Nine Nukes Exploded under Artic Ocean Nov. 17th and 18th!

page: 1
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:31 PM
link   

Nine Nukes Exploded under Artic Ocean Nov. 17th and 18th!


educate-yourself.org

Checking IRIS WILBER system of seismographic readings I was able to see the distinctive peaks of underground nuclear explosions. No small tremors leading to the major event and few if any aftershocks. The area is seismically stable. None of the blasts appeared to trigger sympathetic tremors. The explosions were concentrated in an area about 16 kilometers by 16 kilometers (10 miles by 10 miles). The explosions were in the 5 to 10 Megaton range. All were 10 kilometers deep (6.2 miles). There is a possibility that the Department of Energy working with the oil companies and the Department of Defence, the likely culprits, were attempting to shift the North Magnetic Pole. Checking my compass I have not seen any shifts during the past few days. The flipping of the magnetic poles is happening as the field strength of the Earth is half of what is was centuries ago. There are other disturbances in the Earth's magnetic field indicating change is coming. Were they trying to accelerate the flipping of the poles? Were they trying to cause such calamity that martial law would be imposed? Were they trying to kill five to six billion people?



(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:31 PM
link   
This is more than just OUTRAGEOUS!!! What is the government doing?? We will never hear about this on MSM! The public needs to know now!
I know what the government has been doing with the banks and taking all of our money. Also I did confirm with some farmers - the banks are not giving them credit to plant food, so the government will also be starving us next year!
BUT to nuke the Artic - as the article says - or they trying to make the magnetic poles shift or an Earthquake? Webbot has predicted a quake Dec. 10th - 12th for the Pacific - will these nukes eventually cause it?

The Illumanati, Elite and the U.S. government is completely NUTS!!

Read the article the man is a seismologist - he saw the nukes go off on his monitor.


educate-yourself.org
(visit the link for the full news article)

UPDATE: From site:
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 5.7
Date-Time Monday, November 17, 2008 at 12:55:23 UTC
Monday, November 17, 2008 at 04:55:23 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 79.656°N, 116.072°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region ARCTIC OCEAN
Distances 390 km (240 miles) N of Mould Bay, Northwest Territories, Canada
755 km (470 miles) NNW of Resolute, Nunavut, Canada
1920 km (1190 miles) N of YELLOWKNIFE, NW Territories, Canada
2310 km (1430 miles) NNW of IQALUIT, Nunavut, Canada

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 4.1 km (2.5 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters NST=212, Nph=212, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=0.99 sec, Gp= 29°,
M-type=regional moment magnitude (Mw), Version=A
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Event ID us2008zmbd

This confirmed at least one of them - I believe this - he has the times and the latitude and longitude.

I found the others listed on the site above from the government - here is a listing of some of the Earthquakes on the 18th:
MAP 4.7 2008/11/18 07:05:13 79.776 -114.689 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN

MAP 3.7 2008/11/18 05:39:24 54.339 -161.491 11.9 ALASKA PENINSULA
MAP 4.8 2008/11/18 05:37:28 79.733 -114.958 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 3.0 2008/11/18 05:04:18 18.893 -66.416 104.5 PUERTO RICO REGION
MAP 5.3 2008/11/18 04:52:52 79.747 -115.310 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 3.3 2008/11/18 04:52:08 54.525 -163.402 1.2 UNIMAK ISLAND REGION, ALASKA
MAP 5.1 2008/11/18 04:10:36 79.763 -115.704 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 5.6 2008/11/18 03:59:49 79.681 -115.326 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 4.5 2008/11/18 01:38:52 13.795 -88.724 184.7 EL SALVADOR
MAP 5.0 2008/11/18 00:58:00 12.337 -88.053 65.7 NEAR THE COAST OF NICARAGUA
MAP 3.1 2008/11/18 00:17:47 56.662 -158.507 71.8 ALASKA PENINSULA

Here is the list from the govt. site of some of the quakes from the 17th
MAP 4.7 2008/11/17 17:17:05 79.697 -115.448 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 2.7 2008/11/17 16:23:58 36.013 -120.885 6.7 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
MAP 2.6 2008/11/17 16:10:59 40.734 -125.466 23.2 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
MAP 3.5 2008/11/17 15:32:11 51.743 -173.776 35.5 ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS., ALASKA
MAP 3.6 2008/11/17 14:27:29 36.013 -120.877 12.1 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
MAP 2.5 2008/11/17 13:50:48 38.816 -122.769 1.2 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
MAP 5.1 2008/11/17 13:40:11 79.698 -115.453 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 4.7 2008/11/17 13:16:52 79.512 -115.585 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN
MAP 5.3 2008/11/17 13:16:35 -16.823 171.989 37.8 VANUATU REGION
MAP 5.7 2008/11/17 12:55:23 79.656 -116.072 10.0 ARCTIC OCEAN


Notice anything?? ARTIC IS THERE 9 TIMES! Listed as moment quakes
YEAH IT DID HAPPEN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



[edit on 19-11-2008 by questioningall]

[edit on 19-11-2008 by questioningall]



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 

He is not a "seismologist," he is a new-age kook:


Laying a healing on the waters and the natural kingdoms will set up protection for you. It will make it difficult for the negative to UFO to stay in your area. People will be miraculously healed, even years later. Make the healing as universal as possible and you will witness surprises. Water is a battery which keeps its charge for a long time.

