Nine Nukes Exploded under Artic Ocean Nov. 17th and 18th!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 22-11-2008 @ 02:34 AM by plumranch

that HAARP is something far more sinister than it is. You can even tour the premises if you want. It's not even run by the US government anymore, but BAE.
reply to
post by dave420



I think that HAARP is a powerful instrument to tweek the ionosphere and not much more. However, there is conjuncture that HAARP can be used for other purposes. See: Analysis: HAARP which discusses the capabilities of HAARP regarding weather, weapon control, earthquakes and mind control.



reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 04:48 PM by KathyT
Well, it is a fact that “something” caused a “quake-like” event to be recorded on seismographs. Here they are:
US Geological Survey maps here:
neic.usgs.gov...

Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events.

There are other kinds of strong bombs that aren’t necessarily nuclear.

It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one in Calif.... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. I've experienced quite a few 3.0+ shakes, and one or two 4.0+ quakes in 50+ years, and only one 5.0+ earthquake in my whole lifetime. A 5.0+ quake is quite shakey, I saw pickup trucks bouncing 3 feet off the ground in the one I experienced, and telephone poles swaying 10 feet across in the air. Additionally, that area in the Artic is NOT an active fault line, to my knowledge.

Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES.

Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory.


reply posted on 1-12-2008 @ 08:25 PM by optyk phyba
reply to post by questioningall



its complete bunk.
100 kilotonne nuke burried in the ground will vaporise an area to an approximate diameter of 1,600 meters. (anyone who has seen the chinese or american videos of their underground tests would know this)
9 nukes, each one 50 times more powerful, burried at the suppossed depth of 6 miles would create massive shockwaves and tidal waves from the BIG holes that were just punched in the earth and the ocean rushing in.

watch this video for an example
www.maniacworld.com...

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags