles it was too far north of and somehow
miraculously and suddenly change the inertia of 90 tons of aircraft at impact to conform to the actual damage pattern inside the Pentagon 1st floor?
That looks like about a sudden 15-20 degree jog to the left.
What kind of physics laws has this 9-11 INSIDE JOB set aside this time? That
nonsense is not even remotely possible. That 90 tons of aircraft would have continued along its impact trajectory, creating a completely different
damage pattern inside the Pentagon. But the existing impact trajectory is what we are stuck with, isn't it? It has to be along the Official south
Flight 77 flight path through the light poles and generator trailer and internal damage path. Correct? That did not happen did it?
Therefore an aircraft did not impact the Pentagon. Nothing knocked down the light poles because they were staged. A light pole was not knocked into a
taxi windshield because it was staged too. Correct? Nothing impacted the generator trailer because it too was staged. Explosives accomplished the
destruction and planned murders inside the Pentagon because Flight 77 was simulated. Correct?
[edit on 11/22/08 by SPreston]
