Why or why wouldn't you?
Is the government going to bail them out, or should they?
What is your take?
|
With the spectre of bankruptcy looming quite realistically on the horizon, I'm thinking no, but I must temper that with the fact that $2.67 a share
does look rather bargainish at this point.
|
And had you bought it at noon, you'd be down 7 cents per share in less than an hour . . .
You could have bought Ford stock at 9 a.m. for about $1.65 a share and you'd only be down 40 cents a share if you flipped it now.
Charming.
Ford may end the day under $1 with GM heading down toward the $2 mark . . .
When my uncle left GM several years ago, he was given a number of shares as a 'retirement' gift with the proviso that he could only cash them out
after the stock hit $70 a share.
I think he's using those certificates to light the fireplace now.
|
I guess now it is 2.61. Poor GM.
It was 40 bucks a year ago I think.
Not that I know a lot about this sort of thing. But I just can't imagine the government letting the biggest auto makers in the country go bankrupt. A
lot of communities could be hurt by that.
|
Now trading at $1.78 . . .
Ford is about ready to dip under a buck.
Oh man . . . what a freakin' mess
|
Rofflecopters and lollerskates
|
reply to post by nixie_nox
Yup, but in the long run we get hurt by bailing out failing companies. Change is hard, but in the end worth it if we do it right.
|
I would never buy GM shares considering the long term viability of the company.
Perhaps if the bailout stipulates that there must be a seed change from making fuel inefficient cars to hyper-efficient ones (not even necessarily
hybrids); plus forced research into fuel cells etc... perhaps then I might buy into it.
Otherwise GM has no future but the graveyard.
|
What Is an American Car?
Before “loaning” billions more in taxpayer money to some very bad credit risks, simply because they are old American brands associated with
Detroit, we might ask what distinguishes these companies from others.
The not-so-big three are certainly are no less global than, say, Honda. General Motors gets 44% of its revenue from other countries and Ford gets
53%, according to Forbes (April 21). A German company, Daimler-Benz, still owns a fifth of Chrysler, and a group of affluent private investors owns
the rest.
An “American” brand tells you little about where all the parts in a car are made.Dodge Stealth, made in Japan by Mitsubishi. Similarly, today’s
Chevy Aveo is imported from Daewoo in South Korea. Yet Hyundai has a plant in Alabama.
Cars.com found only four cars and six light trucks with a domestic content (meaning US or Canadian) above 75%. That list includes the Toyota Tundra
and Sienna and the Honda Odyssey. Other Honda’s have a 60-70% domestic content, barely missing the cut.
The “Detroit” metaphor for primarily domestic vehicles is also inappropriate. Among the remaining seven vehicles with a very high domestic
content, three are made outside Michigan —the Chevy Malibu from Kansas and Cobalt from Ohio, and the Ford Explorer from Kentucky. Ford’s F-150
truck might be made in Michigan or Missouri, the Chevy Silverado in Michigan or Indiana.
The only strictly “Detroit” cars with high domestic content are the Pontiac G6 from Orion MI and the Chrysler Sebring from Sterling Heights MI.
Consumer Reports says, “The G6 isn’t a very good car” and “The Sebring is one of the least competitive family sedans on the market.” Yet
these are the only Detroit-made sedans with a high domestic content. Does anyone really think taxpayer subsidies can save cars like that? And why
should the federal government offer special deals for uncompetitive cars made in Michigan, thus tilting the playing field against better cars made in,
say, Ohio, Tennessee or South Carolina?
As a Chicago Fed study documents, “the auto industry is increasingly characterized by international carmakers, as well as by parts suppliers that
operate in multiple countries. Against a background of global supply chains, it has become quite difficult to identify and label products such as
autos by nationality. Overall, the processes of globalization of markets and supply chains have served to noticeably lower prices of new cars for
American consumers and businesses. On a quality-adjusted basis, for example, new vehicle prices have been falling at an average annual rate of 0.5%
over the current decade. Importantly, higher quality and gains in longevity are among the improvements in today’s vehicles.”
|
GM is currently building a $300 million factory in Russia right now to build SUVs, right outside of St. Petersburg. That's where your money's going
to go, no matter what they say.
HERE
|
better to just put your money into a pile, pour gasoline over all of it and light it on fire. Watch it burn. Might be more interesting than watching
your money get wiped out when GM stocks plunge to worthlessness.
|