Alien abduction news coverage, page 1

Read this article and watch the video. Watch it all the way to the end because the most shocking part is at the very end. This has to be one of the best pieces of UFO/ET journalism I've seen. Very open minded and lengthy. Part two is going to be posted tonight.

www.kltv.com...

[edit on 20-11-2008 by ufo reality]

reply to post by ufo reality

---

The shocking part is that she seems sincere? Can I EVER get a straight answer from someone on here? I am honestly asking you what the shocking part is, I didn't catch it.

reply to post by Zenagain

---

Uh, that she might have a hybrid baby inside of her. *facepalm*

reply to post by ufo reality

---

Has the second video been released yet?

I couldn't seem to find it.

reply to post by Chadwickus

---

No, not yet.

reply to post by ufo reality

---

Well it's not particularly mind blowing then, besides her story isn't adding up already. She said 5 beings carried her away, yet she's drawn 6.
Then one apparently speaks to her out of that 5 and shows a pic of it..in yellow, when the previous drawing is showing they're wearing purple hoodies and black boots. (lol)

I doubt the second vid will improve it.





[edit on 20-11-2008 by Chadwickus]

reply to post by ufo reality

---

I watched the video…and it’s interesting but hardly mind-blowing, even the “revelation” at the end.

Mrs Nelms’ account is a fairly standard version of an alien abduction. There isn’t anything in it that we haven’t really heard of before. As to her veracity; nobody can truly tell if she’s deluding herself (because of the problems her and her husband are/were having as alluded to in the video), genuinely abused (as in the whole account is real) or a good, old fashioned attention seeker (that’ll bear out if she suddenly becomes a “channeler” and writes a best-seller).

At the end of the day, it’s down to two people as to the reality of her story; Jane Nelms heself, and you (the viewer) as you watch her story. But it is dangerous to simply accept everything she says as truth before the entire story is told. Yes, she’s produced “evidence”, but then again drawings are completely inadmissible. (Is it just me, but didn’t she say she was abducted by five hooded aliens, but in her representation there are six. Consistency, Mrs Nelms, consistency.)

In her defence, the photographs she took of “fingerprints” are a nice, and refreshing, addition to this type of scenario. And the imprint of the alien on her window:

This alien was in a fetal position as it tumbled through the window. Through solid material...here's his head and his eye socket and this is one hand here and another hand here. It's hard to see. See the cranium...it's almost like an x-ray

makes for an interesting, and as far as I know original, perspective on the story.

On a personal note, her mention of the alien having assumed a “fetal” position as it entered her house strikes an uncomfortably familiar chord in regard to a thread of my own, wherein I “experienced” (in the broadest sense of the word) a vision of an alien crouching fetaly by my bedroom window…

reply to post by Beamish

---

The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.

reply to post by Zenagain

---

Believe me, I wasn’t defending her story.

But then again, if, by the remotest possibility, she is telling the truth, then who’s to know the mechanics and physical rules of passing through solid matter? There may well be residual imprints left behind by a (supposed) flesh and blood creature passing through what at the end of the day is the thinnest part of a wall.

And I have to agree that her finding a concussed Grey moaning and lolling dazedly on her bedroom shag-pile in the ruins of her double glazing would make for a great story. But it’d be kind of embarrassing for her would-be abductor, wouldn’t it?




[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]

[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]

Originally posted by Zenagain
reply to post by Beamish

---

The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.

perhaps I mis-read the account, but I believe it says one left fingerprints on her car, not on the bedroom window, prints that she dusted and photographed.

op, interesting find, but after all the reports from different abductees, mrs. nelms relating she has a hybrid child really isn't shocking to any of us that are interested in this particular area.

just my 2 cents.

seeker

reply to post by the seeker_713g

---

I don't think it's made clear where these "prints" were found. She does mention her car in relation with the "visitations", but there is no follow up explanation as to what relevance this has. Perhaps part two will clarify the issue.

Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags

Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags

UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags

The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags

The Edge of Reality - Updated Report on the Illinois Police UFO case, January 5th, 2000.
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags

The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Famous Argentinean painter observed UFO studying parabolic antennas
  Posted 19 days ago with 21 member flags

1/28/2012 craft in sky From Puerto Rico - Need help getting more info!!
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: