|
|
Topic started on 19-11-2008 @ 10:09 AM by karl 12
|
You realy can't make this stuff up:
Saudi religious police ban sale of cats, dogs:
findarticles.com...
The police have issued a decree banning the sale of the pets, seen as a sign of Western influence
"This is blind emulation of the infidels."wrote Aleetha al-Jihani in a letter to Al-Madina newspaper...
..According to one hadith, Muhammad said a Muslim loses credit for one good deed each day he keeps a dog and even said dogs should be killed unless
used for hunting or protection.
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Conspiracies in Religions topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 10:33 AM by paperplanes
|
I would recommend that everyone read at least the first page of the article linked, because it goes into the public perception of this new law and of
dogs and cats in general. Apparently, most are baffled by the law and feel it is unneccessary and unreasonable. The article also describes the Saudi
view of cats (generally respected as Muhammad had great affection for them) and dogs (often viewed as unclean and bothersome). It is interesting to
note the cultural differences between this region and the West, cultural differences that the Muttawa (religious police) are very keen to maintain and
even strengthen.
Remember, the Muttawa are the nutters who go around patrolling shopping centers to make sure that unmarried Saudis aren't "flirting" (which very
often means even looking at one another or standing too close) and chastising people for having the audacity to walk their dog in public. It is going
to take a very, very, very long time for this culture to come into line with modern times. I wouldn't be surprised if it were a century or more from
now, honestly.
[edit on 19/11/08 by paperplanes]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 10:48 AM by karl 12
|
reply to post by paperplanes
Paperplanes thanks for the reply,your not wrong about the Saudi Arabian religious police being 'a bit behind with the times'.
It appears they've (wait for it....) also banned the color red:
www.boingboing.net...
Joking aside,heres a link showing some truly heinous attrocities perpertrated by these extremist religious madmen:
www.belowtopsecret.com...
Cheers Karl
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 10:54 AM by Merigold
|
culture to come into line with modern times
Don't you mean come in line with Western Culture?
The way I see it is that if people aren't satisfied with their lot in life they will do something about it. Non Western doesn't mean BAD.
I eat horse meat regularly and find absolutley nothing strange about it. There are people who think this to be absolutley barbaric. Do their opinions
make it bad?
OFF topic: What the hell happened to the preview button??
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 10:55 AM by Prima Facie
|
Aleetha al-jihani is not only foolish but he must not be reading the Quran..
Dogs in the Quran....
It is interesting to know that dogs are mentioned in the Quran 5 times, not just once, 7:176, 18:18, 18:22 (three times). NO WHERE does God call the
dogs dirty animals or give any indication that they should be avoided or treated the way many Muslims think they should. Actually the story of the
people of the cave, in Sura 18, gives the indication. that we should appreciate.
The people of the cave, 3, 5 or 7 were mentioned in the Quran and every time God insists on letting us know that their dog was there with them. Their
story can be as complete without the mention of the dog, but God did, Why ?
God is telling us these righteous people were in the cave with their dog, if it is not righteous to have dogs, God would not have told us that story
in which the dog has to be remembered as being there. We have to know the quality of God, if we were to worship Him correctly. When God says something
He means it, and when he does not, he means it as much. If God did not curse the dog and call it all kinds of name, it is because God wants us to know
that He created that beautiful creature and He expected us to make all use and companinonship with that animal that accompanied these righteous people
of the cave.
Fabricated hadiths contradict the Quran. Many of them narrated by Abu Hurayra. Abu Hurayra, whose name is translated as , father of the little cat,
hated dogs and women and from his mouth came many hadiths that insulted women and cursed the dogs and make them undesirable animals that need to be
avoided and in other hadiths killed.
These fabricted hadtihs were falsely attributed to the prophet Muhammed who cannot utter but the teachings of the Quran and would only be a living
example of the Quran itself. The prophet Muhammed who lived by the Quran could not have done anything but agree with the Quran,not contradict it. God
gave us a great criteria to judge His truth form the man-made fabrications;
"....If it were from othr than God, they would have found in numerous contradictions 4:82
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 11:06 AM by paperplanes
|
Ah yes, I remember the Valentine's Day vilification very well. It is just so odd to hear these stories and realize that, thus far, the government
there has not done something to curb the power the Muttawa (or Mutaween) holds. It really shows the vacuum that government lives in, where it is
absolutely reasonable to criminalize something like a Valentine's Day gift and arrest men for so much as sitting near an unrelated woman. But for
every one humorously absurd story about the Muttawa, there are ten more that are absolutely horrific. Their offenses have ranged from organizing
public stoning to beheading school children to, as you note in your other thread, preventing young girls from escaping a burning building because they
weren't wearing the appropriate Muslim clothing. It is just disgusting that something like that is allowed to occur anywhere, and with such power and
impunity. Fortunately, the more I read about it, the more it seems that the progressive Muslims view the Muttawa as a stifling, unnecessary and
brutish force. The progressives are a significant portion of the population, and seem to be increasing as younger, more liberal Muslims reach
adulthood. I believe these cultures will have to go through a few more generations before they have purged this way of thinking. It is just so
shocking that it is even viewed as reasonable.
I do have to wonder if the Muttawa and their supporters have really stopped to think of what their behavior is saying. It seems to me that by
enforcing these ridiculous, superfluous rules, they are really suggesting that Muslims are too weak of character and their relationship to Islam to
tenuous to police their own behavior. "Not only do we need to tell you who to marry, how to marry, and what to do in your marriage, but also when and
if you can walk your dog, care for your cat, speak to a stranger in public..." and on and on. This is an insult to Muslims and their faith, by the
very people who claim to be upholding Islam. If they feel that Muslims are so incapable of doing the right thing, and must be eternally restrained for
fear of temptation, what does this say about Islam?
[edit on 19/11/08 by paperplanes]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 11:14 AM by paperplanes
|
Originally posted by Merigold
culture to come into line with modern times
Don't you mean come in line with Western Culture?
The way I see it is that if people aren't satisfied with their lot in life they will do something about it. Non Western doesn't mean BAD.
I eat horse meat regularly and find absolutley nothing strange about it. There are people who think this to be absolutley barbaric. Do their opinions
make it bad?
Somehow I just knew that this would come up. By "come into line with modern times", I mean discontinue the stoning of women and men for public
enjoyment, the brutal punishment of rape victims (and similar absolutely horrific subjugation of females), the banning of all dissident voices and
their public expression, often subdued with murder, widespread torture of the guilty and innocent alike--the list goes on.
If by "Western culture" you mean the type of culture where this sort of thing is not allowed, then yes, absolutely--please, for chrissake, come into
line with Western culture! If you find this idea disagreeable, I don't know how to help you. You seem to be lacking a fundamental aspect of
rationality if the current state of the Muslim world is all right with you.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 11:15 AM by Prima Facie
|
I have not heard much about the mutaween, it seems like their using islam as an instrument of fear on the local people, the goverment is probaly
turning a blind eye to this, as control is in their favour.. People should speak to a respected Iman about anything there not sure about.. The
mutaween are abusing authority and people..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 11:17 AM by paperplanes
|
Originally posted by Prima Facie
Aleetha al-jihani is not only foolish but he must not be reading the Quran..
Fabricated hadiths contradict the Quran. Many of them narrated by Abu Hurayra. Abu Hurayra, whose name is translated as , father of the little cat,
hated dogs and women and from his mouth came many hadiths that insulted women and cursed the dogs and make them undesirable animals that need to be
avoided and in other hadiths killed.
These fabricted hadtihs were falsely attributed to the prophet Muhammed who cannot utter but the teachings of the Quran and would only be a living
example of the Quran itself. The prophet Muhammed who lived by the Quran could not have done anything but agree with the Quran,not contradict it. God
gave us a great criteria to judge His truth form the man-made fabrications;
"....If it were from othr than God, they would have found in numerous contradictions 4:82
I understand that many rulings of the Muttawa are not in line with the Qur'an. The issue here, though, is the Muttawa's behavior in Saudi Arabia and
the fact that the government there has allowed them to become so powerful.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 11:34 AM by Prima Facie
|
What is it? with goverments wanting complete control of it's citizens.. It seems these days virtually every goverment on this planet is only
interested in manipulating us for there gain.. The saudi goverment in this case letting the muttawa do their dirty work...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 01:59 PM by karl 12
|
Originally posted by paperplanes
I understand that many rulings of the Muttawa are not in line with the Qur'an. The issue here, though, is the Muttawa's behavior in Saudi Arabia and
the fact that the government there has allowed them to become so powerful.
Yes it seems the Saudi Royal family is allowing the religious police to get away with all manner of atrocities in the name of wahhabi islam.
From beheading witches,scalding and stoning adulterers,whipping women in town squares and harrassing and beating unmarried people right down to
banning fashion,dogs,cats and red objects.
Perhaps this has to do with each iman's individual 'interpretation' of abrahamic lore (and the abuse of power by insecure people)-it doesn't just
occur in Saudi Arabia-a young girl was recently sentenced and stoned to death by a shariah court in Somalia.
[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:01 PM by karl 12
|
Originally posted by Merigold
culture to come into line with modern times
Don't you mean come in line with Western Culture?
The way I see it is that if people aren't satisfied with their lot in life they will do something about it. Non Western doesn't mean BAD.
I eat horse meat regularly and find absolutley nothing strange about it. There are people who think this to be absolutley barbaric. Do their opinions
make it bad?
Are you saying that all these reprehensible actions are just fine and it is Western people's fault that we cannot morally assimilate them?
If thats the case then maybe we should start beheading women at the half time period of the F.A. Cup final.
[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 02:20 PM by Equinox99
|
It's kind of ironic seeing as the Saudi's are supposed to be our allies yet they call us infidels. If they did not have money I am sure they would
have been taken over ages ago.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 06:23 PM by Grandma
|
reply to post by paperplanes
It is so strange for me to believe that these kind of terrible wrongs are happening in our world. It is so sad and they say they do this in the name
of their 'God". I just know my God would not allow such things. Now, I know some of you are going to bring up OT days and what happened to Moses
and all that. Just remember, Jesus, came to bridge the gap that was between man and his Creator.
Peace,
Grandma
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 06:26 PM by Grandma
|
reply to post by karl 12
What has happened to our world? Where is the love of Jesus shown in these people's lives. Or whatever they believe in don't they believe in loving
their fellow man and treating each other with common respect?
Grandma
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2008 @ 06:26 PM by karl 12
|
Originally posted by Grandma
I just know my God would not allow such things. Now, I know some of you are going to bring up OT days and what happened to Moses and all that. Just
remember, Jesus, came to bridge the gap that was between man and his Creator.
Peace,
Grandma
Well, Grandma you're certainly entitles to your opinion...although I think all the abrahamic sects have the same heritage.
Cheers Karl
[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|