Which gem-room is the center for pHARMa bio plagues? The largest one for plagues was over south China, but that one is gone. That is why there have not been too many new plagues. My intuition says Iceland but then Cape Verde Islands, and other islands along the mid-ocean ridges spring to mind. There are three etheric zones over the Sahara. Ahaggar Mountains in southern Algeria, the Tibesti Mountains in northern Chad and the mountains of western Sudan are ancient Hot Spots. These areas have been misused. Increased desertification of sub-Saharan plus the use of pHARMa bio-plagues throughout central Africa points towards these three zones as problematic, as their arcs of influence take in most of infected Africa.

It took me 22 years of training before I was strong enough to successfully attack into the lower astral realms in 1992. In 1987 I attempted but was repulsed. That led to voodoo-like attacks for a long time.

I would recommend your working with healing intent first individually or in small groups. Practise with the powerwand on water and without the powerwand. Go at your own speed following inner guidance. With the healing intent that you have already established you will soon break the connection to the UFO that has been bothering you.

Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone

© Copyright 2002-2004 Educate-Yourself.org All Rights Reserved.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by questioningall

Read the article the man is a seismologist

I seriously doubt it. "Sympathetic tremors"?! Really?
Is this so-called "expert" the only source for this?



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:45 PM
link   
maybe they are trying to blast open an entrance to hollow earth. That cant be good for the biology out there, I dont know what kind of fish and stuff are in that part of the sea, but I imagine the shock waves of a nuclear blast under water would kill or damage many animals. I bet whales all over the world heard the explosions, granted its true.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Exactly were did these people get this information about nukes exploding? Did they see it? Were they given secret faxes by the military?

It appears that all they have to go on is a bunch of earthquake figures. And the circumstantial evidence that there are a bunch of countries patroling the arctic to claim portions for themselves.

How does that bring one to the conclusion that someone is nuking the arctic?



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:49 PM
link   
Nine nukes, of that yield, detonated in the Arctic would've been noticed by folks not just in the vicinity but much further afield too. The Northern Lights would've been lit up like a Christmas Tree & radiation detectors in Europe, Canada etc would've been going off the gauge.

MSM isn't reporting it because it didn't happen. Simple as.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:51 PM
link   
maybe it was HAARP activity, isnt there some theory floating around about HAARP causing earthquakes? That would actually be more believable than the nuke idea. Thats a lot of nukes. Id expect to see lots of dead beached whales if it were 9 nukes, who knows.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 05:57 PM
link   
From the article:


None of the blasts appeared to trigger sympathetic tremors.

So, I guess we're ok then? Nothing to worry about? Would there be more reason for concern if the blasts had triggered "sympathetic tremors"?



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 



I'll try to check this with the Geological Survey folks in Menlo Park, California.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours

By Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone
educate-yourself.org...
November 18, 2008

Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours by ZS Livingstone (Nov. 19, 2008)

On November 17 and 18, 2008 nine H-Bombs were exploded below the Arctic Ocean near the North Magnetic Pole. I was unable to transfer this info from the IRIS Seismic Monitor, so I copied this information longhand and typed it back onto my computer.

DATE TIME LATITUDE LONGITUDE MAGNITUDE DEPTH (Kilometers)

17 Nov 2008 12:55:23 UT 79.66 -116.86 5.7 10.0
17 Nov 2008 13:16:51 79.70 -115.78 4.7 10.0
17 Nov 2008 13:40:11 79.70 -115.36 5.1 10.0
17 Nov 2008 17:17:05 79.70 -115.78 4.7 10.0
18 Nov 2008 03:59:49 79.61 -114.76 5.6 10.0
18 Nov 2008 04:10:35 79.76 -115.70 5.1 10.0
18 Nov 2008 04:52:51 79.74 -115.32 5.3 10.0
18 Nov 2008 05:37:27 79.75 -115.33 4.9 10.0
18 Nov 2008 07:05:12 79.78 -114. 69 4.7 10.0

The North Magnetic Pole is about 80 degrees North and 104 degrees West and follows a circular 50 kilometer path each day. This area is north of Banks Island near the edge of the continental shelf and edging into the deeper waters of the Arctic Ocean. It is within Canadian waters.

Checking IRIS WILBER system of seismographic readings I was able to see the distinctive peaks of underground nuclear explosions. No small tremors leading to the major event and few if any aftershocks. The area is seismically stable. None of the blasts appeared to trigger sympathetic tremors. The explosions were concentrated in an area about 16 kilometers by 16 kilometers (10 miles by 10 miles). The explosions were in the 5 to 10 Megaton range. All were 10 kilometers deep (6.2 miles).



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by psychedeliack
maybe it was HAARP activity,That would actually be more believable than the nuke idea.


Very brilliant observation!



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:08 PM
link   
I thought HAARP too when I read 6.2 miles deep. Wasn't that the same depth of the Chinese quake earlier this year?



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:12 PM
link   
Im going to go ahead and say that this is FALSE. I know 100 percent that this is false. The North Korea test nuke was the last nuclear explosion that has happened on the entire planet.

If said nuke explosions had taken place, I would have known about it, and trust me, it did not happen.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Maybe Santa has gone nuclear. Just what we need, another dictator with his finger on the button.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 


Does anyone know how this technology works? Apparently the Russians used it to develope their deep oil and gas wells in Siberia.

Sounds like a pretty crude and inprecise way to produce petroleum!

From my small plane I once witnessed a massive release of natural gas from a nearby oil platform off the Kenai Peninsula. So much natural gas was escaping from the Cook Inlet floor that huge bubbles of gas were erupting. Ships couldn't approach for fear of falling into the bubbles and any exhaust sparks could ignite a fire plume. This was probaby a small leak compared to what was released in Siberia as a result of the nuclear blast!



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by MetatronCubensis
I thought HAARP too when I read 6.2 miles deep. Wasn't that the same depth of the Chinese quake earlier this year?



Location 43.494°N, 127.398°W
Magnitude 5.3
Date-Time Friday, November 14, 2008 at 01:48:37 UTC
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 05:48:37 PM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 43.494°N, 127.398°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region OFF THE COAST OF OREGON


source

Another depth of 6.2 miles just last week off the coast of Oregon.



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Niall197
Nine nukes, of that yield, detonated in the Arctic would've been noticed by folks not just in the vicinity but much further afield too. The Northern Lights would've been lit up like a Christmas Tree & radiation detectors in Europe, Canada etc would've been going off the gauge.

MSM isn't reporting it because it didn't happen. Simple as.




Your point on the radiation detectors going off is not exactly true, Water as it turns out is an excellent radiation shield especially water thats 6 miles deep, Remember where they stow spent reactor rods?? in water thats where, to keep them cool and to shield from the radiation.

Read this...

en.wikipedia.org...

edit added wiki link

Sailor




[edit on 19-11-2008 by Sailor1]



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 06:59 PM
link   
ORIGINAL QUOTE:

"Your point on the radiation detectors going off is not exactly true, Water as it turns out is an excellent radiation shield especially water thats 6 miles deep, Remember where they stow spent reactor rods?? in water thats where, to keep them cool and to shield from the radiation."

---

At 6 miles deep this would be almost the depth
of the deepest part of the ocean which is the Marianas trench
which is 10,911 meters (35,798 ft). or 6.77 miles deep

From Wikipedia:
The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1,038 m (3,410 ft).
The deepest point is in the Eurasian Basin, at 5,450 m
(17,900 ft). which is NOWHERE NEAR 6 miles deep.

There would have also been an EMP (electromagnetic pulse)
detected by various agencies in Northern Canada, Nunavut,
Yukon, Northern British Columbia and Alaska and I see no
such EMP events recorded even within the amateur community
who have decently sensitive equipment and are unlikely to
have been "Corrupted" by the NWO, Bilderbergers, Aliens, etc.

An earthquake DOES NOT mean a nuclear detonation!
And the plates up north ARE tectonically active so movement
is NOT surprising...although that's NOT to say it COULD NOT
have been an explosion...there are OTHER ways than RADIOLOGICALLY/EMP DETECTABLE NUKES to make a
big bang and move some Earth around at that depth!



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 07:08 PM
link   
The arctic ocean is only two miles deep, and if was bomb the the hydraulic pressure would have blow everything above it to hell. Maybe it was the aliens in war or some thing I think them live that deep.

[edit on 19-11-2008 by googolplex]



posted on Nov, 19 2008 @ 07:17 PM
link   
I don't think 100 nukes would shift the magnetic pole a single inch.

It would be like tapping a 5 lb rock of rare earth with a toothpick in hopes of the same effect of changing polarity.

Nukes can't do it and neither can haarp. The SUN can but not easily.

 

Mod edit: Fixed the spelling of shift so it didn't show up as a censored word.

[edit on 21-11-2008 by GAOTU789]





top topics
 
11
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join