Mothership over MO? With vid!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 06:46 PM by JipStix
I'm on the fence on this one. If you watch the whole piece of footage all the way through, you will see a portion where the camera zooms out. You can see an orange wall, the supposed UFO, and the street light, as well as an oncoming car:




Is that other picture from his personal website, the daytime picture? (this one below):



It doesn't look like it's filmed at the same spot if the guy's claiming it is.

Also, I was watching the first video, where the guy with the headset (no idea on his name) was speaking about how it was filmed in Northwest Arizona in August of 2004. Why the discrepancy, did he just make a mistake, was it really filmed in Phoenix?

If it was filmed in Northwest Arizona like the guy (in first video, with headset) claims, this could most probably be wild fires. There were many different wildfires burning in California and Arizona in August.

www.disasternews.net...

To me it looks like the video shows 4 different points of flame with the resultant smoke being carried away in the strong winds (which this guy Rob claims were around 30mph).


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 07:48 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Nohup



I am ALWAYS skeptical about UFO's and such. Yes, I do believe they exist.
However
I dont believe this is a "hill fire" simply because of the angle in relation to the light pole. If it were from a higher vantage point, yeah most possible answer. This is too low. The hill fire would be burning in mid air at this angle.

May not be a spacecraft but its not a hill fire either.

try again please.


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 07:52 PM by malignant_tumor
reply to post by goodwood_



Your reference to a comment I made in another thread is irrelevant in this one. My reference to spitting in the wind, is actually quite positive if you dont think about it in a negative way. If you can't find something in the search feature and a member like Internos puts 3 previous topics on the same matter (although there are more) and don't educate yourself about the subject first, then why continue discussing it in a inaccurate manner?

I reply to threads in an honest matter. My post aren't supposed to be taken personally or in a negative matter. That's my opinion anyway, you are just expressing yours about me. You are entitled to "feel" them, but in actuality, has nothing to do with this thread and are uncalled for. If you have a problem then u2u me.

Let's stay on topic here,
Discussed many times on ATS, here are some threads:

Convincing video... real or fake?

Battleship UFO

Giant battleship in the sky?


reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 10:53 PM by jcheney
reply to post by ALLis0NE



Be sure to post a follow up on this one AllisOne. I'd love to hear your conclusions on whether or not you think it's cgi.

I too straddle the fence on this one. I'm just not convinced.

My guess is the original poster didn't know the state abbreviation for MN, and put MO by mistake.

I'm from flatland, so I don't know about the wild-fire story. and with the "definitive" proof of a day shot I should expect to see a mountain where this fire allegedly occured
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 88 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 61 replies