AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aliens and UFOs discussion forum.  (rss)


Alien abduction news coverage


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 20-11-2008 @ 07:04 AM by ufo reality


Read this article and watch the video. Watch it all the way to the end because the most shocking part is at the very end. This has to be one of the best pieces of UFO/ET journalism I've seen. Very open minded and lengthy. Part two is going to be posted tonight.

www.kltv.com...

[edit on 20-11-2008 by ufo reality]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Aliens and UFOs topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:24 AM by Zenagain


Ok. Watched it.....what is the "shocking part"? She looks like your typical old, crazy there but for the grace of God go I type looking for some attention. I imagine kids in the neighborhood dare each other to go into her yard. My mind sir, is unblown.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:24 AM by ufo reality


She seems quite sincere to me. But that's just my opinion. I respect yours.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:29 AM by Zenagain


reply to post by ufo reality



The shocking part is that she seems sincere? Can I EVER get a straight answer from someone on here? I am honestly asking you what the shocking part is, I didn't catch it.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:36 AM by ufo reality


reply to post by Zenagain



Uh, that she might have a hybrid baby inside of her. *facepalm*



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:37 AM by daniel815


I don't see what is shocking about this report. These kind of contacts are happening around the world and lately, even more frequently. Many times using normal human form.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:37 AM by Zenagain


Then I'd advise her to head to the local clinic and get an ultrasound/cat scan/ or an Mri. But she won't, because it's utter bullpie.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:38 AM by Chadwickus


reply to post by ufo reality



Has the second video been released yet?

I couldn't seem to find it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:48 AM by Cristo


She is mental sick person,i feel sorry for her..



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:54 AM by ufo reality


reply to post by Chadwickus



No, not yet.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 07:54 AM by ufo reality


Originally posted by Cristo
She is mental sick person,i feel sorry for her..


What makes you come to that conclusion?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:02 AM by InfaRedMan


Originally posted by ufo reality
What makes you come to that conclusion?


With all due respect ufo reality, what makes you not come to that conclusion?

As mentioned earlier, this could all be cleared up with an ultrasound or MRI wouldn't you imagine. That's a fairly logical assumption so why hasn't she done it? What's the motive? What you you think - I'm interested to know

IRM



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:14 AM by Chadwickus


reply to post by ufo reality



Well it's not particularly mind blowing then, besides her story isn't adding up already. She said 5 beings carried her away, yet she's drawn 6.
Then one apparently speaks to her out of that 5 and shows a pic of it..in yellow, when the previous drawing is showing they're wearing purple hoodies and black boots. (lol)

I doubt the second vid will improve it.





[edit on 20-11-2008 by Chadwickus]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:15 AM by HankMcCoy


Wasn't it stated that she has an alien CHILD, and not that she was still pregnant?

Maybe I missed something.

Edit:

I watched it again, it says she has a half alien/ half human child.

-Awesome-



[edit on 20-11-2008 by HankMcCoy]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:28 AM by Beamish


reply to post by ufo reality



I watched the video…and it’s interesting but hardly mind-blowing, even the “revelation” at the end.

Mrs Nelms’ account is a fairly standard version of an alien abduction. There isn’t anything in it that we haven’t really heard of before. As to her veracity; nobody can truly tell if she’s deluding herself (because of the problems her and her husband are/were having as alluded to in the video), genuinely abused (as in the whole account is real) or a good, old fashioned attention seeker (that’ll bear out if she suddenly becomes a “channeler” and writes a best-seller).

At the end of the day, it’s down to two people as to the reality of her story; Jane Nelms heself, and you (the viewer) as you watch her story. But it is dangerous to simply accept everything she says as truth before the entire story is told. Yes, she’s produced “evidence”, but then again drawings are completely inadmissible. (Is it just me, but didn’t she say she was abducted by five hooded aliens, but in her representation there are six. Consistency, Mrs Nelms, consistency.)

In her defence, the photographs she took of “fingerprints” are a nice, and refreshing, addition to this type of scenario. And the imprint of the alien on her window:

This alien was in a fetal position as it tumbled through the window. Through solid material...here's his head and his eye socket and this is one hand here and another hand here. It's hard to see. See the cranium...it's almost like an x-ray


makes for an interesting, and as far as I know original, perspective on the story.

On a personal note, her mention of the alien having assumed a “fetal” position as it entered her house strikes an uncomfortably familiar chord in regard to a thread of my own, wherein I “experienced” (in the broadest sense of the word) a vision of an alien crouching fetaly by my bedroom window…



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:42 AM by Zenagain


reply to post by Beamish



The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 08:52 AM by Beamish


reply to post by Zenagain



Believe me, I wasn’t defending her story.

But then again, if, by the remotest possibility, she is telling the truth, then who’s to know the mechanics and physical rules of passing through solid matter? There may well be residual imprints left behind by a (supposed) flesh and blood creature passing through what at the end of the day is the thinnest part of a wall.

And I have to agree that her finding a concussed Grey moaning and lolling dazedly on her bedroom shag-pile in the ruins of her double glazing would make for a great story. But it’d be kind of embarrassing for her would-be abductor, wouldn’t it?




[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]

[edit on 20-11-2008 by Beamish]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:02 AM by the seeker_713g


Originally posted by Zenagain
reply to post by Beamish



The alien"passed through solid matter" but still "left fingerprints and an imprint". Can't have it both ways lady. If it left an imprint, it would have either shattered through the glass or knocked itself out. Now THAT would be an interesting story.


perhaps I mis-read the account, but I believe it says one left fingerprints on her car, not on the bedroom window, prints that she dusted and photographed.

op, interesting find, but after all the reports from different abductees, mrs. nelms relating she has a hybrid child really isn't shocking to any of us that are interested in this particular area.

just my 2 cents.

seeker



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:19 AM by Beamish


reply to post by the seeker_713g



I don't think it's made clear where these "prints" were found. She does mention her car in relation with the "visitations", but there is no follow up explanation as to what relevance this has. Perhaps part two will clarify the issue.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 09:51 AM by Anonymous ATS





   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.118 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.