New friendly fire coverup: Army shreds files on dead soldiers, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 20-11-2008 @ 12:16 AM by schrodingers dog

New friendly fire coverup: Army shreds files on dead soldiers


www.salon.com
On Oct. 14, 2008, Salon published an article about the deaths of Army Pfc. Albert Nelson and Pfc. Roger Suarez. The Army attributed their deaths in Iraq in 2006 to enemy action; Salon's investigation, which included graphic battle video and eyewitness testimony, indicated that their deaths were likely due to friendly fire.

After Salon published Benjamin's Oct. 14 report, the Army ordered soldiers to shred documents about the men. As proof that they were ordered to destroy the paperwork...
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 12:35 PM by schrodingers dog
I just wanted to give a sense of the crime commited.

But for their superior officers, the publication of the article was a problem to be solved. On the morning of Oct. 14, battalion leaders held an emergency meeting in response to the Salon article. The sergeant in charge of 2nd Platoon, Nelson and Suarez's platoon, had a pointed confrontation with at least one of his men in a vain search for the source that leaked the Ramadi video to Salon. Soldiers were told to keep quiet from then on.

continued...

Staff Sgt. Swinton was in charge that night. He told Kremling, Mitchum and a third soldier who had reported for duty that the evening's labor would include the inglorious task of cleaning out a closet. The first priority, Swinton said, was to shred the thousands of pages of documents in two large copy-paper-size boxes. It would be tedious work, but Swinton was adamant. "He says, 'I need that paper shredded. That has to be done tonight,'" remembered Kremling, who volunteered to get started on the job.

At first, the men tried to avoid the monotony of shredding. "We are talking about two Xerox boxes — filled," Kremling told me later. But eventually Kremling told the other two, "I'll go do it."

Kremling stepped into a quiet office with the boxes of documents and the shredder. Kremling lifted handfuls of paper out of the first box and stuffed the material into the machine. It hummed to life, chopping away.

"People go to jail for this kind of s**t"


Hopefully people will!




[edit on 11/20/2008 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 01:33 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by marg6043



It seems that, as per usual, the truth is in the hands of courageous soldiers who are willing to come forth, the rare true investigative journalist, and one of the few representatives we have who are willing to stand up for what is right. These elements rarely come together. It is disgraceful that even now the MSM has failed to report this story. Apparently the "you're only reporting bad news" campaign of media intimidation has been effective.


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 04:13 PM by angel of lightangelo
reply to post by jerico65



I gess you need to read up a little.

Anyway, this is about covering up your actions. That is being a coward. You messed up, you shot a fellow, and the brave thing to do is to blame it on the enemy and cover it up?
The Army attributed their deaths in Iraq in 2006 to enemy action
This is what you want to stick up for, OK. But "friendly fire" Begs a deeper issue anyway....

Pat Tilman anyone?

How about the soldiers murdered on base.
How many soldiers are accidentally shot in the head on base or in the green zone one time? How often does that fit your little scenario?

The point here is murder being covered up as friendly fire. Or do you not care enough to look beyond whatever BS Hannity tells you?

A small tight grouping in the head at point blank range with no combat fire happening. Hmmm....I didn't think it sounded friendly.

Sorry pal but you are actually talking about friendly fire. I am talking about cowards that murder their brothers and then try to get away with it by MAKING IT LOOK LIKE FRIENDLY FIRE.

Try reading more than your own posts some time.

[edit on 20-11-2008 by angel of lightangelo]

[edit on 20-11-2008 by angel of lightangelo]


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 05:51 PM by angel of lightangelo
reply to post by jerico65



My first response was to the story of soldier killed by friendly fire and it was covered up. That is cowardly and wrong. The covering up. I responded to that how I felt. You felt compelled to push the point by asking if I knew what friendly fire meant. And my response is more "friendly fire" killings. It is happening for different reasons. Is it really friendly fire? Ok, then why cover it up? OK it is, and you did, and you deserve what for that? Sorry if I get upset over the idea that friendly fire is covered up by men that are supposed to be the best and bravest. That bothers me. And when someone calls me out for having a human response to it, I go on....Murder! There are murders, There have been all kinds of cases of covered up "friendly fire" that turned out to be small close groupings of shots to the head, some on base, some in the green zone, and most without any enemy fire to report at all. So yes, I went off topic because you pushed me there. No, you will not find this stuff in the OP. You will also not find what you said in the OP so we both lose but this is a public forum and if my posting an honest human reaction pisses you off, perhaps you would like to do something about my freedom to do so?

[edit on 20-11-2008 by angel of lightangelo]


reply posted on 20-11-2008 @ 10:23 PM by jerico65
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
I believe that is what I said before I was derailed by someone claiming my response was somehow incorrect.


Here's your initial post:

This just makes me so sick. Everytime I hear a story like this, I cannot help but wonder what these killers are in the military for. How does love for your country drive you to cowardly kill a fellow and cover it up.

OK, now, explain the sentence "...wonder what these killers are in the military for."? You mean the "killers" in the tank that accidentally fired on their own troops? How does this make them "killers"? Do you think that they are probably upset over the friendly fire incident? Contrary to what you think with your limited military knowledge, US troops are looking to shoot up their own guys just for fun.

Or are you calling the men that ordered the destruction of the records "killers"? How are they killers? (Well, they probably killed an entire forest of trees with the paper they used!) They are wrong for destroying the records of the investigation, and I do wonder why they went about it. It's not like there has never been a friendly fire incident in US military history. They should understand by now that covering up things like this never work out.

This links to your other sentence "....cowardly kill a fellow and cover it up". OK, once again, the tankers didn't "cowardly" kill these guys. I'll bet any amount of your paycheck that the tank gunner wasn't looking thru his sights and calling the TC and saying, "Hey, boss, I see some of our own guys in that building. Let's fire them up for yucks!!"

OK, any other questions?

Other than the Tillman goat-rope, I really didn't find much on friendly fire coverups.

[edit on 20-11-2008 by jerico65]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags