|
|
Topic started on 20-11-2008 @ 07:04 AM by ufo reality
|
Read this article and watch the video. Watch it all the way to the end because the most shocking part is at the very end. This has to be one of the
best pieces of UFO/ET journalism I've seen. Very open minded and lengthy. Part two is going to be posted tonight.
www.kltv.com...
[edit on 20-11-2008 by ufo reality]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Aliens and UFOs topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:24 AM by Zenagain
|
Ok. Watched it.....what is the "shocking part"? She looks like your typical old, crazy there but for the grace of God go I type looking for some
attention. I imagine kids in the neighborhood dare each other to go into her yard. My mind sir, is unblown.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:24 AM by ufo reality
|
She seems quite sincere to me. But that's just my opinion. I respect yours.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:29 AM by Zenagain
|
reply to post by ufo reality
The shocking part is that she seems sincere? Can I EVER get a straight answer from someone on here? I am honestly asking you what the shocking part
is, I didn't catch it.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:36 AM by ufo reality
|
reply to post by Zenagain
Uh, that she might have a hybrid baby inside of her. *facepalm*
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:37 AM by daniel815
|
I don't see what is shocking about this report. These kind of contacts are happening around the world and lately, even more frequently. Many times
using normal human form.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:37 AM by Zenagain
|
     
Then I'd advise her to head to the local clinic and get an ultrasound/cat scan/ or an Mri. But she won't, because it's utter bullpie.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:38 AM by Chadwickus
|
reply to post by ufo reality
Has the second video been released yet?
I couldn't seem to find it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:48 AM by Cristo
|
She is mental sick person,i feel sorry for her..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:54 AM by ufo reality
|
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:54 AM by ufo reality
|
Originally posted by Cristo
She is mental sick person,i feel sorry for her..
What makes you come to that conclusion?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:02 AM by InfaRedMan
|
Originally posted by ufo reality
What makes you come to that conclusion?
With all due respect ufo reality, what makes you not come to that conclusion?
As mentioned earlier, this could all be cleared up with an ultrasound or MRI wouldn't you imagine. That's a fairly logical assumption so why hasn't
she done it? What's the motive? What you you think - I'm interested to know
IRM
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:14 AM by Chadwickus
|
reply to post by ufo reality
Well it's not particularly mind blowing then, besides her story isn't adding up already. She said 5 beings carried her away, yet she's drawn 6.
Then one apparently speaks to her out of that 5 and shows a pic of it..in yellow, when the previous drawing is showing they're wearing purple hoodies
and black boots. (lol)
I doubt the second vid will improve it.
[edit on 20-11-2008 by Chadwickus]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:15 AM by HankMcCoy
|
Wasn't it stated that she has an alien CHILD, and not that she was still pregnant?
Maybe I missed something.
Edit:
I watched it again, it says she has a half alien/ half human child.
-Awesome-
[edit on 20-11-2008 by HankMcCoy]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:28 AM by Beamish
|
reply to post by ufo reality
I watched the video…and it’s interesting but hardly mind-blowing, even the “revelation” at the end.
Mrs Nelms’ account is a fairly standard version of an alien abduction. There isn’t anything in it that we haven’t really heard of before. As to
her veracity; nobody can truly tell if she’s deluding herself (because of the problems her and her husband are/were having as alluded to in the
video), genuinely abused (as in the whole account is real) or a good, old fashioned attention seeker (that’ll bear out if she suddenly becomes a
“channeler” and writes a best-seller).
At the end of the day, it’s down to two people as to the reality of her story; Jane Nelms heself, and you (the viewer) as you watch her
story. But it is dangerous to simply accept everything she says as truth before the entire story is told. Yes, she’s produced “evidence”, but
then again drawings are completely inadmissible. (Is it just me, but didn’t she say she was abducted by five hooded aliens, but in her
representation there are six. Consistency, Mrs Nelms, consistency.)
In her defence, the photographs she took of “fingerprints” are a nice, and refreshing, addition to this type of scenario. And the imprint of the
alien on her window:
This alien was in a fetal position as it tumbled through the window. Through solid material...here's his head and his eye socket and this is one
hand here and another hand here. It's hard to see. See the cranium...it's almost like an x-ray
makes for an interesting, and as far as I know original, perspective on the story.
On a personal note, her mention of the alien having assumed a “fetal” position as it entered her house strikes an uncomfortably familiar chord in
regard to a thread of my own, wherein I “experienced” (in the broadest sense of the word) a vision of an alien crouching fetaly by my
bedroom window…
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:42 AM by Zenagain
|

reply to post by Beamish
The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it
would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:52 AM by Beamish
|
reply to post by Zenagain
Believe me, I wasn’t defending her story.
But then again, if, by the remotest possibility, she is telling the truth, then who’s to know the mechanics and physical rules of passing
through solid matter? There may well be residual imprints left behind by a (supposed) flesh and blood creature passing through what at the end of the
day is the thinnest part of a wall.
And I have to agree that her finding a concussed Grey moaning and lolling dazedly on her bedroom shag-pile in the ruins of her double glazing would
make for a great story. But it’d be kind of embarrassing for her would-be abductor, wouldn’t it?
[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]
[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:02 AM by the seeker_713g
|
Originally posted by Zenagain
reply to post by Beamish
The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it
would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.
perhaps I mis-read the account, but I believe it says one left fingerprints on her car, not on the bedroom window, prints that she dusted and
photographed.
op, interesting find, but after all the reports from different abductees, mrs. nelms relating she has a hybrid child really isn't shocking to any of
us that are interested in this particular area.
just my 2 cents.
seeker
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:19 AM by Beamish
|
reply to post by the seeker_713g
I don't think it's made clear where these "prints" were found. She does mention her car in relation with the "visitations", but there is no
follow up explanation as to what relevance this has. Perhaps part two will clarify the issue.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:51 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |